Eagles Eyrie surrenders to Harmless?
Printed From: Illyriad
Category: The World
Forum Name: Politics & Diplomacy
Forum Description: If you run an alliance on Elgea, here's where you should make your intentions public.
URL: http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=4935
Printed Date: 17 Apr 2022 at 04:19 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Eagles Eyrie surrenders to Harmless?
Posted By: HATHALDIR
Subject: Eagles Eyrie surrenders to Harmless?
Date Posted: 03 Apr 2013 at 10:25
After much time at war, EE has surrender to the Coalition and accepted their demands for reparations. Eagles salute valiant foes and the mutual education imparted on both sides. Lets try this peace thing now. HATHALDIR, for EAGLES EYRIE
kudos for Turgor and KillerPoodle for hammering it out
------------- There's worse blokes than me!!
|
Replies:
Posted By: Caconafyx
Date Posted: 03 Apr 2013 at 10:30
|
never look to an Aussie for eloquence.
I'd like to also applaud the coalition forces for their honour and integrity, and join Hath and hopefully many others in working towards bringing peace to Illyriad for as long as is possible
|
Posted By: Malek
Date Posted: 03 Apr 2013 at 11:12
|
A spade is a spade caconafyx.
|
Posted By: Ossian
Date Posted: 03 Apr 2013 at 11:30
Good Fight Eagles. I reckon you can all hold your heads high
|
Posted By: Rill
Date Posted: 03 Apr 2013 at 13:58
|
Glad to hear it, Hath. May the Eagles soar high.
|
Posted By: scaramouche
Date Posted: 03 Apr 2013 at 18:41
glad to hear this news...was a pleasure fighting along side you guys.
------------- NO..I dont do the Fandango!
|
Posted By: AZADICAN
Date Posted: 03 Apr 2013 at 19:46
Well done EE, nice fight.
-------------
|
Posted By: Tordenkaffen
Date Posted: 03 Apr 2013 at 19:48
?
Edit. Peace, alright then. Good game!
------------- "FYI - if you had any balls you'd be posting under your in-game name." - KP
|
Posted By: The_Dude
Date Posted: 03 Apr 2013 at 19:54
Congrats on ending the war. 
This should conclude The Great Consone War, iirc.
|
Posted By: Starry
Date Posted: 03 Apr 2013 at 20:10
Well done Turgor and KP! Good to be at peace again!
------------- CEO, Harmless? Founder of Toothless?
"Truth never dies." -HonoredMule
|
Posted By: Rorgash
Date Posted: 03 Apr 2013 at 21:05
meh, i have reports showing Hath as less then 400 troops total in all his towns :P im sure they could have hammered it some more.
-------------
|
Posted By: tansiraine
Date Posted: 04 Apr 2013 at 04:45
yay Peace!! all around!!!
|
Posted By: Ashtar
Date Posted: 04 Apr 2013 at 07:31
TCOL salutes the fine effort put forth by both sides to find a resolution to the conflict.
------------- Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. - Buddha
|
Posted By: saint4
Date Posted: 04 Apr 2013 at 07:52
|
It was fun to be a witness to this war. I not only learned several new tactics, but also learned a lot about the alliances and the people behind the players. It was a real pleasure being on the outside looking in. I would like to thank both sides for the knowledge that I have gained from it. Good Fight Eagles... I have said it before, and I will say it again, I never met a nicer alliance all around than EE. Thanks again and congratulations to both sides.
|
Posted By: Thes Hunter
Date Posted: 04 Apr 2013 at 15:38
|
It was an honor fighting along side my comrades, and an honor joining those of the coalition on the fields of battle.
There was many a great intellect I enjoyed sparing with over the last 6 months, and my hats off to you.
------------- The image in my avatar is a chalk pastel drawing I did as part of the Imagine Yellowstone Art competition.
|
Posted By: Canesrule
Date Posted: 05 Apr 2013 at 13:03
|
Well done to all parties. Good to see The Great Trove War is over.
|
Posted By: belargyle
Date Posted: 05 Apr 2013 at 19:19
|
It should or could be more accurately called "The Great Winter War"
Or "The Great 'C' War" (Consone/Coalition)
|
Posted By: The_Dude
Date Posted: 05 Apr 2013 at 19:25
Canesrule wrote:
Well done to all parties. Good to see The Great Trove War is over. |
Canes, were fighting for a Trove mine?
