RE vs. IRON War Stats |
Post Reply 
|
Page <1 910111213> |
| Author | |
Hyde 
Greenhorn 
Joined: 19 Dec 2017 Status: Offline Points: 70 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Posted: 30 Dec 2017 at 15:29 |
|
Since RE decided to grace us with their presence, I feel compelled to respond. So,
Rashidi siege: We broke the siege (as you said above) and the blockade forces were recalled. Hence why I said he recalled it. The siege is no longer there, I say it was a win. Elites: we resorted to use elites to save our remaining infantry as we had figured out that PK would be stupid enough to try to storm with 1,300 t1 bows. RE, you need a proper storm force for a siege, more than 12k defensive units! Villian: The loss is regretful, but the loss wasn't major. Kentbird: Some of her cav was used in the small forest, the ratios were as expected and we have no regrets. Killing cav behind walls: Congrats RE, you've killed some cavalry that was too far off to be helpful in real ops. In fact, I personally scouted all the cities that viper hit with 400 t2 scouts and got a report every time. Also very rich, isn't it? You celebrating about killing cav behind walls when aga killed a lot of PK's and jtk's when they tried to clear Mother of Darkness and your cav received 1:1 ratios with our kobolds. Each time you boost his defence score it boosts his ego you know, so be careful. RE's roster losses: PK didn't consult his whole alliance when declaring war, and many have jumped ship because of that. Look at your alliance map, nearly all your cities are in westmarch now. Those strendur towns? you used to have more there. Coanhara? I swear you had a very good cluster from a military player there.... Rashidi's motives: Seems that from your post, Rashidi is an RE sat or alt that you hid in Loki. Why? Because you were too scared to move it into RE and you have to hide it. Very dirty guys, going to that length against "toddlers"? As for your toddler comment: Yes, we are all illy toddlers. My account has been around for 2 months, similar to sigs. RE under PK has, and only ever will, pick on enemies it has a large advantage over because he is a coward. You have become a stale tournament alliance that declares on noob alliances near you (TheCo, SoE, Iron). You may want to bring up the fCrow v vCrow stuff, but really all RE members did there was bump up the roster and let PK waddle around shouting "This is my bit of BL!" while daddy Stukahh sat laughing and tugged on the kiddie reigns from time to time. If RE feels we are out of troops, then resend on Hillend. 3rd times a charm?
Edited by Hyde - 30 Dec 2017 at 15:33 |
|
 |
|
|
King Sigerius
Greenhorn
Joined: 11 Nov 2017 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 91 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Dec 2017 at 15:16 |
|
King Sig killed 30k of your troops and got 50k exp from those 5k stals :P Iron and myself have a lot more inf where that came from. Also I had a few more stals marching and got another decent kill after you failed your raze. http://prntscr.com/hu7cbj re cav defending on a forest? There was a decent amount of them. A few members seige timers ran out during the seige. Was a decent seige re I'll give you that, but all the troops in the world won't get you a raze if you if don't know how to use them. And of course some re member signs up to the forums to troll without using his real account name. Btw, Aga, I told you re was going to try and justify their loss. :P -The Big Mouth Toddler, who didn't have to send many troops because re sucks.
|
|
|
|
|
Dessembrae
Greenhorn
Joined: 21 Sep 2017 Status: Offline Points: 61 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Dec 2017 at 15:05 |
I lost my pacifier... Beware!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Dessembrae
Greenhorn
Joined: 21 Sep 2017 Status: Offline Points: 61 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Dec 2017 at 15:00 |
A lot less cavalry than you and pico used to to siege he-man in Kul-tar a couple years ago, wanna remind us how much you used then?
|
|
|
|
|
SPQR
New Poster 
Joined: 27 Dec 2017 Location: New york Status: Offline Points: 20 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Dec 2017 at 14:55 |
|
Correction the raze army was killed, but the siege armies reinforcing are marching home so the notion that the blockade or siege was broken by iron forces is hilarious.
They spent all infantry and cavalry forces they had on hand, they broke rashidi siege but left the block with over 200k troops fully intact while the RE reinforcements were fully intact I did not have 1 report of an army being destroyed apart from the small raze force . Rome and Rashidi are pleased by the results , once they were drained they stuck to small elites to try and break the siege, they could not even break the blockade numbering 50k troops which are marching home. Villan moves in cities for them to get cleared, kentbitd used all her cavalry on Rashidi while viperone used 5k knights that he has left after depleting his cavalry forces direct attacking Westmarch cities ! Don't be fooled by the scoreboard the loss has been due to RE removing inactives and isolated accounts and newbies since that's all that iron could siege. We had a siege in iron heartland for over 2 days , 3 days now while we recall.and did not have the numbers to break anything apart from Rashidi siege of t1 kobolts while he recalled with half his forces fully intact and ready to go ! Iron is like a todder have a big mouth but shows up with 5k stalwarts ? *ahem * king sigerius. Or hyde who.shows up with 2k Marshalls lol That's all I will comment , any concerns or questions can be directed to Jaxie or patience king have a blessed day 
|
|
|
|
|
Hyde
Greenhorn
Joined: 19 Dec 2017 Status: Offline Points: 70 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Dec 2017 at 14:10 |
|
More than a little, less than a lot
|
|
|
|
|
DeliciousJosh
Forum Warrior 
Joined: 14 Jun 2012 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 417 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Dec 2017 at 13:15 |
|
How much cav was used to kill the forest sieges?
|
|
|
PublicRelations HumanResources |
|
|
|
|
Hyde
Greenhorn
Joined: 19 Dec 2017 Status: Offline Points: 70 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Dec 2017 at 13:01 |
|
So thought I'd add a quick update for all those interested and to explain the rise in the stats: - Early on the 28th Iron came under fire from a siege from RE, again against Spektor's Hillend I and also a siege from Rashidi of Loki against Karl Aegis's Rime Berta. - Rashihi's siege was first to fall, being recalled and was a very impressive siege force from a single player. The motive behind sending the siege is still unknown, and in response to this Iron declared war on Loki. - The RE siege was dealt with second, as it was the smaller of the two sieges. 'Hillend I' was under siege for a two day period, before PK's 1,300 archer storm force was killed at the gates. As I am writing this the siege forces are being recalled from around Hillend. - All forces used to kill the sieges were Iron troops. - Iron continue to move cities into Aindara.  |
|
|
|
|
Mafro
Forum Warrior
Joined: 01 Apr 2012 Status: Offline Points: 312 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Dec 2017 at 18:52 |
It's a good thought...and a shame there's not an easier way to get accurate tallies of losses on each side. In this case, if I understand you correctly, it would need to be done daily (from the Battles Yesterday section), and that would only grab the "top" battles of the day, leaving out any and all others. It would also require a fair amount of copying and pasting as well as some intelligent restructuring of the data each day to group it appropriately. In the case of the data I have been posting, to get it literally requires me to copy and paste twice (once for RE, once for IRON) from the Alliance Leaderboard into a spreadsheet that automagically does all the other calculations. It takes about 30 seconds. In fact, it takes far longer to format the forum post than it does to grab the data. That being the case, if someone else wants to sign up to grab daily battle stats for the major alliances that are at war, be my guest....
|
|
|
|
|
Whakomatic
New Poster
Joined: 07 May 2014 Status: Offline Points: 12 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Dec 2017 at 07:42 |
|
I suggest you sum the numbers from here by alliance:
and the defense page. That will get you actual losses on each side.
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1 910111213> |
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
SPQR wrote: