Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Rhyagelle, Absaroke and Skeleton Boar Peace Agreem
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedRhyagelle, Absaroke and Skeleton Boar Peace Agreem
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
 Rating: Topic Rating: 2 Votes, Average 5.00  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Bard View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 121 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Oct 2012 at 18:45
Oh cool, so H? and Consone can all go home peacefully now?  Since this supposedly burgeoned up out of the RHY/Absa/SkB thing I fail to see why the rest should continue.  Of course that hasn't stopped Curse declaring war on WE (not Consone) because DLords asked them, but that's another thing entirely.
Back to Top
DeathDealer89 View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster


Joined: 04 Jan 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 944 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Oct 2012 at 20:06
Well good they made peace.   Although RHY thought that everything was fine with SKB when Absa attacked their armies to.  So it wouldn't surprise me at all if Consone went back on well everything they 'promised.' 
Back to Top
Alti (SkB) View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar

Joined: 20 Oct 2012
Location: Tor Carrock
Status: Offline
Points: 17 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Oct 2012 at 21:50
Originally posted by DeathDealer89 DeathDealer89 wrote:

Well good they made peace.   Although RHY thought that everything was fine with SKB when Absa attacked their armies to.  So it wouldn't surprise me at all if Consone went back on well everything they 'promised.' 

I think you are unclear in what you have written - to pick on one point, Absa is the only Consone member that is a party to this agreement and they have not negotiated on behalf of Consone.  There is no suggestion that anything is settled between H? and VIC, or Dlord and WE, or any other conflict.

If you agree with that, then which promise are you worried about?
Back to Top
DeathDealer89 View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster


Joined: 04 Jan 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 944 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Oct 2012 at 21:53
RHY had and agreement with SKB.  

ABSA attacked RHY troops after an agreement was made.  

What is to stop ABSA from attacking RHY troops when it suits them after this agreement?  
Back to Top
Gon View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 117 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Oct 2012 at 23:08
I'm just curious what would happen to any army that parked 2 squares from one of your cities Deathdealer89. 
Back to Top
Darmon View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior


Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 315 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Oct 2012 at 23:57
Originally posted by DeathDealer89 DeathDealer89 wrote:

What is to stop ABSA from attacking RHY troops when it suits them after this agreement?

I believe that would be the NAP.
Back to Top
DeathDealer89 View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster


Joined: 04 Jan 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 944 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Oct 2012 at 00:06
Originally posted by Darmon Darmon wrote:

Originally posted by DeathDealer89 DeathDealer89 wrote:

What is to stop ABSA from attacking RHY troops when it suits them after this agreement?

I believe that would be the NAP.

You are aware that NAP's can be dropped right?  
Back to Top
Darmon View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior


Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 315 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Oct 2012 at 00:09
Originally posted by DeathDealer89 DeathDealer89 wrote:

Originally posted by Darmon Darmon wrote:

Originally posted by DeathDealer89 DeathDealer89 wrote:

What is to stop ABSA from attacking RHY troops when it suits them after this agreement?

I believe that would be the NAP.

You are aware that NAP's can be dropped right?  

Has ABSA broken a NAP in the past to attack RHY?
Has ABSA broken a NAP in the past to attack anyone?  

If the answer to both of those is no, what makes you think they would in the future?
If the answer to either is yes, then your paranoia may be founded in reality.


Edited by Darmon - 21 Oct 2012 at 00:09
Back to Top
Vanerin View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 05 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 418 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Oct 2012 at 03:05
DeathDealer,

In the past, Rhy did not remove from a square, against their agreement. What will stop them from doing that again? In a relationship of peace and friendship, there is always a sense of trust and with that trust, risk. And I applaud all parties involved for the steps they have taken towards peace. Well done!

~Vanerin
Back to Top
Alti (SkB) View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar

Joined: 20 Oct 2012
Location: Tor Carrock
Status: Offline
Points: 17 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Oct 2012 at 08:35
Originally posted by DeathDealer89 DeathDealer89 wrote:

RHY had and agreement with SKB.  

The agreements between SkB and RHY over resources were (before this treaty) purely bilateral.  

Originally posted by DeathDealer89 DeathDealer89 wrote:

ABSA attacked RHY troops after an agreement was made.  

Which they did without breaking any promises to RHY that I am aware of.

Originally posted by DeathDealer89 DeathDealer89 wrote:

What is to stop ABSA from attacking RHY troops when it suits them after this agreement?  

What is to stop anyone breaking any treaty when it suits  them?   It sounds as if your claims of Absa dishonesty are baseless.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.