I was not.
|
Posted By: scaramouche
Date Posted: 05 Apr 2013 at 22:32
The_Dude wrote:
Canesrule wrote:
Well done to all parties. Good to see The Great Trove War is over. |
Canes, were fighting for a Trove mine?
I was not. |
I don't recall RES even in THE war?
------------- NO..I dont do the Fandango!
|
Posted By: The_Dude
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 01:02
scaramouche wrote:
The_Dude wrote:
Canesrule wrote:
Well done to all parties. Good to see The Great Trove War is over. |
Canes, were fighting for a Trove mine?
I was not. |
I don't recall RES even in THE war? | I've heard Traumatic Brain Injury can cause memory loss.
|
Posted By: scaramouche
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 10:41
The_Dude wrote:
scaramouche wrote:
The_Dude wrote:
Canesrule wrote:
Well done to all parties. Good to see The Great Trove War is over. |
Canes, were fighting for a Trove mine?
I was not. |
I don't recall RES even in THE war? | I've heard Traumatic Brain Injury can cause memory loss. |
dementia..is the word, im sure...although im not quite at that stage...yet. seriously though...RES wasn't...you was at war with WE only. If I'm wrong, feel free to correct me as I didn't always keep an eye on your diplomatic stance throughout the war.
------------- NO..I dont do the Fandango!
|
Posted By: Angrim
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 15:09
|
i'm not sure why "The Great Trove War" causes so much consternation. it may have been suggested to trivialise the conflict, but in current usage it no more implies that the conflict was about a trove mine than "The Battle of the Pelennor Fields" implies that the War of the Rings was about a nice piece of farmland outside the gates of Minas Tirith.
|
Posted By: Tordenkaffen
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 15:27
Call it what you want. Not many other wars going on in Illy frankly, so for the foreseeable future referring to it simply as "the war", should aptly convey your meaning.
Cheers.
------------- "FYI - if you had any balls you'd be posting under your in-game name." - KP
|
Posted By: The_Dude
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 15:42
scaramouche wrote:
***
dementia..is the word, im sure...although im not quite at that stage...yet. seriously though...RES wasn't...you was at war with WE only. If I'm wrong, feel free to correct me as I didn't always keep an eye on your diplomatic stance throughout the war. |
While RES declared formal war on WE only, once Consone alliances engaged RES armies in defense of WE, RES, reciprocated. This is why you encountered so many RES armies reinforcing tigre's warg pit, and there were RES armies assisting in breaking sieges at H? cities, and other sundry actions versus non-WE Consone.
|
Posted By: Kumomoto
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 16:13
Angrim wrote:
i'm not sure why "The Great Trove War" causes so much consternation. it may have been suggested to trivialise the conflict, but in current usage it no more implies that the conflict was about a trove mine than "The Battle of the Pelennor Fields" implies that the War of the Rings was about a nice piece of farmland outside the gates of Minas Tirith.
|
To your point, they didn't call it the War of Pelennor Fields, now, did they?
|
Posted By: scaramouche
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 16:28
The_Dude wrote:
scaramouche wrote:
***
dementia..is the word, im sure...although im not quite at that stage...yet. seriously though...RES wasn't...you was at war with WE only. If I'm wrong, feel free to correct me as I didn't always keep an eye on your diplomatic stance throughout the war. |
While RES declared formal war on WE only, once Consone alliances engaged RES armies in defense of WE, RES, reciprocated. <span style="line-height: 1.4;">This is why you encountered so many RES armies reinforcing tigre's warg pit, and there were RES armies assisting in breaking sieges at H? cities, and other sundry actions versus non-WE Consone.</span> | Noted, that RES aided Tigre's city from my attacks due to the fact BSH was in alleigence with you in your declaration on us. I was unaware of your input in regards to movements against other consone alliances, this was probably due to your non declarations against them. This it seems, is a growing trend that I personally would like to see removed from warfare in Illy. your either at war or your not, but then I suppose anything goes in war?
------------- NO..I dont do the Fandango!
|
Posted By: Sloter
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 17:50
|
If name "The Great Trove War" is not good enough to descrbe conflict we could simply call it "The Trove War" :)I think people like mention of Trove in name because it sounds nice.If war started on lemonwood bough people would still come up with some name that has nice ring to it.
|
Posted By: Brandmeister
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 19:06
|
I like the Great Trove War. It's a reminder of how quickly an otherwise trivial situation can spiral out of control.
|
Posted By: Rorgash
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 19:16
the war was always in complete control.. atleast from my point of view ;)
-------------
|
Posted By: Grego
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 19:16
|
History geeks will probably know that actual Trove war ended on 20th October, and "great war" ( call is as you like ) lasted till 3rd April. I vote for Soup war.
|
Posted By: Kumomoto
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 19:20
Posted By: Sloter
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 19:29
|
It involved alliances that were not part of Consone on side that fought against Coalition so soup war is not precise description also.
|
Posted By: Grego
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 19:36
|
True, just don't forget it only spiced our Minestrone :)
|
Posted By: The_Dude
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 19:54
scaramouche wrote:
**** Noted, that RES aided Tigre's city from my attacks due to the fact BSH was in alleigence with you in your declaration on us. I was unaware of your input in regards to movements against other consone alliances, this was probably due to your non declarations against them. This it seems, is a growing trend that I personally would like to see removed from warfare in Illy. your either at war or your not, but then I suppose anything goes in war? |
Well, the other Consone's didn't declare on RES, they just attacked our camps. So, turnabout is fair play, right? I was a little surprised that Consone did not declare war on RES when RES declared on WE. But, yet Consone was still interested in stepping into the RES/WE conflict. Oh well, go figure.
The formal declaration, in game mechanic terms, is just changing colors to red from gold. For RES, only having WE formally at war meant all red units to RES were WE units which was sometimes useful info from watching the world map. It has always been common for wars to be waged without formal declarations in Illy - again, due to no real game mechanic. Also, often when a war is declared, the losing alliance simply fades away leaving the victor with a "war" listed on its alliance page for a long time.
I was surprised that WE decided to work over tigre's warg pit instead of any of the many RES cities in that area. Certainly the RES cities were a much greater threat to WE than that lone BSH city.
|
Posted By: Rorgash
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 20:57
|
yea.. never did understand their thinking there... i myself had a hand in killing many many waves of cav.. they just kept coming even tho the city was filled with troops -.-
but it was one of the only signs as no other attacks was really sent to other towns of ours in the war, it showed clearly that consone couldn't even siege and raze one town so close to theirs and at least a week away from any reinforcements from us, pitiful really.
-------------
|
Posted By: Grego
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 21:27
|
Call me stupid Rorgash, I am still glad and hope never will any city face destruction under my armies. Even exodus is harsh punishment for big settlements.
|
Posted By: Sloter
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 21:37
|
What is there to figure TD, if RES ties troops of WE then RES effects outcome of war.there is nothing strange in Consone attacking RES siege camps on WE.On that note if you wanted to fight WE on your own separatly from Coalition you could have done that before they were in war with many other allinaces..but hey like you said fair play and all... go figure.
|
Posted By: Rorgash
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 21:48
i cant Grego, i will be permanently banned.
-------------
|
Posted By: Sloter
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 21:55
|
Rorgahs do you like and respect your own alliance?
|
Posted By: Aral
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 21:57
I think it's foolish to believe that a few people on a forum thread will be able to define the name of the war for future conversation about it. People will call it what they wish to call it, and the ones they are conversing with will know what they are talking about regardless of whether they insist on "the great trove war" or "the soup war" as its name. It has been the largest conflict in Illyriad history, and the memory of the war will outlast any label pasted onto it.
------------- Aral Llc is not responsible for any grievous bodily harm sustained while reading this signature. No rights reserved.
|
Posted By: abstractdream
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 23:03
My 2 cents: The Consone War is what I am calling it. I saw someone in the Forums say that and it makes sense. Trove & Soup are both terms that take a shot at the other side so will no doubt be used in a limited manner. Consone War fits, describes the situation and doesn't piss anyone off (afaik.)
------------- Bonfyr Verboo
|
Posted By: The_Dude
Date Posted: 06 Apr 2013 at 23:28
abstractdream wrote:
My 2 cents: The Consone War is what I am calling it. I saw someone in the Forums say that and it makes sense. Trove & Soup are both terms that take a shot at the other side so will no doubt be used in a limited manner. Consone War fits, describes the situation and doesn't piss anyone off (afaik.) |
Yup.
|
Posted By: Kumomoto
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 00:58
|
True. And it fits with the established nomenclature (White War, Valar War, etc).
|
Posted By: Myr
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 01:53
|
The Consone War is what I call it as well.
|
Posted By: Rill
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 08:24
|
I prefer to call it the Late Unpleasantness.
|
Posted By: Mr Damage
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 08:37
|
Consone/Coalition War as per KP's thread is the name best suited imo.
|
Posted By: Grego
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 08:37
|
Consone deserve to be remembered not only by this war, it was also a dream about cooperation and friendship among different people and gamestyles united in that name. First attempt was unlucky, let's hope that future will be brighter.
|
Posted By: Kumomoto
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 08:48
Grego wrote:
First attempt was unlucky, let's hope that future will be brighter.
|
Well... let's hope the second attempt (or should I say the fourth or fifth attempt) is equally unsuccessful...
Global domination attempts in this game will be met head on. Period.
We are all happy with the game having multiple powers...
|
Posted By: scaramouche
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 09:17
Kumomoto wrote:
Grego wrote:
First attempt was unlucky, let's hope that future will be brighter.
|
Global domination attempts in this game will be met head on. Period.
|
This quote says it all...any attempt to inject creativity into the game will be severely dealt with....shame on you. P.S is the Illy site down..cos I cant seem to load the page up?
------------- NO..I dont do the Fandango!
|
Posted By: Kumomoto
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 09:38
scaramouche wrote:
Kumomoto wrote:
Grego wrote:
First attempt was unlucky, let's hope that future will be brighter.
|
Global domination attempts in this game will be met head on. Period.
|
This quote says it all...any attempt to inject creativity into the game will be severely dealt with....shame on you. P.S is the Illy site down..cos I cant seem to load the page up? |
No... Folks who try to codge together a huge gang that is many times the size of any existent entity with the express intent of taking down that entity are not going to be welcome!
|
Posted By: Kumomoto
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 09:40
It was a good attempt, though... You guys do deserve credit...
You actually not only convinced a lot of other innocent folks to join you,
But, when attacked, shedded alliances and people (and therefore majority status) really rapidly...
I've never seen a group contract as fast as you did.
But, if you really want to talk about what happened, then let's be real. You ended up at the same place as Valar and White.
All that effort was for naught.
And what is the crying shame is that many of the leaders who did this abandoned their folks. And left them to deal with the results of their actions.
|
Posted By: HATHALDIR
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 09:58
Can i remind all people posting on this thread it is about peace, gimme a weeks worth before we start planning the next war. If you want a good argument, tell me what the NEXT war will be called, now there is some scary projecting!
------------- There's worse blokes than me!!
|
Posted By: Anjire
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 10:04
HATHALDIR wrote:
Can i remind all people posting on this thread it is about peace, gimme a weeks worth before we start planning the next war. If you want a good argument, tell me what the NEXT war will be called, now there is some scary projecting!
|
The Blood Broken Lands War 
------------- http://elgea.illyriad.co.uk/a/p/26125" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Ander
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 15:33
|
Kumo, Grego was already the founder of one of the biggest alliances when he left it to found Absa. If you think that he is the kind of person looking for world domination, you are probably mistaken.
In the Absa alliance forum, you can see the long term goals of Absa in an old thread. It was to stay as a small alliance and not loose interest in the game by rushing.
What did you achieve by destroying our towns? Prevented world domination? Good for you! 
|
Posted By: twilights
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 16:19
wasnt this over last week, thats like ancient history, oh i forgot, ur all old .....time to move on...factions are coming! and nice job everyone...time to amend and make new alliances to gain the throne.....a game of thrones
|
Posted By: Grego
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 18:46
|
Indeed, twi. I am awaiting for long to hail our young King Sigurd, and pray that he will become wiser and marrier than our current rulers are.
|
Posted By: opk
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 19:37
Kumomoto wrote:
No... Folks who try to codge together a huge gang that is many times the size of any existent entity with the express intent of taking down that entity are not going to be welcome!
|
With your "entity" stories it sounds like Consone's ultimate goal was to take down H?. Since when?
White obviously wanted to take H? down, but it certainly wasnt the aim of Consone. Do you really think Jasche would have announced officially the creation of this project if his hiden evil plan was to grow a major force to take you down? Let me laugh. If their real plan was so, ties would have been kept secret and revealed the D-day of war for world domination only... oh wait, that's exactly what you did.
During all the war you have proclamed Consone was a major force or entity created to dominate Illy. But still i dont buy this propaganda. Maybe Consone would have brought some competition during tourneys (and even im not sure of that as alliances of Consone would have been forced to fight each other), but it never threatened H? other than by its size. And if i remember well, it was even H? who constantly provoked notely VIC about land claims or so. War was even started on Absa while they were self defending against a siege... telling that self-defending against a siege was an offense and a reason for war... i mean now it makes me sincerely laugh. Before the war, nobody in Consone from what i know did anything against H?, and i never heard anybody in Consone ever saying to take H? down, not even as a joke.
So please dont say Consone actively wanted to take down H?. H? felt threatened by the size of Consone, that's a sure thing, and wanted to act before it grew more, but that only was a feeling. From my knowledge, in no time H? have been obviously threatened in any manner by any action. Consone needed some more time to mature and be better organisated (which have been said over and over) and clarify their objectives further for everyone, maybe should it have been officialised only when it was finalized... But it never intended to become a world mastermind or else... and as i said, if Consone leaders truely had bad intentions, you wouldnt have been officially awared of any such organisation... So in no time you can say Consone aimed at taking your place or anyone's. You only went at war cause you didnt know the Consone leaders very well, cause you didnt want to know them better, cause you got scared for you stats and cause you needed a "worthy" opponent to fight with anyway. That's all i can accept to read as to explain the initiation of this war.
But be sure i for one will forgive H? when enough water will have flowed under bridges. Just give it some time.
------------- Old Penitent Knight
|
Posted By: Deranzin
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 19:55
opk wrote:
Kumomoto wrote:
No... Folks who try to codge together a huge gang that is many times the size of any existent entity with the express intent of taking down that entity are not going to be welcome!
|
During all the war you have proclamed Consone was a major force or entity created to dominate Illy. But still i dont buy this propaganda. |
Nobody cares what you buy personally, but everyone does care for facts ... now if you think that they made such a topic : http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/consone_topic4209.html" rel="nofollow - http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/consone_topic4209.html to show off their strength and never meant to use it, then do tell us how you define "intimidation tactics" .?.
|
Posted By: DeathDealer89
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 20:05
|
I get it now. OPK is taking the word 'fantasy' in fantasy game a little to seriously. Because pretty much every 'fact' he mentioned in that post was a fantasy.
Also given that OPK doesn't even exit in game, no one cares because well an account with no units still can't do anything. So stop hiding and use ur real account name if you want to act like your important. Then again i guess thats part of your fantasy again isn't it.
Everything makes much more sense from that perspective, and perhaps its fun I shall join the like of OPK and rorgash(spelling?
I shall from hence forth believe I am king of illy as my first decree, OPK is no longer allowed to spout non-sense.
2nd decree I retire and leave everything to rorgash to figure out.
|
Posted By: scaramouche
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 20:42
Kumomoto wrote:
scaramouche wrote:
Kumomoto wrote:
Grego wrote:
First attempt was unlucky, let's hope that future will be brighter.
|
Global domination attempts in this game will be met head on. Period.
|
This quote says it all...any attempt to inject creativity into the game will be severely dealt with....shame on you. P.S is the Illy site down..cos I cant seem to load the page up? |
No... Folks who try to codge together a huge gang that is many times the size of any existent entity with the express intent of taking down that entity are not going to be welcome!
|
you say here that consone came into existence with intent to bring...H? down? so let me get this right....Consone stated to you that they intended to bring you down, hence the reason they created consone? This I find incredibly hard to believe and as head of the war council in WE at that time had never heard of any such intentions. Truthfully, I should not respond to malicious accusations such as this, but it is difficult to ignore your "holier than thou" outlook on people.
------------- NO..I dont do the Fandango!
|
Posted By: The_Dude
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 21:22
|
I don't think Consone was formed to destroy H?. I do think it was formed to stand against H? and all others in Illy that had what Consone wanted.
The announcement of Consone appeared to me at the time as intended to intimidate. Hence all the Consone posts about its size and expanse across Illy.
I noted increased aggression from various Consone members after its formation. I also noted no willingness by Consone to constrain its members from hostilities. Jasche's reply was always "This is not a Consone matter." It was a Consone matter. And now Consone doesn't matter.
|
Posted By: Sloter
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 21:40
|
What hostilities are you talking about?War is over and if you wish to repeat you opinion from time to time thinking that it will somehow become truth if you say it often enough you are wrong.What agresiv behaviour was there?Harvesting incidents?Those still happen and will continue to happen with or without Consone.As for Jasche he is not here to defend him self.Maybe you mean that time when you complained about Absa to Jasche about some harvesting incident, in that case you should have tried to talk things over with alliance whose player has made some incident.Jasche was right to reply that it is not Consone matter.As for agresive behaviour what ever happened to that food dolmen your player took 2sq from WE player?Consone is now gone, and for some reason you feel that you can just say things without any proof with nobody to contradict you.While Consone is gone you slander all alliances that were part of it.We did lost the war, but please dont spread lies or half truths.
|
Posted By: opk
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 21:55
|
I have nothing to hide. My name is OPK for Old Penitent Knight, read my signature.
OPK is my secondly made account. My first one was Mandarins31, an ex-leader in VIC.
I was one of those who had the idea about making a new kind of confederacy. So i know what is the root of Consone.
About my personal story, i left the game in last July, i think it was little after Jasche announced the creation of Consone on the forum, because i was too buisy IRL and it had to last for long. I came back on my alt, OPK when i had a bit more time, and i was astonished when i saw H? declared a war over Consone, it was in October.
I admit that i didnt really participate in the project of Consone much more than building up the concept and giving ideas, but i can tell you how i thought about this future organisation when i was first creating it's concept with the other leaders of VIC. Very basically, we noticed one thing: alliances all around Illyriad have confederations, but when you follow the links of the confederation of alliances, you can see it generally goes in all directions. Alliance A could be confed with Alliance B, alliance B confed with alliance C, and alliance C neutral with alliance A but being confed with an alliance D, which might be at war with A. While logically, you could think "the friends of my friends are my friends", so that alliance C should be confed with alliance A, cause C is confed with B which is confed with A. "The friends of my friends are my friends", friendly alliances should make groups of confederates, each alliance being confed with each other. Crows already do that, but maybe could it be interesting to see if we can have more intrication between the alliances of a ring of confederacies. Sounds very exciting! That's the root concept of what was then called Consone.
Consone certainly lacked of some organisation, maybe some players did some mistakes... i wasnt there between July and October, but i know my mates, and i know what were my and our aims. It was having fun in a prosperous alliance and a prosperous confederacy where we would develop friendship under the banner of a ring of confederacies. No harm intended to anyone, and we uphold to compete between friends during official tourneys. It was also planned (and some have been done) to create our own tourneys for players in the ring of confederacies (we had ideas for very funny games), or even share those tourneys with external alliances, all that with attractive prices. Well that was one of the plans we had for this confederacy... you may think we are "pink flowers" it all turned around fun and friendship... i know from personnal experience that there is nothing funnier than a friendly but strong competition between friends, with fair play and respect.
This was the root of the ring of confederacy then named Consone. An exciting project which would have certainly benefit to a lot of players in and outside it.
I personnally had much respect and admiration for H? leaders, who did so much for this game, notely by wiping out White, creating an atmosphere of peace, guides and calculation sheets, and the still best begginers alliance, T?. Why on earth would we have wanted to compete with H? for their leading role over Illy while they were doing it so well, permitting us to have projects like Consone? Though, I admit i wanted our alliance to be able to offer H? a fair fight during tourneys, would have been exciting to offer a real competition to H? one day. A game is made to have fun, and that's what we wanted to work on. We thought we could bring the game to a new degree of funnability, at least for the people involved in the confederacy, but for others too. Call me a dreamer or a fanciful person. Now i think we all were.
But it's a game, why should it be like in reality where we are all against each others following our own goals, which are the mask of our own profit? Why couldnt we be dreamers and make a game a different place than reality? Think about it. Yes again, i am a dreamer and a fanciful person, and i hope this wont change.
