Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Rules
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedRules

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
GM Luna View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar
Community Manager

Joined: 22 Oct 2011
Location: Illyriad
Status: Offline
Points: 2042
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Rules
    Posted: 20 Dec 2013 at 12:47
Closed for breaking Godwin's law.

Luna
GM Luna | Illyriad Community Manager | community@illyriad.co.uk

Back to Top
theboss View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Dec 2013 at 12:04

Now Kumo, no need for name calling

The Axis that you labeled our co-fed, which one are you referring to ?:

The Axis of evil= Nazis

The Axis of terror = terrorist’s

It’s offensive that you and some of your H members use this term in a public forum and have also seen your members use it in GC.

It you want to wave your H stick and be a bigot, keep your name calling to your alliance chat.

 

P.S. This is only a game, keep it friendly.

 

Back to Top
geofrey View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 31 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1013
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Dec 2013 at 23:00
This post reeks of desperation for a seemingly impossible victory. 






Edited by geofrey - 19 Dec 2013 at 23:01

Back to Top
Caconafyx View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn
Avatar

Joined: 04 Jul 2012
Location: Stamford, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 87
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Dec 2013 at 22:45
I'd like to remind Kumo that it was his alliance in the last war that demanded that Bomshanka pay reparations in the form of losing a couple of cities.

This despite the fact that Bom had left EE for the crows to stay out of the war from the very beginning.

Now this may come as a bit of shock to some people, but it seems to me like H? think that it is one rule for them and one rule for everyone else.

Oh and whilst I'm at it, Triplock had to lose a city as well. His crime? He launched two attacks during the whole of the six month war. But he was 200K+ pop. so one can't help but feel that small-minded people wanted to cut him down a notch.

Where was your decency and sense of fair play then Kumo? 
Back to Top
Mahaut View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2012
Location: North West UK
Status: Offline
Points: 173
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Dec 2013 at 19:22
Axis?   Really???

If anyone from H? or their allies compares me to Helga from 'ello ello' I will be extremely flattered. 
In all other cases I think it might be better to keep your comparisons a bit more light hearted - this is a game war involving pixels, not a real life war, and to compare a game player or a group of alliances to anyone, or any government, that was involved in a real war is not at all amusing -especially to those who have lost family members to conflict - and completely inappropriate. Disapprove
Kumo, with all due respect, I suggest you take some time to chill and regain your perspective on things before you return to this. 


Edited by Mahaut - 19 Dec 2013 at 19:24
Back to Top
Mr Damage View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 598
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Dec 2013 at 18:02
Kumo, the title of this thread is a bit boring don't you think? How about something like "The Empire Strikes Back", beware Jedis, Vadar is on the warpath.
Back to Top
Darkwords View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 23 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1005
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Dec 2013 at 17:38
Just thought I would break this apart.

Originally posted by Kumomoto Kumomoto wrote:

Another point:

The Axis is wiping players out up North. We don't want to do this, but... we can NOT allow these players to just leave their alliances and make us "trust them" that we won't be hammered by magic attacks or future attacks...


Axis?  what axis?

It is hardly surprising that you can not 'trust' people, seeing as a number of members from your coalition have surrendered and then rejoined the war.  When you mix with such untrustworthy people it is quite predictable that you would not trust others, even those that have not sunk to such low levels of cowardice as your allies.

Originally posted by Kumomoto Kumomoto wrote:


Our players up North are getting exterminated, so... sorry to all you (frankly wonderful) folks that lived next to us in the South.


No, your players up North have the option to surrender or to fight to the death (something we would rather they did not do).  What is happening to them is of their own choice and free will.

Originally posted by Kumomoto Kumomoto wrote:


But we can not let potential enemies live next to us when your allies are on a policy of extinction up North...

This is an open letter to you. Leave now or suffer the same as our folks are up North...


By this do you mean being given lenient surrender terms?  As that is what is happening to your 'folks' up North.

Originally posted by Kumomoto Kumomoto wrote:


At least we are giving you notice. Nobody gave our folks notice...


What a declaration of war and the offer of surrender is not 'notice' that you might get seiged.... really?  What does it take? should we spell it out with sov claims outside your cities?

Originally posted by Kumomoto Kumomoto wrote:


We did not choose to make this into a regional war, The Axis did. And you are seeing them rejoicing in destroying cities from outlying cities and/or players who don't play a lot who can't move their cities quickly...


Where are we 'rejoicing' exactly.  We are not so arrogant as to come on here to boast about our victories when it looks like we have the upper hand... not like some.

Also it is not just players who do not play often that are getting hit, it is all our opponents that are getting hit.  We do not simply target easy targets, like you did early in the war.

Originally posted by Kumomoto Kumomoto wrote:


I will not comment upon what the results will be. You will see the results...


More whining on the forum from yourself I suspect.


<Deranzin> I'd agree with darkone on that

[21:59]<ropadope> you know I am perverted

<Bartleby> dark is upsetting some peeps
Back to Top
Elmindra View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 10 Sep 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 464
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Dec 2013 at 16:56
Don't worry though H?, as you may have noticed that since we are running out of armies to fight in the north we will indeed make our way south to your towns there soon enough. After all, that is what you want right.
Back to Top
Tyrande Whisperwinds View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 02 Mar 2013
Location: Portugal
Status: Offline
Points: 177
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Dec 2013 at 16:35
As far as i know, every member that decided to accept terms has been completely left alone. It´s completely one´s decision to take a step forward and say: "ok, i had enough of this, i want out".
Also, members who choose to not participate in the war by leaving alliances that declared to safe houses are also been left alone. No one touched them.
So, bottom point is, no one is attacking any1 that states they don´t want to take part in the war anymore (or never wanted to take part in it in the first place).

So, i´m sorry to say, i don´t understand where all of this came from...

As for regional disputes... i´m sorry, but what was it expected for us to do? Send 1billion troops to Middle Kingdom or something (just insert very far far away place) so that others could smash them without a chance for us to reinforce, etc? Ie: make our forces sitting ducks?
Ofc we fight our fight close to us... That´s common sense..
Back to Top
Le Roux View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 30 May 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 151
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Dec 2013 at 16:19
Originally posted by Kumomoto Kumomoto wrote:

If you are in the war and you send your forces to another city or alliance to run from retribution, expect it. We are seeing a lot of this... Leaving your alliance because you are in our areas is not an escape from the treatment that our allies are being treated to up North...

 
There is a danger in believeing the spin one may have been given from various bitter sources.  Your 'allies up north' have been presented some very favorable terms, incredibly light considering those mandated by "other" large alliances in wartime.  Many have accepted those terms individually.
 
Those that have refused any and all negotiation continue to fight, that is indeed their choice. Some view it as noble, others view it as folly, but it is indeed their choice.  Hardly any more severe treatment than H? provides their foes.  Should an enemy refuse any negotiation, would you propose that a war simply stop?  Everyone go home just because of the losing leader refuses to discuss terms?   It seems a very odd strategy then...  your opponents can always manage victory simply by ignoring their IGM's?
 
Strange logic indeed !
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.