| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
The_Dude 
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
|
 Posted: 17 Oct 2012 at 19:58 |
 Gossip Boy wrote:
bansisdead wrote:
There's a slight difference between sending a friend request and sending a siege army... |
For me there's a big difference between sending siege engines and a friend request but then my point is about making generalizations.
I am in no way defending the siege sent by the consone member but if somebody says that consone is a scum because of that I will like to differ with that person |
Who is your in game account, Gossip Boy?
It's hard to care about your respect when you are anonymous.
I base my conclusion on actions, not words.
Siege was sent Siege was not recalled Siege was destroyed Attacker is still in Consone
If Consone was sincere about this not being authorized, they would have kicked the attacker. They have refused to do so. Consone has clearly endorsed and ratified the attack.
|
 |
Gossip Boy
Forum Warrior
Joined: 03 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 259
|
Posted: 17 Oct 2012 at 19:51 |
bansisdead wrote:
There's a slight difference between sending a friend request and sending a siege army... |
For me there's a big difference between sending siege engines and a friend request but then my point is about making generalizations. I am in no way defending the siege sent by the consone member but if somebody says that consone is a scum because of that I will like to differ with that person
|
|
Elessar2
[08:34]<Rill> when you've just had part of your brain taken out, you lack a certain amount of credibility
<KillerPoodle> I can say anything I like and it is impossible to prove or disprove
|
|
bansisdead
Postmaster
Joined: 08 Jan 2012
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 609
|
Posted: 17 Oct 2012 at 18:23 |
|
There's a slight difference between sending a friend request and sending a siege army...
|
|
|
|
Gossip Boy
Forum Warrior
Joined: 03 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 259
|
Posted: 17 Oct 2012 at 18:03 |
The_Dude wrote:
Detritus wrote:
The_Dude wrote:
DeathDealer89 wrote:
Hey guys we are a peacful training alliance, only we are currently at War against the number 1 alliance. Oh yea and we declared they war to. |
Consone sieged RES yesterday. 
Please explain. |
Hello TD,
only thing I heard, was that one person started a siege, which was ended soon after. If you look at the stats, there's no siege on RES atm, and I'm sure it will stay like this.
I'll investigate in Consone forum, who, when, why, and will tell you as soon as I found out.
This siege DEFINITLY wasn't ordered by Consone command. If you could send me some more informations (IGM's, reasons, etc...) it would fasten up things, of course... |
The attacker is still Consone. Do not try to claim this was unauthorized. WE is still a member of Consone. Do not try to claim this was unauthorized.
The siege "was ended soon after" because RES destroyed it. It was not recalled as Jasche has claimed and you insinuate now.
RES refused to help Consone (who was NOT a RES Confed), so Consone sieged RES. This Consone bunch is scum of the worst sort. |
Some days back a player from RES sent me a friend request and I didn't even exchanged a mail with that player before (or after for that matter)..so should I conclude that all RES players are pushy and are used to send unsolicited requests to everyone and a lot of other crap. These kind of generalizations never represent the truth and I never expected TD to make them. Somebody lost respect.
Edited by Gossip Boy - 17 Oct 2012 at 18:04
|
|
Elessar2
[08:34]<Rill> when you've just had part of your brain taken out, you lack a certain amount of credibility
<KillerPoodle> I can say anything I like and it is impossible to prove or disprove
|
|
The_Dude
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
|
Posted: 17 Oct 2012 at 17:29 |
Detritus wrote:
The_Dude wrote:
DeathDealer89 wrote:
Hey guys we are a peacful training alliance, only we are currently at War against the number 1 alliance. Oh yea and we declared they war to. |
Consone sieged RES yesterday.
Please explain. |
Hello TD,
only thing I heard, was that one person started a siege, which was ended soon after. If you look at the stats, there's no siege on RES atm, and I'm sure it will stay like this.
I'll investigate in Consone forum, who, when, why, and will tell you as soon as I found out.
This siege DEFINITLY wasn't ordered by Consone command. If you could send me some more informations (IGM's, reasons, etc...) it would fasten up things, of course... |
The attacker is still Consone. Do not try to claim this was unauthorized. WE is still a member of Consone. Do not try to claim this was unauthorized.
The siege "was ended soon after" because RES destroyed it. It was not recalled as Jasche has claimed and you insinuate now.
RES refused to help Consone (who was NOT a RES Confed), so Consone sieged RES. This Consone bunch is scum of the worst sort.
|
|
Detritus
Greenhorn
Joined: 16 Oct 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 60
|
Posted: 17 Oct 2012 at 12:03 |
The_Dude wrote:
DeathDealer89 wrote:
Hey guys we are a peacful training alliance, only we are currently at War against the number 1 alliance. Oh yea and we declared they war to. |
Consone sieged RES yesterday.
Please explain. |
Hello TD,
only thing I heard, was that one person started a siege, which was ended soon after. If you look at the stats, there's no siege on RES atm, and I'm sure it will stay like this.
I'll investigate in Consone forum, who, when, why, and will tell you as soon as I found out.
This siege DEFINITLY wasn't ordered by Consone command. If you could send me some more informations (IGM's, reasons, etc...) it would fasten up things, of course...
|
|
Detritus
Greenhorn
Joined: 16 Oct 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 60
|
Posted: 17 Oct 2012 at 11:30 |
Ignoring the unqualified rants from our enemies inbetween, I'm delighted to answer this question.
ES2 wrote:
So you declared a war then now are asking for players to join SAGES to help defend you in the war that you declared? |
Sages is part of Consone. It is correct, that about half of our members have alts in other Consone alliances, mostly VIC.
It is also true, that we want peaceful solutions. As this is also true for VIC itself, I see no contradiction. In all those 2 years I had been in VIC/Vicx/Sages, I only witnessed one defense against those players founding TMM later (the rest is history...). H? in the meantime has lead some wars, often quite aggressively, chasing their beaten enemies even after the war clearly was over.
That's not our way!
Sage will fight this war until H? gives up attacking Consone. Nothing more to it.
Sages declared war, as we were left out by H?'s declarations on Consone somehow. But as I stated earlier, Consone is a "Mutual Defense Confed".
I'll lend everyone a dictionary, who struggles with mutual (I looked it up myself  )
We offer taking in players wanting to defend Consone, with the option to stay afterward for research...
|
|
Ossian
Forum Warrior
Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 456
|
Posted: 17 Oct 2012 at 10:08 |
The_Dude wrote:
Yes, Starry, you might imagine my present attitude toward Consone is ...uhh.... yeah, let's just leave it at that... you can imagine it. |
I agree with the "...uhh...let's just leave it at that... " part
Edited by Ossian - 17 Oct 2012 at 10:09
|
|
The_Dude
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
|
Posted: 17 Oct 2012 at 06:23 |
DeathDealer89 wrote:
I had no idea there was a handshake emoticon. |
Indeed. I find it handy. 
|
|
DeathDealer89
Postmaster
Joined: 04 Jan 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 944
|
Posted: 17 Oct 2012 at 05:58 |
I had no idea there was a handshake emoticon.
|
|
Tweet
SAGES is recruiting for defense