------------- Old Penitent Knight
|
Posted By: Kumomoto
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 22:25
|
I support your goals and aspirations, Mandarin. And hopefully they will all come true. Unfortunately, I don't believe that all the leaders of Consone shared your altruism. Regardless, now we can focus on having fun!
|
Posted By: The_Dude
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 23:19
|
Consone as a formal power-block was unnecessary to achieve the aims OPK describes. Internal tournaments would probably require dropping NAP/Confeds unless you used the old tournament sqs where peace of camp has been disabled. Nor was a power-block necessary for VIC to compete against H? during official tournaments. Nor was a power-block necessary for sharing a Chatzy or forum for multi-alliance communication.
The purpose of a power-block is to exert power. No more, no less. Either to dissuade others from confronting the block or to use the block to exert force on others. Unfortunately, Consone was a power-block with no leadership, as many Consone players stated many times publicly.
A train needs an engineer in the locomotive or else bad things are gonna happen to that train. 
|
Posted By: Grego
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2013 at 23:55
|
It is like talking with wall, no matter what you will remain cemented in your...believes?
|
Posted By: Hora
Date Posted: 08 Apr 2013 at 00:36
|
I'm really happy, that this war finally is over!
TD, Consone did have a off game forum to communicate for about one month, I think... And then we thought it was only fair to the community to openly state our close connections... thus noone could call us a conspiracy, or something like that.  I can state, that the fear of the small chance of getting picked by H? as a target after the Valar war was there in many alliances joining, but never had been the main reason. And definitly not to take over the lead anywhere. When coming together, I myself didn't even realize the huge number of pop we had combined, and obviously, we weren't prepared for war...
About the leadership thing... Consones military only was thought to snap in when attacked, thus when one alliance on itself meddles with another one on its own fault, the other leaders would offer advice, but had no means to interdict on one leader.
That WE (I think you were talking of that?) thing was bad timing (stated more than once in here), and as long as it would have been a dispute between only your two alliances, Consone would have stayed out of it. (But would have offered diplomacy!) Those sieges mingled up with the Coalition ones, and untwining that mess seems to have been impossible by neither side, thus it had been resolved at one time with the big one... (Friends again, TD?  )
The actual start of the Consone/Coalition War had been another case, as here we did estimate the reaction of Rhy as totally out of range, and wanted to prevent bigger damage on any cities while still negotiating. (And yes, attacking siege camps is a defensive act IMO.) Even that hadn't been a big deal, the emergency level had been on "any Consone player is free to send some assist to Absa towns". Other alliances might have concieved it other and thus the rest might be looked up in any history books written in future Illyriad. 
EDIT: Oh, and I would like to plead both sides to please let the old discussions rest in peace, or at least talk about it more nicely. The Coalition has won, and thus they are right, aren't they? 
|
Posted By: Llyorn Of Jaensch
Date Posted: 08 Apr 2013 at 00:39
All arguments for and against the war, motivations, politics etc have been made and exhausted.
This tread was for the purpose of informing that EE has surrended, nothing more.
Can those who wish to chase tails or bang heads please do so in the Bitter Sea. This is not the time, nor the place.
Thank you.
------------- "ouch...best of luck." HonoredMule
|
Posted By: Hora
Date Posted: 08 Apr 2013 at 00:41
Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote:
All arguments for and against the war, motivations, politics etc have been made and exhausted.
This tread was for the purpose of informing that EE has surrended, nothing more.
Can those who wish to chase tails or bang heads please do so in the Bitter Sea. This is not the time, nor the place.
Thank you.
|
+1, Thanks Llyorn
|
Posted By: The_Dude
Date Posted: 08 Apr 2013 at 01:08
topic drift did occur. ooops. Congrats again to EE for ending the war. Kudos.
|
Posted By: Mr Damage
Date Posted: 08 Apr 2013 at 06:42
|
LOJ to the rescue again, nice one mate.
|
Posted By: Ossian
Date Posted: 08 Apr 2013 at 10:51
Mr Damage wrote:
LOJ to the rescue again, nice one mate. |
Yes he did.
http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/topic4964_post65913.html#65913" rel="nofollow - http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/topic4964_post65913.html#65913
If people stiil feel the need to get things of their chest then I have set up a seperate forum in The Caravanserai
|
Posted By: KillerPoodle
Date Posted: 08 Apr 2013 at 14:28
Hora wrote:
EDIT: Oh, and I would like to plead both sides to please let the old discussions rest in peace, or at least talk about it more nicely.
|
+1
------------- "This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM
"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill
|
Posted By: KillerPoodle
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 14:48
Since TVM were signatories to the peace agreement agreed by EE at the end of the Consone war. The recent resumption of hostilities is a direct contravention of that peace agreement and it is now null and void. It is obvious from Hath's recent words that the entire negotiation was in bad faith and simply a way to buy them room to regroup and seek revenge.
