Print Page | Close Window

Grandpa... tell us about the war

Printed From: Illyriad
Category: The World
Forum Name: Politics & Diplomacy
Forum Description: If you run an alliance on Elgea, here's where you should make your intentions public.
URL: http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=5450
Printed Date: 17 Apr 2022 at 04:38
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Grandpa... tell us about the war
Posted By: Dwrwd
Subject: Grandpa... tell us about the war
Date Posted: 17 Feb 2014 at 15:55
I have been playing Illy for only a couple of months so I obviously had no involvement in the war nor any particular sympathy for either side. And yet, as I believe is the case for many other newbies, I would like to know more about it.

In the hope that this thread will not become, as it often seems to happen, a surrogate battlefield for those contenders who evidently did not get enough of their share of fighting in the real war (and by real I obviously mean fake, this is a game you know), I ask you to describe the events of this war as you would if you were telling a story to a child. After all, aren't we all newbies like children needing support and guidance ;-)

This doesn't mean you have to spare us the gory details. We already know about the monster who lives in the closet that will take us away if we don't eat all our supper or harvest in your sov. So if you want to tell us of how you razed a city after butchering the 10k spearmen defending it, it's ok, we can take it. Just please mind the language.

You are welcome to describe the large scale strategic manoeuvers of the alliances, the cloak and dagger games going on behind the scenes, or even just a small episode that you may have witnessed first hand (like the siege of a single city, for example).

Pleeeease grandpa, one more story before I go to bed.

Edit @ killer poodle: we don't want comments about other people's posts. They're boooring!
If you don't like what other people said, just tell us your own side of the story. That is the full story, as you think it should be told.

Re-edit @ Deranzin: your philosophical approach to the causes of this war is interesting but maybe a bit too aloof for kids like us to comprehend. We really just want to hear a fun story :)




Replies:
Posted By: Miklabjarnir
Date Posted: 17 Feb 2014 at 16:40
I am a bystander, and despite of the size of the war most are actually outside it. I am a profiteer, selling my goods to whoever is willing or desperate enough to pay my inflated prices. Again, not unusual in times of war. The entire economy of Elgea would collapse if people did not use enormous amounts of gold and resources to prepare for wars and then using them up during the war.

As seems to be the usual way with great wars, this one started (or at least got out of hand) because somebody was not happy with the result of the previous war. The previous war was called many things, but it seems many have agreed to call it The Consone War after the main instigator. They were a group who had very strong views about the right way to behave in Elgea and about the evils of alliances with other ideas getting big and powerful. For all practical purposes they were annihilated in that war.

As with other great wars, the losing side was left with a number of grudges. The peace treaties left them with a long list of cities they had to give up, either to be taken over or razed by the winners. And even worse for some, their philosophy had not prevailed. Some were making secret plans behind the scenes, and many were waiting for somebody to kill the Archduke//////// do something to give them a pretext for action. 

I hope some of the cooler heads both among the coalition and the unnamed axis crow-eagle / militant pacifist crusaders / whatever will provide historians with documents and events about the early stages of this conflict before they are forgotten.


Posted By: KillerPoodle
Date Posted: 17 Feb 2014 at 17:53
Originally posted by Miklabjarnir Miklabjarnir wrote:

For all practical purposes they were annihilated in that war.


By what criteria?  Have you seen how many of those alliances are in the current war?


-------------
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM

"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill


Posted By: Miklabjarnir
Date Posted: 17 Feb 2014 at 18:03
In my book a confederation is annihilated when it dissolves, even if many of the previous members are relatively unhurt. Just like an alliance is destroyed if the members leave it, even if they are more or less unharmed.


Posted By: scaramouche
Date Posted: 17 Feb 2014 at 18:22
It is wrong for Mikla to suggest that the current war was started because of old grudges from the consone war...although I will not deny a lot of ex consone players, wanted revenge (if that is the right word).
There is no way one or two ex consone alliances persuaded other non consone/axis alliances to indulge in an almost global server war just because they hold grudges.

Myself being an ex consone player was looking for an excuse to have another go at the axis and was undeniably over the moon when this war started.
There are alliances in this war that had no part in the consone war and therefore have their own reasons..but as in most cases the truth will always be torn and ripped apart and turned into spin/lies and denials.
As much as I respect the OP'S interest in wanting to know more details of this current exchange. this will turn into a flame fest.
I would recommend you read through the past threads on this subject to get an idea of what I say.


-------------
NO..I dont do the Fandango!


Posted By: Nokigon
Date Posted: 17 Feb 2014 at 18:32
Actually I quite like the premise of this thread. I will tell you, then, about the events leading to the surrender of the dominion.

The three alliances which comprise the dominion are TO, TCol and DB (my alliance). At this time, TCol were being the main focus of enemy attention out of the three. After a failed attempt to siege a city belonging to Asjeff, they were the weakest out of the three of us, too. In comparison to peacetime troop levels, DB was probably best off. As such, I requested and then rejected peace terms in an attempt to attract attention onto us and away from TCol; at the same time, the Dominion engaged ourselves in a last ditch effort to siege Ely, a city belonging to Asjeff- the rook of nCrow. It was a gamble that we could withstand the enemy; we would either break them, or be broken ourselves.

The ploy to draw the enemy into attacking us was a success. EE put down a number of sieges against us; perhaps underestimating us, we were able to break the sieges which we chose to retaliate against. The turn in our fortunes came with a mass set of sieges against Sergito. The first siege against him was very nearly prevented from ever arriving- we stacked the siege square with reinforcements, and had we put down another 5k or so the siege would not have landed. Such is life. However, the siege army was badly damaged and it could not get Asa Wright down to siegable size. The next couple of sieges were less successful, and Siparia and Three Pools fell in quick succession. Asia Wright itself and Diego Martin were crippled. Our last reserves were used trying to defeat these sieges; our only other troops were going to Ely. If we couldn't win at Ely, then, defeat would be inevitable.

The siege at Ely was a failure. The Dominion were so badly weakened by war by now that even the combined efforts of the three of us was not enough to hold off against nCrow. Even our direct siege attacks were defeated by the reinforcements in the city. With no troops and sieges landing daily, victory had become impossible. We therefore took the decision to surrender.


Posted By: Brandmeister
Date Posted: 17 Feb 2014 at 18:59
Although I think Miklabjarnir gave a decent account of the Trove War grudges, I disagree with his Archduke Ferdinand analogy (note for history buffs: take it elsewhere, this isn't a WWI history thread). Both major wars had one side openly looking for a pretext, and the other side purposely and flagrantly giving it to them. There were many points along the road to war where both sides could have defused the situation, and instead opted for escalation. I would describe both server wars as voluntary conflicts between opponents who had long known they were going to war. The need for a pretext is one of the bizarre things about Illyriad--apparently nobody is willing to admit that in a video game, you don't need an elaborate reason to start a battle.

The strange thing about the current war, in my own opinion, is the apparent number of empty accounts. Both sides seem to have huge armies of sat accounts. I would speculate that each major combatant (the well known players, not the peons) is controlling at least 4-6 accounts. There seems to be evidence that several players are running many more than 6. Market prices have actually fallen on many commodities, simply because the fighting accounts are supplied by many other permasat feeder accounts. I used to think that permasat accounts were a minor problem (and I maintain they are not the cause of map crowding), but the power they allow individuals to project is unfair to newer players, simply because the oldest alliances collect the most big permasat military accounts.

This war is also characterized by the annihilation of isolated accounts. While some players were allowed to surrender, others were hunted down even after they left their alliance and the war. I think that from this point forward, Illyriad will be a more brutal game with mega-alliances acting like traditional MMO warlords. I don't anticipate that Broken Lands will change that, whenever it might arrive.

In short, I believe this war is when Illyriad became like other MMORTS. It might have been inevitable; I'm not even sure it's regrettable. It is what it is.


Posted By: Elmindra
Date Posted: 17 Feb 2014 at 21:41
Now that is exactly what this thread needed Noki, nicely done.  In that spirit, I will tell our side of that specific story.

After finishing our campaign on H? in the north, EE decided to move south and east against the Dominion who had been stalwartly entrenched in battle for some time against our allies.  After a round of long distance sieges and reinforcement operations against The Colonist Empire, we decided that another direction was needed.  Fearing that outside influence was hardening TCol's resolve, it was determined that a focused campaign against another Dominion force was required.

Scouting parties were sent, and forces were taken measure.  But either by our pride or by our past conquests, our first attacks were met with both superior resistance and proper planning.  Our first siege was cleared out of a group of buildings, but not without a large number of swords that I determined that Dark Blight could not afford to lose.  A large scale siege was sent to a mountain range, but some armies arrived too late to prevent the ambush set from destroying a good number of our siege engines.  Once the bulk of forces arrived it was apparent the enemy could not dislodge us, but neither could we storm and raze the town of Asa Wright.

After gaining a proper measure of our enemy, and with it a proper respect, we landed more sieges against their General Sergito.  Towns were razed and enemy troops were killed in terrain not favorable to them due to their previous loss of swords.  Troops arrived from all members of DB who still had them at home, but it was too little too late.  What was later learned was that the enemy had troops marching to their doom in a last ditch attack against an allied leader.

Surrender quickly followed after these battles, but indeed the greatest respect was gained for our foes in Dark Blight.  They taught us to not gauge the strength of our foes upon the ease of earlier victories, and bloodied our troops in a way we had not seen up to that point.

On a side note and completely out of storyteller character, nicely done Noki in both the on the field showing and in the spirit of the above post.  You and your alliance definately have earned the respect of EE, and hopefully you have continued growth and success.


-------------


Posted By: Deranzin
Date Posted: 17 Feb 2014 at 21:59
Originally posted by Elmindra Elmindra wrote:

  You and your alliance definately have earned the respect of EE, and hopefully you have continued growth and success.


/facepalm Sick

Anyway, to the topic ... the simple explanation (since longer explanations will eventually lead to quibbling  ) is this :

Any long-standing status-quo that is trying to please as many people as possible is bound to displease most people or eventually turn everyone against it and illyriad was no exception to this rule ...  such is the way of the world and the nature of our species ...

What IS amusing in that habit of our existence though is that the next condition that we strive for and hope that it will be better (or more beneficent ), usually turns out to rarely be like that ... LOL

If you enjoy the ironies of life, stick around and you are going to have grand fun Big smile




Posted By: The Duke
Date Posted: 18 Feb 2014 at 01:11
First and foremost Id like to respectfully disagree also with Mik on the issue of Consone pressing their views ect and the reasons of that war. Also I will point out that Consone as a whole may have been destroyed however I felt most alliances were given reasonable terms to surrender from the conflict aside from maybe EE and a few other miscellaneous terms. 

~Prior to the onset of the war I had my alt account in NC, where I fought Bane and Insanity Inc. I  enjoyed the friendships and warlike play NC and its members have had since shortly after their journey began. Being part of a small close knit group that's active everyday and was something I had not experienced yet in my tenure here. I spent more time on my alt than I did on my main account. It was around this time my brother in RL started playing and I needed to make a switch from elf to orc. Knowing this was possibly the last time Id ever actually go through with the move I abandoned my alt and in doing so left NC. In the meantime I was setting Shade up to be a competitive military style alliance built for tourneys and Veteran Illy players. War seemed to be on the brink- It seemed as though blood was on on the breath of everyone. The air was becoming thick and whatever each alliances choke point was their tolerance was less and less. The fact that we had no tourney for ages meant illy was full of troop counts, negative gold, and people willing and ready to prove their mettle. 
War broke loose and with them- many major armies that had been horded for the better half of a year. Illyriad seen battles for the record books, unknown men and women carving their names in with the Gods, and those that were once great proved why, or they were cast away soon to be forgotten like so many before them. 
Shades initial targets were those closest to them in Kal Tirikan and freemorn. We knew they were active, and if not were actively sat based on the last tourney. Our primary focus were the freemorn cluster of Harmless. After being evenly matched or out matched the previous tourney in that region we knew it would be an uphill battle. Not only did Harmless display prowess in the last tourney but they did so coming fresh off a war. Our initial Sieges were met with Heavy resistance. John 5420, Leanthar, and alas Tordenkofffen did not disappoint. Their armies were heavy and well led, dealing a 2-1 kill death ratio at nearly every hit. This is when my time in NC really helped me. NC was second to none at one thing. War. To win a war you needed to be active, and timing was most crucial. I had a meeting with our strategist and trusted generals setting sieges in favorable terrain along with precise timing. With every siege we landed we would launch a follow up siege shortly after. It became apparent that with the continued Barrage and Shades superior sov/cities in the area we were making considerable headway. At some point some of our members lost the sense of containment I had hoped we could keep, destroying one account to the last city, and others losing 4-5. I then reached out to H? and after a week or so reeling in some of our members we moved on from the freemorn region which had proven broken and bloodier than I would have ever imagined. We continue to march, farther and farther south. The enemy has regrouped and I can only  imagine the pain we have felt thus far is minute in comparison to what lies ahead. ~


-------------
"Our generation has had no Great Depression, no Great War. Our war is spiritual. Our depression is our lives."


Posted By: Miklabjarnir
Date Posted: 18 Feb 2014 at 02:38
I totally agree with Brandmeister that my Archduke Ferdinand-analogue was a bit stretched, but my intention was to indicate that we are talking about wars both sides wanted. I also firmly believe that the current war would not have happened except for the previous one. The peace conditions may have been fair, but the ideological issues were not resolved.

I think much good information is coming out of this thread. I do not doubt that old alliances have a number of accounts sat for a very long time, but I do not see that as necessarily bad. I personally know of at least one account which has been sat for the better part of a year before the owner got enough RL breathing room to come back and take control again. Besides, only people totally living their life in the game will be able to effectively sit more than a couple of accounts. 

Even without having many "permasat" accounts, an old alliance will have huge stockpiles inherited from players who have left. With safe storage in hubs, this is possibly enough to keep fighting for months.

My impressions from the market is that the war has increased regional differences. People at war may not have the time to shop around or having stuff shipped over half the map. This is good for those of us who have invested in many traders, and could open for more arbitrage deals.
 
Another thing is that I believe you have to use untold amounts of Prestige if you commit all out to a major war. That is, obviously, very beneficial to everybody. As long as Illy has income, they will be able to improve it.

I both hope and believe Brandmeister is wrong about Illy becoming like other games. From what I can see, only those who want to take part in the current war (or stick with their friends) are involved in it. This kind of split is good for everybody. Elgea will have a crisis if everybody choose the same style, whether it be peaceful or warlike.


Posted By: Angrim
Date Posted: 18 Feb 2014 at 06:03
Originally posted by Miklabjarnir Miklabjarnir wrote:

I totally agree with Brandmeister that my Archduke Ferdinand-analogue was a bit stretched, but my intention was to indicate that we are talking about wars both sides wanted.
i have no war stories to add to the thread, but i know enough about the events leading up to the war to say that there is no single cause, that alliances even on the same side have different reasons for participating, and that not all alliances involved (and certainly not all players) wanted war.

this thread will be much more fun if we can keep the speculations about causes and motives out of it. thanks to Miklabjarnir, Nokigon, Elmindra and The Duke for their respective tales. if anyone has a disagreement with something said by another player, let him tell his own tale to set things right.


Posted By: Nokigon
Date Posted: 18 Feb 2014 at 10:56
Thank you, Elmindra. That fills in a couple of gaps I had. EE handled themselves very well there, but I don't regret the first siege. We may have lost a lot of infantry, but it was on good terrain-buildings- and it was to defend an extremely active and fast growing player. 

I have quite a few more stories that I could tell you all. I think that I'll talk to you about the best of the enemy players that we fought. 

When we started the war, I had a shortlist of the players who I wanted to target in our local region. Top of this list was Taelin, and we narrowly failed to siege his city Sinde. We did at least damage it badly, and indeed it never regained the same level of population. The other person whom we were interested in neutralising was sevenonefour.

Earlier, we had tried to attack sevenonefour to take out his armies. When we did this, we discovered something annoying. He just doesn't sleep. Whenever we attacked him, he would simply dodge our attacks, no matter what time of day we were sending them at, and hit us back. As such, we decided that we ought to siege his city. We had excellent coordination on this particular siege. We had enough reinforcements to handle what we knew vCrow had in the immediate vicinity, and we were confident we could pull this siege off.

But when the troops arrived, one of my more inexperienced people hit siege instead of occupy. A second before Sabre Wulf's siege arrived, another siege with no catapults turned up. You can imagine my frustration. We never actually returned to siege 714, as Bane had joined the war by this point which made sieges in our local area untenable. However, our direct siege attacks still pretty much levelled the town.This, as it turned out, annoyed sevenonefour. He then went on a bit of a rampage.

He targetted Carl Zeis and Vertigo. Using direct siege attack, he levelled four cities belonging to Vertigo and two belonging to Carl Zeis. Having done this, he turned his attention onto sieges. BANE had previously tried and failed to siege Aemonn's fifth city, but 714 tried again and, this time, succeeded. We hit back hard at his capital with a wave of direct siege attacks, almost levelling the entire city, but this didn't stop him from continuing to fight hard. He was the sender of the siege against Sergito's Siparia. In this siege, Sergito had some 12k T2 spears. He dodged an attack from Hyo, and in the time when his troops were moving 714 hit raze, and succeeded. Presumably, the phalanxes were left in the ether.

Take this as a shout out to a great player. 714 did not have the largest armies I have ever encountered, but he uses them better than anyone else I have ever seen. Now I'm not at war with him and I'm not obliged to dislike him... kudos!


Posted By: geofrey
Date Posted: 18 Feb 2014 at 14:37
I was originally the leader of a small merry band of Lords and Ladies that called themselves Affirmative Action. We were originally stationed in Keshalia but had relocated many settlements to Southern Zanpur. We have made friends with neighbors in Keshalia and Zanpur that included several Consone alliances, as well as The Colony before the days of the DarkStar Dominion. 

When it became apparent that Harmless? had orchestrated a large scale attempt to dismantle Consone, I became concerned for my friends. Doubtly so when Kale Weathers agreed to put The Colony on Harmless's side. 

Affirmative Action was not part of Consone, but we had a vested interest in keeping a friendly presence around us. As a result we began contributing to Consone military efforts to prevent loss of cities. As history will tell us, this did not go well. 

My alliance's initial surrender during the Great Trove War. 

http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/aa-bsh-conflict_topic4646_page1.html?KW=affirmative+action

Inbetween The Great trove War and the current War, I agreed to a proposal set forth by Boru to merge Affirmative Action and ViCX. This new VICX created a consolidated geographical powerhouse in the southeastern hemisphere. 

And then the current war began. 


-------------
http://elgea.illyriad.co.uk/a/p/45534" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: John Louis
Date Posted: 20 Feb 2014 at 14:48
Some of you may find this relevant and/or interesting: http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/a-short-treatise-on-the-early-history-of-illyriad_topic5454.html


Posted By: Wolfgangvondi
Date Posted: 20 Feb 2014 at 16:29
Great stuff from Nokigon and Elmindra. No boring crapy talk. Just warriors shareing ther storys in the field. Realy great. plz give us more.

I was one of the Vcrows in the  Taelin siege city defence. lost basicaly all defence troops i still had left. Anyway, i think The city was too close to a certain Vcrow Orc (not me by the way) that quicky was able to deploy massive amounts of defence, making life for the attaker's very hard.

more story's plz : )



-------------
http://elgea.illyriad.co.uk/a/p/21645" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: Praetor Nistiner
Date Posted: 20 Feb 2014 at 19:42
It`s  good to read all these stories without people insulting each other... very nice Clap

-------------
Tutela 111-Sir Bradly is surprisingly nice. SSH :D


Posted By: Miklabjarnir
Date Posted: 20 Feb 2014 at 19:45
Originally posted by Angrim Angrim wrote:

... i have no war stories to add to the thread, but i know enough about the events leading up to the war to say that there is no single cause, that alliances even on the same side have different reasons for participating, and that not all alliances involved (and certainly not all players) wanted war.

...

That is true, but there will always be some who are exceptions without that invalidating the overall picture.
In the case of the consone war, I was dragged into it because of a confederation agreement. While such agreements can provide small members of small alliances a level of security in case somebody big and scary should get nasty, they also increase the risk of being dragged into something.

While it was scary to suddenly see big, red cities all around my neighbourhood, it was also very interesting and educational to become a tiny part of the biggest war machine Elgea had seen up to then.

I never saw Illyriad as an interesting wargame, and never built much in the way of armies. I have, however, some RL experience with command control - being trained as an S-3 in the Home Guards. Anyhow, I was put in charge of the coordination of our Northern area. 

Our first action was against Quackers, who had build a new city placed to support attacks against one of ours. In an attempt to confuse us, he kept changing the name. Not very effective, since we used coordinates, but I remember the place as Bobby McGee. 

The operations were not very successful for any side. We could never muster enough strength in that area to destroy the place, and they were not able to make any inroads into our territory. The area just was not important enough to either side, and by the time we had built up enough strength to start a siege the war was over.

The most impressive action I took part in was a siege run by TVM. I received a message saying:
From: Bonfyr Verboo [TVM]
Subject: FW: ALLIANCE WIDE WAR ORDERS
Received: 09 Jan 2013 03:12
Original Message:

 

ORDERS
 
Our next siege on The Return will be landing on the SW square, 490/720 @ 04:36 am, Jan 16, Server Time

Boy, that was some siege! I sent my few small defensive armies in the area to defend the siege, and received combat reports showing that numerous big attacks on it were shrugged off with minimal losses. 

Shortly after the announced time a hundred armies from a dozen alliances had joined the defense of the siege. My armies of a couple thousand were among the smallest, many were ten times that strength. Some were really big. I know bigger sieges have happened in other places, but this was a really impressive show. Timing and coordination was perfect. The combat reports were many pages long. Unfortunately, I did not make an external copy and the IGM-system auto-deleted them.

The city disappeared before I even had time to recall my armies. Luckily, no enemies were around to hit the stragglers.

I still do not think warfare in Illyriad is very interesting, but on the operational level it makes up for a lot of tactical crudeness and lack of real strategically important resources and chokepoints. It reminds me of long nights in the staff tent sending and receiving orders and reading the situation map, so I suppose it suits people who can use a lot of time on the game.





Posted By: Nokigon
Date Posted: 20 Feb 2014 at 20:45
Originally posted by Wolfgangvondi Wolfgangvondi wrote:

I was one of the Vcrows in the  Taelin siege city defence. lost basicaly all defence troops i still had left. Anyway, i think The city was too close to a certain Vcrow Orc (not me by the way) that quicky was able to deploy massive amounts of defence, making life for the attaker's very hard.

Was that the siege of Sinde?


Posted By: HonoredMule
Date Posted: 21 Feb 2014 at 00:44
Confederations do carry an inherent risk of getting alliances dragged into wars for the wrong reasons, but much of it can be mitigated with careful drafting of terms.  Harmless went to great lengths to ensure that neither we nor our allies would be pulled into the wrong side of an unjust war in the name of honor.

http://arcanum-illyria.com/wiki/Elgea:Harmless/Treaties" rel="nofollow - http://arcanum-illyria.com/wiki/Elgea:Harmless/Treaties

I actually wrote up these terms myself, and am quite proud of them - they have held up admirably.  They couldn't be used to get us out of the current war, but nor should they even if it proves our downfall.  You have to stand for something, else you're worth nothing.

My story is a bit political, but those are the stories a politician has.  To make this less personal, I'll avoid the use of enemy names and other specifics.  Before Harmless entered the war, NC was already entrenched in a conflict.  They were our allies, but they were fighting with alliances of comparable size over conflicts that did not directly involve us.  As per our treaty, they did not request our aid in a fight they could handle and in which they were not clearly the victims.  But then larger alliances started dogpiling onto NC (some honoring treaties, others just because they wanted to or had old unrelated grudges) and their prospects for mere survival became dim, let alone victory.  Now they did request our help, which we gave...first as mediators.

The number of forces threatening to get involved against NC was rapidly escalating to a scale that would bring in absolutely everyone on our side and ensure there would be no winners no matter the outcome.  Furthermore, we (supposedly) had allies on both sides of the conflict.  At this point, we believed the only tie our false ally had to the other side was through loose confederation between supposedly peaceful alliances - we would later learn they their supposed ire had more to do with positioning themselves to break an alliance they no longer wanted, and very little to do with that treaty.  But for now, we did our best to act in good faith toward both our allies despite increasingly belligerent complaints from the least-involved party in the whole affair (so far).

Both sides had grievances, and some of them were legitimate, again for both sides - we could not have taken either side militarily with complete confidence that we were acting honorably.  Luckily, both sides of the original conflict were also willing to negotiate.  Apologies were made, promises offered, and we stood on the doorstep of peace.  But the larger alliances siding against NC - notably those with no legitimate grievances against NC but a bigger plan that had more to do with Harmless - did not want peace.  In particular, our large false ally on the other side specifically wanted the war to continue and for Harmless to be drawn into it, and had solicited the aid of alliances which had surrendered in the previous war.  As far as I'm able to determine without speculating on deeper motives, the (new) leader of this alliance had become convinced that Harmless had adopted a policy of destroying whatever alliance was number 2 and that we'd be coming for him next, despite our ties and ironclad reputation for fair dealing with all past and present allies.  Any appearance of such should also be weighed against how alliances tended to act specifically toward us when they gained the number 2 position, but I digress.  An influential leader stepped in to curtail the negotiations and snatched diplomatic defeat from the jaws of victory.

All this had taken quite some time and still more large alliances were tearing into NC - their situation was dire.  At this point any question of honor or obligation on Harmless's part was quite far removed from the equation.  NC had negotiated in good faith and tried to reach peace, but that option had been removed by the other side.  We still wanted to avoid a world war, and so we sought out some way to take the pressure off NC without the ultimate escalation.  One of the alliances declaring against NC had no personal stake in the current conflict and furthermore had been involved in the Consone war against us.  The terms of their surrender in that war had included a clause stating they could not engage in any hostile activity against Harmless or any of our allies for 6 months, or the agreement would be void.  As luck would have it, they were still just inside that window.  We used this technicality to declare on just them, hoping that this would satisfy our supposedly conflicted false ally and perhaps even convince them of our unwillingness to turn them into enemies.

But of course it wouldn't, since this ally was actually orchestrating the whole conflict which at this point would normally have been resolved peacefully even had half the major supporting alliances on their side not existed.  Our tightrope act ended in vain, and shortly after this everyone even remotely involved declared on us and all our allies - alongside quite a few forces that were not involved at all.  From that point, we've faced an overwhelming enemy filled with (as far as I can measure) equal parts false allies who betrayed us and/or were deceived into turning against us, past enemies seeking revenge, and completely neutral forces just joining in for the carnage and profit, with one possible exception in the form of a small alliance which voiced grievance over Harmless previously declining to forge an alliance with them.

And looking back at the whole sordid affair, I rather think that last tiny detail - the alliance so deeply offended that we politely declined their overtures (though to hear them tell it we'd insulted their dead mother) - is the strangest of all.  But that is the sort of capriciousness by which a leading alliance is judged.  Beware positions of power, for when in one, there is no mark too small to be counted against you.


-------------
"Apparently, quoting me is a 'thing' now."
- HonoredMule


Posted By: Aurordan
Date Posted: 21 Feb 2014 at 06:36
Wow.  What a condescending load of crap.

First of all, omitting alliance names doesn't really mean anything if you're just going to specifically identify them all anyway.  And more convenient secret alliances that you're going to use to justify your actions after the fact.  Fun.

In the spirit of trying to get this thread back on track, I'll give an outline of how I came to be in this war.  Honored, I know you've spent a long time cultivating that impressive ego of yours, so you might not want to read this.  Consider yourself warned.

It had nothing to do with Harmless?.  

I spend my early alliance life in an alliance called the Order of Consequence.  It would eventually collapse due to internal drama, and mostly migrate to Amicitia, which would dissolve for much the same reason, with a dose of inactivity thrown in.  Still, I made a lot of friends in these alliances, and many Amicitia members ended up in either House of Plantagenet(PLAN), where I ended up, or in Insane Knight(BANE). 

BANE was(and is) an innovative alliance in many ways, but mainly in that they are a mercenary alliance, they fought for gold.  This had at the time always been contained to assistance in clearing inactives and tournaments, basically professionalization of the activities even the most peaceful alliance engages in.  Unfortunately for BANE, this was Heresy(tm).  Night Crusaders would strike at them under cover of a tournament, using a pretext so weak as to be farcical.    

Would I make myself a Heretic(tm)?  Was I already?  These where my friends that had just been attacked, and I knew may of them had a lot in common with me.  

The second concern growing in my thoughts was the Darkstar Dominion.  The largest militant bloc in the game, they where a force expanding in influence and belligerence every day.  The Dominion threw their weight around in ways Consone and Crows would never have imagined, eventually culminating in an unproved attack by one of their member alliances on my own alliance, PLAN.  Backed up with the threat of attack by the Dominion and H?, should anyone come to our assistance.  Of course we knew our allies wouldn't be any match for such powers, and asked them all to stay out.  I know it may sound like I'm trying to make us look noble and selfless here, I assure you that isn't the case.  The math would simply never have worked in our favor.  So we took some damage, fought as best we could, and eventually made a barely tolerable peace with our attackers so they could prepare to fight their new war.  That would be the current one.  

NC, it turned out, had found a few more Heretics(tm) than they could handle, and the Dominion was dutifully riding in to bail them out.  I think it goes without saying at this point I would have preferred to see them lose, but more to the point, could I stand to see them win?  To come out of another war with even more arrogance and aggression, and even less to hold them in check?  

No.

And that is the story of how I found myself in the first non-neutral alliance of my Illyrian life, with Eagle's Eyrie(Who're great!), at war with Harmless? only by virtue of their deliberate decision to aid these factions who embodied all they claimed to oppose.  So maybe, when you're trying to figure out how you got here, don't look at the people who wouldn't support you, look at who you continued to support.  

 


Posted By: HonoredMule
Date Posted: 21 Feb 2014 at 16:49
I'm sorry you feel that way Aurordan.  I am willing and able to believe that you speak earnestly and openly based on the information and perspective available to you.  Apparently the same courtesy cannot be extended to me, and I'm just being sanctimonious.

Harmless's position as mediator gave us a lot of detailed background on NC's conflicts and if we were misled by NC spinning fanciful tales, it was very masterfully done.  Of all the leaders in Harmless, my absence since the Consone war made me the only one with practicaly no ties to NC.  At the onset of my involvement I was very skeptical of their position, yet they managed to convince me their blame was limited, and then demonstrated willingness to make amends and change where the blame was theirs.  But it is not my position to expose the details which were shared in confidence.

So all I can really offer you is this: both parties which were actually involved in that conflict were willing and ready to end it peacefully.  It was someone like you, acting with an attitude like yours, which prevented that from happening.

And it worked out brilliantly for someone who couldn't have directly cared less about the whole thing.  Some day you're going to realize you were used by someone who no longer has need of you, and I don't think you'll be too happy about that either.


-------------
"Apparently, quoting me is a 'thing' now."
- HonoredMule


Posted By: Aurordan
Date Posted: 21 Feb 2014 at 19:18
You're not just being sanctimonious, and I'm sure a lot of it really is how you feel, but but you do seem to believe that this whole war revolves around your alliance and that everyone on the other side is either jealous of you or in it for the sake of destruction, somehow.  

And clearly, all parties weren't willing to end it peacefully.  As for the indiscernible future, thank you for your concern, but I think I'll keep my eyes on the threats in front of me.  Seeing daggers in every shadow usually ends up even worse than not looking at all.  

Anyway, storytelling thread.  We've told ours.  Let's let someone else have a turn.  


Posted By: Gossip Boy
Date Posted: 21 Feb 2014 at 20:15
H? has done nothing wrong.Period.

-------------
Elessar2
[08:34]<Rill> when you've just had part of your brain taken out, you lack a certain amount of credibility
<KillerPoodle> I can say anything I like and it is impossible to prove or disprove


Posted By: Deranzin
Date Posted: 21 Feb 2014 at 23:08
Originally posted by Aurordan Aurordan wrote:

You're not just being sanctimonious, and I'm sure a lot of it really is how you feel, but but you do seem to believe that this whole war revolves around your alliance and that everyone on the other side is either jealous of you or in it for the sake of destruction, somehow. 


Because it is so unreasonable in a game for other people to want to take the number one place from someone that has held it for many years, eh .?. Tongue

I respect your views overall, but this particular point is just not making any sense ...


Posted By: Artefore
Date Posted: 22 Feb 2014 at 23:21
~The Siege of Coriallum as Told by Artefore~ 
Although the battle I recount here is told from my perspective, the real credit for our (semi) victory goes to the entire alliance of T-O and Praetor Augustus especially, as the city was his, and his contributions were instrumental in ensuring the battle's outcome.

The siege was rather late into our foray in the war, and despite this, our western armies had seen relatively little action on the field of battle. We had launched a couple of sieges at NAAM, however none of them had very much success. My own troops hadn't seen a single offensive battle in the west, as they were primarily stalwarts, and their use as city clearers was limited due to the attack avoiding tactics used by NAAM. 

None the less, Praetor Augustus informed us one day in Alliance Chat that a number of vCrow troops were approaching his settlement. Thinking quickly, he demolished most of his city in order to give the besiegers a smaller storming population. This would prove to be a wise decision. As the attackers piled onto the two mountains outside his city, it became clearer and clearer that this was a large and well coordinated military operation on the part of vCrow. As soon as things had settled down, it became evident that direct military force would be insufficient to drive both the vCrow sieges from their mountains. An alternate strategy of defense was devised, in which the city was reinforced with enough troops to defeat the inevitable storm attempt. Furthermore, the siege on the mountain to the west was broken, and Simple Jim settled a city on the square to shield PA's city from other vCrow operations on the defensively favorable terrain. Days went by with neither side budging from their post. PA's city idled at 0 pop, and vCrow, who had scouted the city to asses its defenses, knew better than to attempt a storm. 

The second part of the siege began when vCrow sent a large amount of attacks (over 60) at the city in an attempt to dislodge the defensive force there. Since we didn't have the firepower to maintain the defense in the onslaught of their attacks, a new tactic was devised. We broke all the blockades around the city, and every night an alliance-wide aid effort was conducted, which involved sending millions of basic resources to the city in order to help it rebuild to above storming population. The city hovered around 2k and 5k pop per night, managing to just stay above the mark, and PA slowly rebuilt up his forces in the city and dodged the attacks. In the mean time, we decided to begin picking at the defenses on the mountain. The main force we sent consisted of approximately 80k stalwarts and crossbowmen sent by me. Although I did not receive a battle report for these attacks, I estimate I killed off about the same number of troops that I lost. Any blockades sent at the city were immediately killed off, and the siege continued to fail to drop the city past storming population. 

In the end, the siege lasted the entire 15 days that it had been sent for, and while we didn't kill it off, neither did we lose the city. In the end PA exodused it, due to its location next to two mountains. Thus, it cannot be counted as a forced exo by vCrow as the exo occurred after the siege was over.


-------------
"don't quote me on that" -Artefore


Posted By: Rill
Date Posted: 22 Feb 2014 at 23:24
That was an epic battle on both sides.  Well done T-O and vCrow!


Posted By: Gossip Boy
Date Posted: 22 Feb 2014 at 23:28
Great tale artefore.
Respect.


-------------
Elessar2
[08:34]<Rill> when you've just had part of your brain taken out, you lack a certain amount of credibility
<KillerPoodle> I can say anything I like and it is impossible to prove or disprove


Posted By: BellusRex
Date Posted: 23 Feb 2014 at 01:02
Originally posted by Deranzin Deranzin wrote:



Because it is so unreasonable in a game for other people to want to take the number one place from someone that has held it for many years, eh .?. Tongue

I respect your views overall, but this particular point is just not making any sense ...

"Held" as in past tense. And yes, it's perfectly reasonable to want H? removed from control without seeking that control yourself.


-------------
"War is the father of all things..."


Posted By: HATHALDIR
Date Posted: 23 Feb 2014 at 02:14
For my initial post in this thread (and i reckon i will need to make quite a few), i am going to talk about the start of the Trove war.
The Eagles were invited to join Consone shortly before its existence was announced to Illy. We thought that it was a great idea to be a part of a group of alliances that would solve the great illy mysteries. Very quickly all Consone seemed to be doing was sorting out territorial issues, and pardon me for saying this, our least military minded members, ROADS and Dwarven Druids were the biggest culprits. In our very loosely worded charter ( thoeretical more than concreted) mutual defence was written down.
For about two months before hostilities broke out i was being constantly warned it was not safe to stay in Consone by Executive Chef, a former Eagle. I couldn't come at dropping out of Consone knowing what i did. It instead double my resolve to make it work.
What ended up was a few H? people swapping alliances and clashing with ABSA. Soon VIC was drawn in and i recieved a mail reminding me what we stood for. So mutual defence was important and we declared war on H?
More to follow after copious rebuttal!


-------------
There's worse blokes than me!!


Posted By: Malek
Date Posted: 23 Feb 2014 at 03:47
` Noki` "BANE had previously tried and failed to siege Aemonn's fifth city, but 714 tried again and, this time, succeeded."

Yes this was a failure, though it really was not intended to do much except have troops thrown at it. Which it was successful in that aspect as there was maybe 200 or so attacks on it comprising of a few hundred cav each time with a green commander, with none of those small units killing cats only those larger attacks doing so and excellent K/D ratio for us. 
This was unlike the prior town of Aemonn, no 4 i think, which he exodused away without any inbound armies just reinforcements on the mountain. As he didnt exo again I ordered a siege in as i knew something would happen. 

The successful siege of that town on the second go was comprised mostly of bane troops again. 714 was closer and was able to keep rotating cav through it to raze.

I Exodused a town right in the middle of a group of DB players hoping they would siege me, alas that did not happen. 
----------------------------------
Another intersting action that Dark Blight undertook. Dark Blight counterattacked hyo after he ran his Knight army through a Dark Blight town. Dark Blight put together a siege train on hyo to give him a headache or kill his cav. There was a small gap between the clearing forces and the siege attacking forces where we slipped in the reinforcements to wipe out 588 cat. 

I was also giving Aemon a hard time with small siege trains of about 150 -300 cats or so, as I was on my phone sending them, there was a bit of lag, I got a little carried away and he put his reinforcements in there after the larger siege attack armies went through, lost somewhere between 120-180 cats I think. Great timing aemon, haven't sent another army on my tablet or phone since.  

Once this war is over I hope to tell a couple more. It is good to talk about individual sieges/actions taken for the histories. 


Posted By: Rill
Date Posted: 23 Feb 2014 at 04:09
Well told Malek and hats off to BANE and Dark Blight.


Posted By: Gossip Boy
Date Posted: 23 Feb 2014 at 05:51
Regarding the consone war, I remember how Vic waited for around a week from the declaration on war against absa before coming to their aide so that things can cool down (and everyone knows why that didn't happen). Though I generally don't mind what HM has to say but his constant attacks on jaesche does bother me a little as he was amongst the most honorable people I 've ever interacted with in illy. I don't know how an alliance which wants to usurp power will wait for 7 days before declaring a war when it doesn't necessarily has to?




-------------
Elessar2
[08:34]<Rill> when you've just had part of your brain taken out, you lack a certain amount of credibility
<KillerPoodle> I can say anything I like and it is impossible to prove or disprove


Posted By: KillerPoodle
Date Posted: 23 Feb 2014 at 06:02
Um no - they sent armies immediately and I believe most of the declarations were pretty quick too.

-------------
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM

"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill


Posted By: Gossip Boy
Date Posted: 23 Feb 2014 at 08:59
Do Check the facts, I know you are not in the habit but a person should always change for the better

-------------
Elessar2
[08:34]<Rill> when you've just had part of your brain taken out, you lack a certain amount of credibility
<KillerPoodle> I can say anything I like and it is impossible to prove or disprove


Posted By: Nokigon
Date Posted: 23 Feb 2014 at 10:01
Originally posted by Malek Malek wrote:

` Noki` "BANE had previously tried and failed to siege Aemonn's fifth city, but 714 tried again and, this time, succeeded."

Yes this was a failure, though it really was not intended to do much except have troops thrown at it. Which it was successful in that aspect as there was maybe 200 or so attacks on it comprising of a few hundred cav each time with a green commander, with none of those small units killing cats only those larger attacks doing so and excellent K/D ratio for us. 
This was unlike the prior town of Aemonn, no 4 i think, which he exodused away without any inbound armies just reinforcements on the mountain. As he didnt exo again I ordered a siege in as i knew something would happen. 

The successful siege of that town on the second go was comprised mostly of bane troops again. 714 was closer and was able to keep rotating cav through it to raze.

I Exodused a town right in the middle of a group of DB players hoping they would siege me, alas that did not happen. 
----------------------------------
Another intersting action that Dark Blight undertook. Dark Blight counterattacked hyo after he ran his Knight army through a Dark Blight town. Dark Blight put together a siege train on hyo to give him a headache or kill his cav. There was a small gap between the clearing forces and the siege attacking forces where we slipped in the reinforcements to wipe out 588 cat. 

I was also giving Aemon a hard time with small siege trains of about 150 -300 cats or so, as I was on my phone sending them, there was a bit of lag, I got a little carried away and he put his reinforcements in there after the larger siege attack armies went through, lost somewhere between 120-180 cats I think. Great timing aemon, haven't sent another army on my tablet or phone since.  

Once this war is over I hope to tell a couple more. It is good to talk about individual sieges/actions taken for the histories. 
I dunno, I would say that the siege of 05 couldn't have been handled more effectively by us. The small attacks meant that we got a nearly 2:1 kill ratio- 40k troops to kill 70k. You may disagree with these figures, my records are haphazard.

05 and 04 were both supposed to be exodused as they were next to mountains and had troops on said mountain. The only reason 05 wasn't exodused was because of a 30d research queue (I know.). So you were kinda lucky then.

Your town that you exodused was a great example of why we need counterclaiming back. Without counterclaiming we were more or less powerless to stop you. However, since I was pretty sure you wanted us to put a siege there because of the building (we already knew about your stals) I didn't bother sieging. We just hit it with some troops and blockaded it.

The Hyo op taught us to be a lot more careful with our RT. The operation put our RT capabilities back by an annoyingly large amount. Luckily we were able to return the favour when we took out your 120cats and 4k stals.


Posted By: Deranzin
Date Posted: 23 Feb 2014 at 13:04
Originally posted by BellusRex BellusRex wrote:

 

"Held" as in past tense.


Yes ... if we want to be totally correct I should have written "had been holding"

Originally posted by BellusRex BellusRex wrote:


And yes, it's perfectly reasonable to want H? removed from control without seeking that control yourself.

 
Please do explain me that reasoning if you have some time ... Smile

Because as far as I know there has never been an example of a power struggle "just for the fun of it" ... someone eventually WILL have to fill in the shoes of the people that vacated them ... and more often than not, the more obscure and dubious the line of "succession" is, the more trouble that spells towards stability (numerous historical examples of that) as a whole.


-------------



Just like a "before and after" ad ! ahahahaah :p


Posted By: Malek
Date Posted: 23 Feb 2014 at 13:15
Originally posted by Nokigon Nokigon wrote:

Originally posted by Malek Malek wrote:

` Noki` "BANE had previously tried and failed to siege Aemonn's fifth city, but 714 tried again and, this time, succeeded."

Yes this was a failure, though it really was not intended to do much except have troops thrown at it. Which it was successful in that aspect as there was maybe 200 or so attacks on it comprising of a few hundred cav each time with a green commander, with none of those small units killing cats only those larger attacks doing so and excellent K/D ratio for us. 
This was unlike the prior town of Aemonn, no 4 i think, which he exodused away without any inbound armies just reinforcements on the mountain. As he didnt exo again I ordered a siege in as i knew something would happen. 

The successful siege of that town on the second go was comprised mostly of bane troops again. 714 was closer and was able to keep rotating cav through it to raze.

I Exodused a town right in the middle of a group of DB players hoping they would siege me, alas that did not happen. 
----------------------------------
Another intersting action that Dark Blight undertook. Dark Blight counterattacked hyo after he ran his Knight army through a Dark Blight town. Dark Blight put together a siege train on hyo to give him a headache or kill his cav. There was a small gap between the clearing forces and the siege attacking forces where we slipped in the reinforcements to wipe out 588 cat. 

I was also giving Aemon a hard time with small siege trains of about 150 -300 cats or so, as I was on my phone sending them, there was a bit of lag, I got a little carried away and he put his reinforcements in there after the larger siege attack armies went through, lost somewhere between 120-180 cats I think. Great timing aemon, haven't sent another army on my tablet or phone since.  

Once this war is over I hope to tell a couple more. It is good to talk about individual sieges/actions taken for the histories. 
I dunno, I would say that the siege of 05 couldn't have been handled more effectively by us. The small attacks meant that we got a nearly 2:1 kill ratio- 40k troops to kill 70k. You may disagree with these figures, my records are haphazard.

05 and 04 were both supposed to be exodused as they were next to mountains and had troops on said mountain. The only reason 05 wasn't exodused was because of a 30d research queue (I know.). So you were kinda lucky then.

Your town that you exodused was a great example of why we need counterclaiming back. Without counterclaiming we were more or less powerless to stop you. However, since I was pretty sure you wanted us to put a siege there because of the building (we already knew about your stals) I didn't bother sieging. We just hit it with some troops and blockaded it.

