RE Stance...

---We still control the outcome of the war, to what length you and Coal2 wanna drive the destruction home is in your hands. 

Now you have given us objectives.  We should at least return the favor of destorying every isolated, overwhelmed satellite city and account to be found, to the last fragment of existence.  Then, as battle lines are formed, perhaps we'll consider eventually stopping some point short of the total annihilation your side has so recklessly and indiscriminately sought from the start of this war.
--- You should return the favor?? You lack the forces, if you didnt you would ask those isolated to come to individual terms of surrender. Something you (H?) have done in the past. If annihilation was what we were seeking, then there would be no need for anyone to surrender. The Choice remains your own good sir.

But after watching alliances and players with whom we previously warred on a limited and reasonable scale and afterward built peaceful, positive relations join this battle purely for the profit, glory, and our utter destruction - I can't imagine why we should suffer such coexistence again.
---Limited to whenever your greed and bloodlust was fulfilled. Reasonable in your eyes alone, because as victors you set the scale. The alliances that declared had their own reasons and motives Im sure but while you seem to be pouring some kool aid, Im gonna have to pass this time around. 
But go ahead and offer platitudes here, while you harvest inactives (or claimed inactives), non-combatants, and whatever non-key players are handy.  It's far easier than focusing your efforts on tactical objectives designed to disrupt continued war operations, and it looks really good on paper.  It would even work if you were up against mewling, easily spooked cowards.
---Non-key players?..... Shade values every active member in its alliance so if you could give me a list of the "key players" Id be most grateful.