Resistance against Ta2in// SS dealer |
Post Reply
|
Page <12345> |
| Author | ||
Solanar
Forum Warrior
Joined: 11 Jan 2015 Status: Offline Points: 312 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Aug 2017 at 00:44 |
|
YARR! officially supports bootleggers. I will gladly buy all the rum. Or steal. Either/or.
|
||
![]() |
||
Bulani
New Poster
Joined: 15 Sep 2015 Status: Offline Points: 26 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Aug 2017 at 00:31 |
|
|
Did TK just compare Ta2in to the Prohibition movement and the DeBeers scandal??? WAAAAA????
|
||
![]() |
||
Angrim
Postmaster General
Joined: 02 Nov 2011 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 1173 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Aug 2017 at 00:24 |
|
|
silversteel is so 2014.
|
||
![]() |
||
Ten Kulch
Postmaster
Joined: 20 Jan 2017 Location: Fellandire Status: Offline Points: 678 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 Jul 2017 at 23:17 |
|
Endorse is a strong word. It suggests that I enthusiastically embrace the objective, and that I am in a position where that would actually be relevant. Find interesting, yes. I find the De Beers diamond monopoly interesting, but I do not necessarily endorse it. I find the history of Prohibition to be interesting, but I do not endorse bootleggers. |
||
|
Check out my blog, Warmongering in Illyriad for self-defense techniques, military city construction, and PvP strategies.
|
||
![]() |
||
eowan the short
Postmaster
Joined: 03 Jan 2016 Location: UK Status: Online Points: 937 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 Jul 2017 at 22:58 |
|
|
Phelony, for the average player in the game, the big alliances did nothing to restrict their trade. If you wanted to trade in silversteel, all you needed to do was find someone willing to sell you it for less than you could sell it for. That's how I traded in SS. This meant that despite the fact that big alliances dominated the SS mines, it was a softer dominance which allowed other players in if they showed some initiative.
They were dominant but not in a way which excluded others.
|
||
![]() |
||
Phelony
New Poster
Joined: 03 Apr 2014 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 16 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 Jul 2017 at 22:45 |
|
|
eowan the short wrote:
the old alliances certainly were dominant but they were dominant in a way which was softer and made more sense. Hahahaha...., that is really funny, you have no idea! This account is new but I have played since 2012 and I know better as do a lot of others that set up in TBL! Oh yeah by the way, the sword, or should I say spear?, IS mightier than the pen in this game. Just ask AJ,... oh wait didn't he noob ring himself? As a side note, any of those 2-3 city noobs in either of the alliances that He-man says won't be sieged, should stay and play, to fight! It is really a lot of fun! You will learn what, or,....what not to do. Either way best of luck to both sides and try to have fun, this is a game ya know! |
||
![]() |
||
Princess Botchface
Wordsmith
Joined: 24 Sep 2014 Status: Offline Points: 122 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 Jul 2017 at 22:14 |
|
It's your alliance who made the rules and the threats to begin with. You could have just targeted Eowan because you know, he's Eowan and he does stuff like this all the time, I'm shocked he hasn't gotten ringed yet. If you're so worried about how n00bs feel, you could just... I dont know... not threaten them or condone them being threatened? Be all like, we're not going to attack anyone with 3 cities or less, that's not so hard and there's plenty of precedent for that and it still gives you space to enforce whatever it is you want to try to enforce. Also keep in mind that the war declaration was made by IKnights after the direct threats from TA2IN were made which is a perfectly rational response, I would have done the same, wouldn't you?. Eowan is at times a bumbling stooge, but it's a stretch to paint him as the bad guy here, which is what I interpreted from your comments that you're attempting to do. You guys do whatever the hell you want, but it's pretty rich to sit there and try to engage in some emotionally manipulative argument like this, you don't have any moral high ground to stand on. Personally I find this whole thing quite interesting and returning to the status quo is not something I condone nor do I condone He-Man being the Master of the Silver Steel. I wish that Eowan had not started the war in this way but it is what it is and it might just get some people to wake up and get interested in building armies and fighting which in my opinion is something Illy really needs. I hope MoV is successful in rallying people to their cause and I wish them the best of luck.
|
||
![]() |
||
Wartow
Postmaster
Joined: 20 May 2014 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 870 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 Jul 2017 at 19:25 |
|
+1 for the DeBeers analogy. In the real world a market monopoly is highly desired but often temporary. Illyriad provides limited resources and inferior alternatives to silver steel equipment, that is, no one can innovate a better resource that makes better gear. And so the monopoly can continue and still hold value. What to do about it? For most we live with the current situation as our need for silver steel is limited and can be met in the market even if the prices are inflated as a result of this artificial-scarcity. 10k's approach is a bit heavy handed and maybe too large in scope (go big or go home, right?) but as he said he wants to be disruptive and isn't looking to restore usual market forces. He also isn't looking for dev-approved solutions such as big NPC factions destroying encampments or King Siguard to challenge everyone to a tournament involving silver steel mines. So... what's next? And how are those currently outside of silver steel mine holdings to come together if they think there is something to this 10k endorsed effort? Are some hesitant to join without more information on the scope (loosen hold on SS mines in [given] region)? As a community we've agreed to a number of norms within the game, could skirmishes for SS mines be viewed as acceptable without invoking larger wars? Did I summarize well? Good luck to all... Wartow
|
||
|
||
![]() |
||
eowan the short
Postmaster
Joined: 03 Jan 2016 Location: UK Status: Online Points: 937 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 Jul 2017 at 18:16 |
|
|
I am not saying that elgean politics hasn't held sway in the past, it definitely has. However, in the current climate, elgean politics doesn't even seem to hold sway in elgea so any influence on BL is negligible.
I am doing something about the monopoly and I am encouraging those who also disagree with it to also take part.
|
||
![]() |
||
Ten Kulch
Postmaster
Joined: 20 Jan 2017 Location: Fellandire Status: Offline Points: 678 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 Jul 2017 at 17:34 |
|
If you think Elgean politics are not exercised with Elgean backing in the Broken Lands, you must be living under a rock. Every major war in the Broken Lands, and many minor ones, have been fought over exactly that conflict.
TA2IN is barring people from trading a single rare commodity. That rare commodity has almost always been mined by a few specific, powerful alliances who controlled sales and reaped large profits. If you find the TA2IN monopoly to your personal detriment, do something about it. Illyriad is a sandbox, people should react to the cartel as an interesting challenge in a video game, not something to whine about. Also, your current predicament is of your own making. You intentionally contradicted He-Man in a very public way, effectively daring him to make good on his threats to enforce the Silversteel trading ban. If you thought he was bluffing, you were wrong. If you didn't think he was bluffing, I have no idea why you challenged an elite military player to take military action without making the proper preparations first. Edited by Ten Kulch - 31 Jul 2017 at 17:35 |
||
|
Check out my blog, Warmongering in Illyriad for self-defense techniques, military city construction, and PvP strategies.
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page <12345> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |