| Author |
|
DeathDealer89
Postmaster
Joined: 04 Jan 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 944
|
Topic: Rhyagelle, Absaroke and Skeleton Boar Peace Agreem Posted: 21 Oct 2012 at 15:27 |
Bard wrote:
Gon wrote:
I'm just curious what would happen to any army that parked 2 squares from one of your cities Deathdealer89. |
Plus you didn't answer this one Deathdealer. I think we all know the answer though. |
Two sq's away is highly dependent. But if I had an agreement with the respective player about said sq then I would stick to whatever the agreement stipulated.
Besides other than sov issues 2 sqs away is about the safest place for an enemy army. With current game mechanics it would take them 3 times as long to attack.
|
 |
Bard
Wordsmith
Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 121
|
Posted: 21 Oct 2012 at 15:16 |
Gon wrote:
I'm just curious what would happen to any army that parked 2 squares from one of your cities Deathdealer89. |
Plus you didn't answer this one Deathdealer. I think we all know the answer though.
|
 |
LordOfTheSwamp
Forum Warrior
Joined: 23 May 2011
Location: Swamp of Fyrgis
Status: Offline
Points: 481
|
Posted: 21 Oct 2012 at 14:57 |
Congratulations to RHY, SkB and Absa.
Common sense, justice and peace is always good news for Illy's players. This is a very good bit of news.
|
|
"A boy is building sandcastles on a beach. You go and kick down his castle. You could say that it only reflects how you play with sandcastles. Others may think it reflects who you are." - Ander.
|
 |
Llyorn Of Jaensch
Postmaster
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Status: Offline
Points: 924
|
Posted: 21 Oct 2012 at 13:21 |
|
My answer is simple and obtuse.
I refer you to the other 47 threads on this topic!
I rest my case your honour. (Oh Im good. Damn Good!)
|
|
"ouch...best of luck." HonoredMule
|
 |
Deranzin
Postmaster
Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 845
|
Posted: 21 Oct 2012 at 13:07 |
Alti (SkB) wrote:
Which they did without breaking any promises to RHY that I am aware of.
|
So, if you call a third alliance to do the dirty work for you (as you did before by calling ABSA to clear 6000 troops - an army you could have cleared easily by yourselves), then they wouldn't be breaking any promises either, eh .?. 
|
 |
Mr Damage
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 598
|
Posted: 21 Oct 2012 at 10:04 |
|
Well done to those involved in this arrangement, as is the way with the forums, there's always the conspiracy theorists eager to eat at the fabric of something they can't control.
|
 |
Alti (SkB)
New Poster
Joined: 20 Oct 2012
Location: Tor Carrock
Status: Offline
Points: 17
|
Posted: 21 Oct 2012 at 08:35 |
DeathDealer89 wrote:
RHY had and agreement with SKB. |
The agreements between SkB and RHY over resources were (before this treaty) purely bilateral.
DeathDealer89 wrote:
ABSA attacked RHY troops after an agreement was made. |
Which they did without breaking any promises to RHY that I am aware of.
DeathDealer89 wrote:
What is to stop ABSA from attacking RHY troops when it suits them after this agreement? |
What is to stop anyone breaking any treaty when it suits them? It sounds as if your claims of Absa dishonesty are baseless.
|
 |
Vanerin
Forum Warrior
Joined: 05 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 418
|
Posted: 21 Oct 2012 at 03:05 |
DeathDealer,
In the past, Rhy did not remove from a square, against their agreement. What will stop them from doing that again? In a relationship of peace and friendship, there is always a sense of trust and with that trust, risk. And I applaud all parties involved for the steps they have taken towards peace. Well done!
~Vanerin
|
 |
Darmon
Forum Warrior
Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 315
|
Posted: 21 Oct 2012 at 00:09 |
DeathDealer89 wrote:
Darmon wrote:
DeathDealer89 wrote:
What is to stop ABSA from attacking RHY troops when it suits them after this agreement? |
I believe that would be the NAP. |
You are aware that NAP's can be dropped right? |
Has ABSA broken a NAP in the past to attack RHY? Has ABSA broken a NAP in the past to attack anyone?
If the answer to both of those is no, what makes you think they would in the future? If the answer to either is yes, then your paranoia may be founded in reality.
Edited by Darmon - 21 Oct 2012 at 00:09
|
 |
DeathDealer89
Postmaster
Joined: 04 Jan 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 944
|
Posted: 21 Oct 2012 at 00:06 |
Darmon wrote:
DeathDealer89 wrote:
What is to stop ABSA from attacking RHY troops when it suits them after this agreement? |
I believe that would be the NAP. |
You are aware that NAP's can be dropped right?
|
 |