The Hyo op taught us to be a lot more careful with our RT. The operation put our RT capabilities back by an annoyingly large amount. Luckily we were able to return the favour when we took out your 120cats and 4k stals.

30 Day Research, ouch no need for sabo attacks on that one. 
 
As to counterclaiming, I could not agree more. I have seen numerous instances since the pause of it where counterclaiming could have made a difference. This being one, The NC town exoing into the middle of NAAM towns another. I think Amporphias did it as well in the MM area, not quite sure on that one. 



Posted By: KillerPoodle
Date Posted: 23 Feb 2014 at 15:50
Originally posted by Gossip Boy Gossip Boy wrote:

Do Check the facts, I know you are not in the habit but a person should always change for the better


Troll.

Vic issued a recall of tourney troops on the 7th Oct and had troops in motion towards the siege on the 9th/10th Oct.  Much less than a week after hostilities started. Maybe you should take your own advice.


-------------
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM

"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill


Posted By: Shadar Logoth
Date Posted: 23 Feb 2014 at 19:55
KP ... there have been many inconsistencies in your claims over time. (Btw I remember HM mentioning how consistent H? was... )

I am to tired to keep summing them up. But here we go again for at least 2 of them. 

First... Breaking sieges was never considered an offensive action by H?(and by it's "allies", would use other words but trying to keep calm and not resort to offensive words) .... 
.... off course, when it suited you best and you could do the breaking in the past. 

When Invictus send in troops to break sieges, (read point one, NOT offensive) H? warned VIC that it was considered an offensive action... how weird?

Second...

Jasche, the one you keep trying to pull down, but the one who has also always been the most CONSISTENT player to be called true to his word, actually called back all attacks against those sieges, even when most of invictus players hated doing so. See... we do stand by our friends. (Something you and yours so loudly applauded when it benefited you. But suddenly it was something considered evil and offensive. ) How bold you and yours were saying that confeds not standing by their friends were not worth their money... 

Consone did that, stood by it's confeds and they broke sieges, they DID NOT initiate sieges. 
Cry foul play all you want... Inconsistency two! 

Even when Jasche ordered it, and we didn't like his orders, all attacks were kept back after that. And you, being so militairy oriented knew that attacks launched could not be called back. 

All you had to say to that was "well... they could have been send in after the call went out".

I have to admit.... Jasche called your bluff, and you miserably failed at meeting it.... If I had still been leader of Invictus you would indeed have managed to goad me into the war you wanted all along. Not with Jasche... 
But you wanted that war, ... it was evident from the beginning. And if Consone/Jasche was willing to go this far... what then??? ... If you had accepted what he had offered then you would have never been able to pull off your precious war again. So you had to go forward even though the foundations of it were failing beneath your feet as it happened. 

Gratz, you won.... for a while (hmmmm this sounds familiar?)  

Sorry... two points where you lost my respect. And two points where I had my eyes on the whole situation. 

I don't mind people who actually roleplay. If they ARE really roleplaying and not just hiding behind it to insult people. 
I also don't mind people who are honest enough to say "I am just in it for the war". 
What I do mind is alliances such as H? claiming time and time again that they are not the aggressors. 
If you want to play that card try to give it at least a LOT more effort or don't come up with cheap tricks/lies like this. 

Truelly.... these were only 2 of the things that really made me lose my respect for H? .... 

Not even going to go into all the other times. 

(edited for spelling errors, was to angry when i posted this, and still am)






-------------
More Orc, less talking!

All that is said is my own opinion. I am not a leader nor voice for Invictus. I will always abide by Invictus's rules.


Posted By: Angrim
Date Posted: 23 Feb 2014 at 20:31
it would be a shame to see this thread derailed because players cannot keep to the topic. there are about a hundred other forum topics in which the warring sides can accuse one another of misdeeds, misrepresentations and half-truths.


Posted By: KillerPoodle
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2014 at 14:21
Not sure why gossip and shadar are so set on dredging up the past but whatever.

Originally posted by Shadar Logoth Shadar Logoth wrote:

 
First... Breaking sieges was never considered an offensive action by H?


I don't think so.  Firstly because I do not recall ever saying anything of the sort (but I don't claim perfect recall so feel free to refresh my memory with some proof).

Second, from the very beginning H? is one of the few alliances who truly understood that the moment you put your diplos and troops out there you are opening yourself up to a response regardless of how "right" you think you are.

It doesn't mean you have to agree with the response, but it's always a possibility. This is something Consone and Jasche never "got".

Quote
Jasche, the one you keep trying to pull down, but the one who has also always been the most CONSISTENT player to be called true to his word, actually called back all attacks against those sieges, even when most of invictus players hated doing so.

I have to admit.... Jasche called your bluff, and you miserably failed at meeting it.... If I had still been leader of Invictus you would indeed have managed to goad me into the war you wanted all along.


And nope again.  Jasche himself sent out an IGM on Oct 11th to VIC stating that any members were free to send troops to get involved in the RHY/ABSA war.

He did this without any attempt to discuss diplomacy with RHY (FYI that makes him a worse diplomat than Sir Brad - who did send a message before sending troops).

The only reason he later tried to recall that order was when he realised the size of what he'd stepped in. Had it been a smaller and less able alliance than H? he would have continued with his casual/thoughtless escalation and Consone would have rumbled onward. 

The fact that that kind of brainless escalation was hard coded into Consone's constitution enabled instant bullying of smaller alliances who tried to stand up to them, and is one of the reasons Consone was a ill executed idea from the start.

FYI - I allowed Jasche to call my bluff in public because I did not want him to know how good our intel was, but the fact is, we knew he was the one who pulled the trigger to send VIC troops into battle and that his only reason to recant was because he was scared of H? rather than some higher peaceful ambition.



-------------
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM

"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill


Posted By: Daefis
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2014 at 14:44
KP you're being selective in your memories again I'm afraid. Jasche's mail was very clear that the only action was to clear sieges nothing more and you know this. Unfortunately it had become apparent even at this point that it was a set up by H? to instigate a war as HM has now been good to confirm to everyone in another thread.
Jasche made attempts at diplomacy with H? and was consistently rebuffed, patronised or simply ignored for his efforts. H? engineered the situation and Jasche had no way of dufusing a situation that was already scripted and in progress. 


-------------
http://elgea.illyriad.co.uk/a/p/37796" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: KillerPoodle
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2014 at 15:51
You're still missing both points.

Sending troops to get a new alliance involved in a war is an escalation, regardless of what those troops are going to do.

Had it been a smaller and less scary alliance there would have been no attempts at diplomacy. Jasche's attempts were too little, too late and for the wrong reasons.


-------------
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM

"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill


Posted By: Daefis
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2014 at 16:19
Originally posted by KillerPoodle KillerPoodle wrote:

You're still missing both points.

Sending troops to get a new alliance involved in a war is an escalation, regardless of what those troops are going to do.

Had it been a smaller and less scary alliance there would have been no attempts at diplomacy. Jasche's attempts were too little, too late and for the wrong reasons.

And futile since you had already geared up for war and were going to have it regardless.
Anyway this is rehashing old news but belittling Jasche over a year after he was driven out of the game isn't very becoming.



-------------
http://elgea.illyriad.co.uk/a/p/37796" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: Gossip Boy
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2014 at 17:34
Originally posted by KillerPoodle KillerPoodle wrote:

Not sure why gossip and shadar are so set on dredging up the past but whatever.




Because maybe your leader started slandering jasche in another thread.

Just another example of your hypocrisy.


-------------
Elessar2
[08:34]<Rill> when you've just had part of your brain taken out, you lack a certain amount of credibility
<KillerPoodle> I can say anything I like and it is impossible to prove or disprove


Posted By: Hora
Date Posted: 25 Feb 2014 at 00:09
About derailing the thread...

It was me and HM to bring up the topic of Consone war - non derail at all, as the Consone war is a important part within this history lesson.

We both stated multiple times, that each thread was a BIASED version of the same story, and we were both trying to add to the understanding of each other without the vicious pre- and postwar propaganda rhethorics.

Would like to have seen a thread with many posts like this, but certain persons dragged it back to finding culprits and insulting people, trying to invent other peoples motivations out of some (again BIASED) intell they might have got.

I made my point in here, so did HM. Many nice people also defended the names insulted, and I think they made their point, too (Many thanks for that!).

So my advice is to ignore any further accusations in here, as I hope they tend to fall back to the wielder.

This said, I'll retreat myself from this topic - actually to follow HM's example.

kindest regards.


Posted By: Nokigon
Date Posted: 25 Feb 2014 at 19:35
http://cdn9.illyriad.com/filter?url=http://www.illyriad.co.uk/Content/player/uk1/Illyriad_x379_y91_z5_2014-01-18T13-49-139e26d510-3b2a-4af0-aad3-032748435e67.jpg

I used to have more but I cleared everything on my laptop recently and this is the only screenshot I still have. This is a nice representation of an average DB siege.


Posted By: Deranzin
Date Posted: 28 Feb 2014 at 09:40
Well now that I have an interesting tale to share, I might as well record it ... let us name it :

One+ alliance vs one player

Anyone looking at the war map will notice how good and obvious target I am atm ... anticipating such an eventuality I had all my cities surrounded by plains, but against overwhelming odds that doesn't really mean anything in the end, other than some good k/d ratios ... so it was not long since an operation was organized by the the nearby powerhouse of VICX to attack two of my cities at the same time.

Of course, before that, they thoroughly scouted my cities and after analyzing the data they decided to attack the cities of 3. Xarvanthor and 8. Lar Toribar, which contained 24K pikemen and almost 8K knights respectively, with THREE sieges for each city.

Their general plan was like that as it unfolded :

  • Send occupying forces to the spots to work as lightning rods (which is a good tactic even if those forces are attacked or not)
  • Then land the sieges with 2 of them having modest defenses and 1 of them have over a million troops to defend itm to be on the safe side
  • Then flood the place with direct attacks to kill the armies within along with blockades
  • Wait for the population to drop and raze the city
And here the tale splits because the two cities had a different fate, because of a slight mistake in step two ... out of miscalculation or confidence, I know not, but out of the 6 sieges that landed around my cities, only two had troops other than siege weapons within them ... which meant that unless their direct hits struck, then they couldn't storm the city.

So let us take the faster tale first : Lar Toribar

The sieges contained a lot of siege weapons and were well protected and myzel's siege contained 42K pikemen within it so the situation was dire indeed ... I prestige builded the city a bit to move the raze moment to a more convenient time for my RL schedule and then left the town to de-level while only killing blockades.

In this case I miscalculated and wasted my knights on the totally wrong siege, so the city was empty of troops as well, not that knights were any good in defending, but anyway ... so, I thought of something else ... since I was the one actually timing the moment the city would hit the raze population, I sent some pikemen on my own inside the city in the hope that they would hit the raze button immediately. So, in went 50K pikemen, awaiting Myzel's hit ... but it never came ... they saw the armies coming and wisely kept their hands away from the "storm and raze" button

So after two hours, in lew of another incoming attack, I withdrew my pikemen to be used for later battles and proclaimed the city lost.

But that didn't happen as soon as I thought either ... because VICX saw my armies go in, but they didn't seem to notice them going out or they didn't believe that all of them where out ... so when that incoming turned out to be a blockade they were left with a town with unknown defenders and since I had killed my knights early on, they had been sending only blockades Big smile ... so they had to wait for many hours (around 10) for Myzel to send another attack to confirm that the city was indeed empty and then hit the raze button.

And thus Lar Toribar fell, but not without quite some fun involved as you just read.

Now the other, longer, tale for the "happy end" : Xarvanthor

  • One siege there had 1 million+ defenders, but only siege weapons in its composition
  • The other siege also had no troops in it and it had around 40000 defenders
  • The last siege HAD troops in it and it had around 65000 defenders
I could have taken siege 2 first, but that would be pointless because I was fast coming to the decision that with my meager prestige points left, three sieges would need a better plan to be faced ... so I killed the THIRD siege instead Wink

The reason for this was my belief that I could dodge with my armies at any time of the day (I am usually around the computer) and at night I could get a sitter to help me with that task and the existence of an army inside the city would deter them for a longer time if they were bereft of the siege that had troops, than losing the siege without troops ...

So, down siege three went, to a significant cost of my forces, but it was worth it ... because now they were left with two sieges that couldn't storm the city Big smile so we entered the dodge-dance while I kept most blockades down (more for fun, than to ship resources since I wasn't building anything anymore at that moment) and the city went to zero population and stayed there for many many many hours ... and the sieges were ticking away, because thinking of the whole matter as a normal 3 siege procedure they correctly assumed that 2-3 days would be more than enough to flatten the city ... and the city was flat indeed ... flatter than a pancake pressed by a bulldozer ... but it still had 24000 pikemen in it Tongue

Somewhere in these hours of zero population, Geofrey (who was owner of the 1 million + protected siege) must have thought that he could make the raze call between my dodges (or so I think. I do not really believe that he accidentally hit the button, though that can happen as well) so he tried this out in the premise of "we have another active siege anyway and the town is zero pop as well, so any more bombardment is useless" ... and WHAM he landed on my spearmen and siege one was down 

Unbeknownst to me my neighbor Keaves[BANE] after sending a couple of hits and blockades, was sending a siege of his own, a fourth siege (which now resides in my signature) containing this time ONLY troops (15000 knights in particular) and also provided occupying forces on another square along with Rathgore[vCrow] (another neighbor)  ...

So, what I thought was a direct hit, I was amazed (and, sorry VICX, also hugely amuzed ) to find it was another siege ... they had asked literally for the cavalry to arrive and with their siege have 1d and half left, they had asked for other allies to chip in and make things even more harder for me ...

Well I was flattered, but my city was also flattened at the same time Tongue ...

I considered destroying Keave's siege before too many occupationaly forces reinforced it, but it would be futile as I knew that he had another cavalry city nearby ... 
I thought that I could keep dodging till the time Keave's siege activates and hope he'd be offline (he had timed it only for 15h, so he had only 3h to hit raze) or that somehow I could reinforce the city right at that moment with the forces I saved from Lar Toribar ... now THAT would have worked, but it would need THE timing and uber careful planning ... but it was a surefire victory if I could pull it off ...

So I set to planning that arduous task and then it hit me ! Big smile ... or actually something ELSE hit the last siege ... it was a messenger recalling one of their armies within ... I scouted the square and it turned out that the most massive force defending it had just GONE and now I could take it out even with my leftover forces !

So, why hit Keaves and his rising occupation force .?. It was no longer relevant in my plans ... now I could take out siege 2 which I had left alone and so noone else though of reinforcing further and then drop as many blockades as possible and sneak in one caravan ... so, with the catapults gone, if I build up to ANY amount of population Keaves and his forces would be unable to storm my hut Wink (it was no longer a city  LOL )

I scrambled to send scouts to the blockades, do the calculations and lo and behold reserving troops instead of just whacking them on their massive forces paid off ... I had the forces needed ! In fact I could have taken it down even without that recall, but it would have been a close shot and I might not have thought of it had I not seen that messenger going in and making my life easier.

  • Out went my knights
  • In went the caravan
  • Down went the last siege
  • Up went Xarvanthor's population

VICTORY !!! Big smile Big smile

and the One+ Alliance Vs one player tale, ended with the score 1-1 ... for now ... I expect this to be my last victory of that kind (I most certainly not have the troops for another feat like that, nor will they make the same overconfident mistakes that made everything actually possible), but that is indeed a good way to go down ... by having fun at it LOL

So, last but not least, as I said in GC yesterday, a big thank you to VICX el al for providing the excitement and the thrill of making me do all those close calls and quick decisions and a big thank you to my alliance who help me implement my plans by keeping my troops alive while I slept. Big smile


-------------



Just like a "before and after" ad ! ahahahaah :p


Posted By: Mr Damage
Date Posted: 28 Feb 2014 at 11:32
Fantastic reading Deranzin, well done.


Posted By: Cilcain
Date Posted: 28 Feb 2014 at 14:26
Well written Deranzin - in the spirit of the OP.  And well played.

Although your 'victory' at Xarva was a little Pyrrhic to say the least.

Originally posted by Deranzin Deranzin wrote:

... I expect this to be my last victory of that kind

I certainly hope so!

Originally posted by Deranzin Deranzin wrote:

 
 but that is indeed a good way to go down ... by having fun at it LOL

Hear hear!!


-------------
http://elgea.illyriad.co.uk/a/p/77750" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: Deranzin
Date Posted: 28 Feb 2014 at 14:46
Originally posted by Cilcain Cilcain wrote:

Well written Deranzin - in the spirit of the OP.  And well played.

Although your 'victory' at Xarva was a little Pyrrhic to say the least.


Considering the odds I do not think that there was ever even an option for any other kind of victory Tongue at least the city was so thoroughly destroyed that there weren't any rooftops left, so I was safe LOL (sorry bad historical joke, but I couldn't resist)
 
Btw, I forgot to write that I'd be glad to hear the other side of the story as well. Smile




-------------



Just like a "before and after" ad ! ahahahaah :p


Posted By: Mr Damage
Date Posted: 28 Feb 2014 at 21:56
Originally posted by Deranzin Deranzin wrote:

Originally posted by Cilcain Cilcain wrote:

Well written Deranzin - in the spirit of the OP.  And well played.

Although your 'victory' at Xarva was a little Pyrrhic to say the least.


Considering the odds I do not think that there was ever even an option for any other kind of victory Tongue at least the city was so thoroughly destroyed that there weren't any rooftops left, so I was safe LOL (sorry bad historical joke, but I couldn't resist)
 
Btw, I forgot to write that I'd be glad to hear the other side of the story as well. Smile



Yeah me too, lets hear it guys.


Posted By: Jenin
Date Posted: 01 Mar 2014 at 20:42
I mostly enjoyed this thread, especially the parts about their calculation of risks and timings they undertook and the excitement as their battles unfolded!

The parts I did not appreciate so much were largely conjecture about the motivations of other players, back handed compliments and slanders.    

FACTS and REQUESTS for facts are what win the day in any social context.  Everything else smacks of passive and or outright aggression, which just plain is NOT necessary.

I found Honored Mule's conjecture as to other folks motivations and cases for actions particularly offensive.  I really think that  if SERIOUS communication were to take place, that QUESTIONS be asked and that FACTS reviewed and even if debated and parsed between the opposing parties, (rather than seeing bitter conjecture posted), we might have room for all of us to feel happy in this game.  Please HM, take that to private communications with the actual parties that you feel committed offenses and ASK them why they did things, instead of posting it in the format of a political diatribe comprised of uninformed editorializing.

And did I say how much I enjoyed the posts about the educated guesses, gambles and the fellings of hope and loss these warriors took?  Smile



Posted By: Myzel
Date Posted: 01 Mar 2014 at 21:29
Originally posted by Deranzin Deranzin wrote:

Originally posted by Cilcain Cilcain wrote:

Well written Deranzin - in the spirit of the OP.  And well played.

Although your 'victory' at Xarva was a little Pyrrhic to say the least.


Considering the odds I do not think that there was ever even an option for any other kind of victory Tongue at least the city was so thoroughly destroyed that there weren't any rooftops left, so I was safe LOL (sorry bad historical joke, but I couldn't resist)
 
Btw, I forgot to write that I'd be glad to hear the other side of the story as well. Smile



I think I came off pretty well in your story. Fact is I was not home when raze time came. When I returned my alliance leaders were unsure if there were any troops in Lar Toribar, so I sent my knights to take a look. They confirmed that there was in fact no army hiding in the basement of the one hut left standing, so my army went ahead and razed it.


Posted By: Starry
Date Posted: 06 Mar 2014 at 01:47
Just little tale about the war to keep it lighthearted.....

How Starry's Lake Resort became Starry's Lakeside Dude Ranch

One day I woke up to find the Concierge knocking on my door telling me that I had quite a few visitors next to my town of Nova. While I was flattered by the attention, when I saw 85 incoming armies to my city, I realized they weren't here to take advantage of the legendary hospitality of my Lake Resort...

Very soon, I had blockades landing. I dodged most of the attacks and the Call To Arms went up to defend my quiet little resort town. I killed the blockades and soon we had quite a few sunburnt resort enthusiasts mustered behind our walls, repelling wave after wave of cavalry from our Dark and VCrow neighbors. We also had a siege set up against us from a large hill next to us where we used to hold our sunrise yoga classes. Instead of Downward Dog, they were flinging down boulders on Club Starry! The Social Director, HM, had to be torn away from leading the Bingothon and tried to tell them that the Volleyball tournament wasn't scheduled until later that afternoon, but no one seemed to listen! (perhaps they were already taking advantage of our legendary open bar policy).

Regardless, a large number of attacks started rolling in each with 30 building engines each. Obviously, if they'd read the notice on the Activities Board, we weren't scheduled to have our waterballoon fight until after jetskiing at 3pm. Regardless, they managed to mostly expire at our walls and the darnedest thing happened. They kept leaving their Draught Horses in the town! And we didn't have a stables! We're a lake resort after all and very focused on water sports!

Needless to say this kept continuuing. And, at some point, the crowd on the Yoga Hill kept diminishing and ultimately, they expired. If they'd only gone to more of our cross fit classes! But the darnedest thing happened... They kept sending their waterballoon siege armies at us! So, despite some pretty excellent horse riding demos they did for us outside the city (Ditto's were almost as good as Lipizzaners, but need a bit of training on how to jump over walls), the waterballoon folks kept leaving more and more horses! After it was all done, the quite exhuberant water balloon folks left over 1,730 siege engines in firewood outside our little resort and left over 1,000 Draught Horses!

What to do with all these burly horses? So... being good Hospitality professionals, we have reinvented ourselves! We are now Starry's Lakeside Dude Ranch! We offer trail rides, log pulling demonstrations, swimming with stallions, etc. Also, we're set for firewood and will be having nightly campfires with S'more Roasting just after sunset cocktails at 7pm!

So thank you all for your visit, unconventional as it may have been, and please don't forget to give us good reviews on TripAdvisor!

Starry


-------------
CEO, Harmless?
Founder of Toothless?

"Truth never dies."
-HonoredMule



Posted By: Neytiri
Date Posted: 06 Mar 2014 at 04:59
This is a great thread.  Now all it needs is Cliff's Notes.

-------------
"It is well that their bodies know the heat and the cold; it will make them strong warriors and mothers." - Absaroke elder (from Edward S. Curtis's book 'The North American Indian')


Posted By: KillerPoodle
Date Posted: 06 Mar 2014 at 05:06
I think Cliff quit the game.

-------------
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM

"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill


Posted By: BellusRex
Date Posted: 06 Mar 2014 at 18:48
Nice post, Starry...

-------------
"War is the father of all things..."


Posted By: darpansah
Date Posted: 06 Mar 2014 at 21:03
I had 138 attacks on my city and I thought they were less....lol


Posted By: Deranzin
Date Posted: 07 Mar 2014 at 08:43
Another smaller story this time with a slight different name :

Two alliances vs 1 player

Having already a siege from vCrow and VICX pounding on the buildings of one city (everything landed at night and didn't really watch that), I noticed that another siege in a different town was going to land in my first town from Dittobite, the head vCrow so I thought I might look things up this time ...

A couple of early occupation forces, I decided to take out, unlike other times, since the siege was coming near, but the timing didn't seem to be any good ... I do not know why they did that since they did have scout reports from my towns and they should have known that I still had some troops left, mostly pikemen though.

Before the siege, finally two large occupations hit the same spot, so more or less I knew the point of the siege, but I waited in case by some weird mistake it landed on another point ... it didn't.

Out went the scouts.
In came the reports
out I sent the pikemen BEFORE the knights, because it turned out that all the units gathered there didn't have a lot of spear defense ...

So, I time my attacks like this : Pikemen - knights - knights - pikemen for the final clear.

At that point I was a bit late in sending all of these because I was reading scout reports and checking the other siege as well ... so, 20 minutes after finally sending everything I perceived an incoming on the map going at 2-3 arrows !

I counted the map tiles again and again as time went by ... my knights were faster, my pikemen where slower than that so the last and conclusive attack was going to hit at the same time as the incoming. I HAD to watch that show, despite the very late time Smile

First and second hit came and went confirming that for a small margin I would definitely need the 4th attack ... 3rd attack lands and only 1 catapult is left in the siege ! SO CLOSE and both of the other forces are over the spot ...

I counted the last 20 seconds one by one ... and my pikemen hit first ( I think around 10 seconds earlier than the reinforcements ! Thumbs Up)

Down went Dittobite's siege
Up went the occupation force
Out went my city which I moved a bit east to avoid their follow-up siege, but mostly for fun, because they will eventually re-send a siege even there Tongue

TOWN SAVED !!! ... for now ... and the score to the 2 alliances vs 1 player tale, went to 2-2 Big smile ... also for now, since they are sieging two towns of mine atm and even though I still have some troops left, I think that the amount of stunts I can pull off, just ended ... but I think that I had the maximum fun out of both my cities and my troops, anyway Smile


-------------



Just like a "before and after" ad ! ahahahaah :p


Posted By: Halcyon
Date Posted: 07 Mar 2014 at 12:32
Originally posted by Starry Starry wrote:

So thank you all for your visit, unconventional as it may have been, and please don't forget to give us good reviews on TripAdvisor!

I can't honestly recommend this hotel.
Starry's welcome leaves a lot to be desired.
Ouch


Posted By: Rill
Date Posted: 07 Mar 2014 at 15:38
Congrats on another defense Deranzin.  Amusing stories by both you and Starry adding colour to this thread.


Posted By: jcx
Date Posted: 12 Mar 2014 at 09:52
As a newbie warrior playing in the actual war gives me Adrenaline Rush plus a good night sleep.

Seeing tons of incoming from all directions was absolute Fun and Excitement.

I joined H? to test what I've learned in my 11 months stay in Elgea.. being in the battle field attacking, dodging, thieving, etc. is a test of endurance while keeping your troops alive, unloading them, saving a better city and live to fight another day.

So keep you Swords sharp and lace up - this is a game, so lets have fun. LOL


-------------
Disclaimer: The above is jcx|orcboy's personal opinion and is not the opinion or policy of Harmless? [H?] or of the little green men that have been following him all day.

jcx in H? | orcboy in H?


Posted By: Kumomoto
Date Posted: 22 May 2014 at 04:57
In keeping with the story telling, one of our members has one he wanted me to share with you all...

As many of you know, our neighborhood down around the Great Lake in Tallimar that many of us call home has had a few new neighbors... Several of the folks who are at war with us have settled there, including a few that have new ones that we can only surmise were created for the war (who names their alliance "cash"???)...

Well... in the name of neighborhood friendliness, I sent a few folks to welcome one of our new neighbors... I guess they sort of crowded the city, because they were obviously mistakenly run down by a group of folks racing horses by some guy who, rather daringly, named himself "Danger Russ". He must be referring to his traffic habits!

Regardless, our member decided to go visit this fast driver to say hi and saw that he had, besides quite a few fast driving cavalry, 452 welcome torches for us shaped like Catapults and Ballistas. Needless to say, we were completely grateful for the amazing display they made when they burned! We have never, in my experience, seen that many siege engine shaped torches go up in one visit in the history of Illy!



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net