Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Rhyagelle Responds To Absaroke Aggression
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedRhyagelle Responds To Absaroke Aggression

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1819202122 65>
Author
 Rating: Topic Rating: 1 Votes, Average 1.00  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
The_Dragon View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn


Joined: 03 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 103
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Oct 2012 at 12:45
Originally posted by Grego Grego wrote:

" Belargyle, Kumo, Llyorn......"

We are long enough in Illy to know what each of us stand for. Your morality makes me sick, I can only hope that you don't have actual power in RL. I spent enough time here, met some dear people, which I will miss, but all in all, Illy is same as RL. Most of community are sheeps.

I do not wish to initiate major war because of my believes of fairness and justice, so I am willing to resign from both Absaroke and Consone. I just ask you to stop destroying RB, zebazga, Skim Milk, and so many other players who did nothing to deserve beeing kicked out from this game.

I will fall on my knees and begg you for it, if needed, just STOP.

You can deal with me after

Grego, losing towns is not the end. Players can build their towns back. I lose all my towns on my previous account in Illyriad but I made new account and back to the game.
If someone can not afford to lose their towns then please play a game where you can't lose your towns.
Back to Top
The_Dragon View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn


Joined: 03 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 103
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Oct 2012 at 12:54
Originally posted by Mogul Mogul wrote:


Consone has currently 3360 towns...

If you see Consone as one, then you have to see  Rhy-H (and maybe others) as one too.



Originally posted by Mogul Mogul wrote:


Ok you are right with this... and my opinion is actually same. That means RHY are the one who wants war, they want to continue with war, they want to demand things from ABSA and so on... and Absa is the one who wants peace all the time and are just defending themselves.

My only problem is that in whole this thread "press office" and some other posters are trying to present RHY as peaceful guys who are just defending against aggression which is complete nonsense.


Absa attacked Rhy armies first. Every attack to other's army/caravan/harvester should be considered as an invitation of war. You can't hit someone then say "I don't want a war". If we can, then let me rename all my commanders' name to "I don't want a war" and "I don't want to get attacked back". After that I can send my armies to kill any army without worrying to get attacked back.
Back to Top
Smoking GNU View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Location: Windhoek
Status: Offline
Points: 313
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Oct 2012 at 12:57
OK, i can't take this anymore. I'm sorry bel, but i cannot stay silent here anymore.

The language being thrown around here, particularly from the H? side of this discussion, is VERY reminiscent of the type of language Used by the OLD valar (no accusations against the current valar)

In my eyes, SKb/ABSA/Vic are entirely justified in their actions. (while i must admit the language absa used in some of their communications might have been brash and an invitation to "COME AT ME, BRO" but i do not see this as grounds to siege every ABSA member in keppen).

Breaking sieges against your ALLY is NOT an aggressive move, it is a FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL (waaaa, they're not letting us kill them!!)

And to anyone trying to deny this with the urgency of a potty break, this IS about the mine, since this is WHERE it STARTED. the mine was SKBs, RHY tried to take it, SKB called in help from an ally against a bigger alliance. An ALLY. Expecting them not to help is ludicrous. Great friends they'd be in that situation, if anyone would trust them enough to be friends with them after that.

Sieging almost every ABSA town in Keppen is an ENORMOUS overreaction to a mining dispute, especially since the players involved are not even being sieged (I remember several instances where we had grievances against people in other alliances, but after we declared war against these alliances we concentrated almost EXCLUSIVELY our attention against these specific people, BELAR. Show me the sense in trying to kill the cities of everyone else BESIDES the people involved).

As it is, i cannot accept the stance H? and (it looks to me with your comments on this thread) Dlords have taken in this situation. I love being in Dlords, and you are a dear friend, Belar, along with everyone in the Dlords royal cast, but i CANNOT in clear conscience condone these actions against Absa and say with a straight face in any time in the future that i might have the moral high ground in any other situation. It goes against my very nature.

HOWEVER, if any clear and undeniable evidence is shown at any time showing that absa provoked these sieges besides the incident on the mine or the taunting language in the conversations between RHY and ABSA (specifically Diplo and Magic attacks by ABSA against RHY) that would change around the situation considerably. Until such a time, i will not commit any troops in any offensive manner in this event, but will only use it in defense of Dlords and Dil members.

I am sorry for disobeying your command in this matter, belar, and i accept any punishment you feel is required for talking out of turn here in the public forum. As it is i feel physically sick having to apparently be stuck on THIS side of the situation.

-GNU


Back to Top
Tatharion View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 139
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Oct 2012 at 13:20
Thank you for your honesty in this matter GNU. It is highly honorable.

Kaldorei Sunstrider and his men happily sacrificed themselves a few minutes ago at 1PFK's siege.


Edited by Tatharion - 12 Oct 2012 at 13:22
Back to Top
Ander View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1269
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Oct 2012 at 13:36
For all RHY members who cheer about destroying Absa cities in Keppen,

This war was not started for your right over a mineral mine. This war was started to safeguard your 'right' to threaten and exploit a smaller alliance - SkB - as you please. To safeguard that right, you have sought help from H to eliminate Absa, SkB and anyone who support them. (there is atleast one H siege on the way to SkB that I know of)

By taking a favour for doing a dirty deed, you subject yourselves to the same treatment from your masters, that you wanted to subject SkB to. You may be able to sow fear among your neighbours by being H's sidekick, but what is the point if you have no cause for self respect?

For those few in H who are eager to support henchmen and extortionists - by systematically driving away the people who do not bow down to you, you become not the tallest among men, but the biggest animal in the den.

Thanks Tatharion for the journal of General Kaldorei Sunstrider, you made me feel proud to be a member of Absaroke.

And Thanks GNU, it is good to see courage and honesty when eyes are tired of seeing hypocrisy. 


Back to Top
Mogul View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior


Joined: 23 Sep 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 233
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Oct 2012 at 13:40
Originally posted by The_Dragon The_Dragon wrote:

Originally posted by Mogul Mogul wrote:

Consone has currently 3360 towns...
If you see Consone as one, then you have to see  Rhy-H (and maybe others) as one too.
I see Consone not "as one" but as one confederation group with 3360 towns and i see Crow federation as one group and H? and DLord... that's why I put them in one column
btw RHY is not confed with H?

Originally posted by The_Dragon The_Dragon wrote:

Every attack to other's army/caravan/harvester should be considered as an invitation of war.
And again and again... I don't agree with this.
I am not going to explain it over and over and i am also not going to place my army next to your town and leaving it there ignoring your request to leave so that you can understand.
Back to Top
dunnoob View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2011
Location: Elijal
Status: Offline
Points: 800
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Oct 2012 at 14:14
Originally posted by Smoking GNU Smoking GNU wrote:

Breaking sieges against your ALLY is NOT an aggressive move, it is a FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL (waaaa, they're not letting us kill them!!)
Breaking sieges is an act of war, and for sieges against active players it's certainly not the first act of war...
Originally posted by Smoking GNU Smoking GNU wrote:

this IS about the mine, since this is WHERE it STARTED.
...NAK, anybody trying to occupy a trove mine in the middle of three nearby towns not liking this would be starck mad.  Collecting the hides of killed rats could be more profitable than mining trove.  

It's not really about the mine, and started months earlier:  Check the date of the NAP between RHY and H? vs. the date of the Consone announcement, for starters, and take a very long look at the strategic map.
Originally posted by Smoking GNU Smoking GNU wrote:

mine was SKBs, RHY tried to take it, SKB called in help from an ally against a bigger alliance. An ALLY. Expecting them not to help is ludicrous.
Thumbs Up But then trove was never related to the strategical objective.  Some farmers want to test how cold or hot their soup really is.   


Back to Top
The_Dragon View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn


Joined: 03 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 103
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Oct 2012 at 14:19
Originally posted by Mogul Mogul wrote:

Originally posted by The_Dragon The_Dragon wrote:

Originally posted by Mogul Mogul wrote:

Consone has currently 3360 towns...
If you see Consone as one, then you have to see  Rhy-H (and maybe others) as one too.
I see Consone not "as one" but as one confederation group with 3360 towns and i see Crow federation as one group and H? and DLord... that's why I put them in one column
btw RHY is not confed with H?

Originally posted by The_Dragon The_Dragon wrote:

Every attack to other's army/caravan/harvester should be considered as an invitation of war.
And again and again... I don't agree with this.
I am not going to explain it over and over and i am also not going to place my army next to your town and leaving it there ignoring your request to leave so that you can understand.

Since when Confederation relationship have to be announce publicly in order to make it valid? Who creates that rule?

Look at alliances list, count how many alliances which has no confederation at all. If one of those alliances get attacked, is no alliance allowed to help it because the alliance who got attacked has no "Confederation" word in it's alliance diplomacy page?

For example, will Consone swear that they will not help Soon if Soon get attacked by an alliance because Consone don't have "Confederation" relationship with Soon in their alliance diplomacy page?

Placing an army next to other's town is also can be considered as a war invitation. If you put your army next to other's town and he is not only attack your army but also declare war to you, you have to accept that. No one has the right to decide whether his reaction is over reaction or not.
Back to Top
Granek View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn


Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 63
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Oct 2012 at 14:42
Originally posted by Smoking GNU Smoking GNU wrote:

Breaking sieges against your ALLY is NOT an aggressive move, it is a FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL (waaaa, they're not letting us kill them!!)

.................

Sieging almost every ABSA town in Keppen is an ENORMOUS overreaction to a mining dispute, especially since the players involved are not even being sieged 

It does seem as though there is more to this than Rhy/H? are putting forward.


Back to Top
Vanerin View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 05 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 418
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Oct 2012 at 14:48
Originally posted by belargyle belargyle wrote:

 
They were asked to become involved by SkB. Though there was no military action going on between RHY and SkB, no one was being attacked... 

I am sorry, but there was military action between Rhy and SkB. Rhy sent troops to SkB's square. Who first moved armies? And who failed to keep their promises?

I really applaud Jasche for the mature response he gave, but I personally would have a hard time trusting an alliance to stop killing my cities, especially when they went back on their word to leave an occupied mine. Regardless good job to Absa/Consone.

And huge props to you, GNU. Very good post and courage in posting it.

~Vanerin
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1819202122 65>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.