All former Coaltion members are free to resume a diplomatic status of WAR with EE forthwith.
EE's breaking of the peace treaty and cowardly attacks against an alliance less than half their size demonstrate once more that Hath and EE are dishonorable and untrustworthy. They will not find it so easy to get peace a second time around.
------------- "This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM
"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill
|
Posted By: ES2
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 15:00
|
I do not follow.
------------- Eternal Fire
|
Posted By: KillerPoodle
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 15:05
EE agreed at the end of the Consone war to cease all hostilities against the coalition (which includes TVM). That was the first term in the peace agreement they agreed to.
By resuming hostilities against TVM they have broken the peace treaty and are back to being at war with whomever of the former coalition members who see fit to do so.
------------- "This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM
"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill
|
Posted By: ES2
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 15:08
Thank you.
------------- Eternal Fire
|
Posted By: Darkwords
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 15:57
KillerPoodle wrote:
EE agreed at the end of the Consone war to cease all hostilities against the coalition (which includes TVM). That was the first term in the peace agreement they agreed to.
By resuming hostilities against TVM they have broken the peace treaty and are back to being at war with whomever of the former coalition members who see fit to do so.
|
Considering how H were claiming the 'coalition' no longer existed and that Crow were evil cause we are the only large confed in illy. Doesn't it seem odd that H use this as an excuse to get involved in war due to some old personnal grudge (wait didn't H claim that as Crows motivation for defending their allies?).
H? ... Hypocritical? Oh never mind... that's very old news.
|
Posted By: AZADICAN
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 16:07
Darkwords wrote:
KillerPoodle wrote:
EE agreed at the end of the Consone war to cease all hostilities against the coalition (which includes TVM). That was the first term in the peace agreement they agreed to.
By resuming hostilities against TVM they have broken the peace treaty and are back to being at war with whomever of the former coalition members who see fit to do so.
|
Considering how H were claiming the 'coalition' no longer existed and that Crow were evil cause we are the only large confed in illy. Doesn't it seem odd that H use this as an excuse to get involved in war due to some old personnal grudge (wait didn't H claim that as Crows motivation for defending their allies?).
H? ... Hypocritical? Oh never mind... that's very old news.
|
LOL indeed +1
-------------
|
Posted By: Aurordan
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 16:15
|
KillerPoodle, beyond the grave dig here, you seem to be taking a different view of peace treaties than really anyone ever. Eight months later, if Eagles have a reason to go to war with an alliance who happens to be a signatory for other reasons, I doubt the mainstream thought is going to be that they are outside of their rights to do this. That said, it is correct (and obvious) that any party is of course free to respond to this (or any) action however they want.
|
Posted By: Starry
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 16:16
|
No, the hypocritical one is Hath who gave his word that he would honor the peace terms. Obviously Hath's word means nothing so don't paint H as hypocritical, we've tried very hard to keep the peace. Btw, H negotiated for the entire Coalition, whether it exists now or not, the terms applied to all alliances involved in the peace negotiations (which included TCol), we kept our word, EE did not.
Have fun bashing H, we honored our commitment and I am very proud of our stance.
------------- CEO, Harmless? Founder of Toothless?
"Truth never dies." -HonoredMule
|
Posted By: Darkwords
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 16:22
If it does not exist as H claim then EE have not broken the peace conditions as they can not attack a member of something that does not exist, are you really so blind you can't see that, or just blatantly lying the the entire Illy community?
EDIT: footnote - there is no painting required when someone blindly jumps into the hypocrisy paint pot.
|
Posted By: KillerPoodle
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 16:22
Aurordan wrote:
Eight months later, if Eagles have a reason to go to war with an alliance who happens to be a signatory for other reasons |
Firstly, it's 6 months.
Secondly - that's just the point - they have no other reasons. Their current war dec is revenge for TVM becoming involved in the Consone war (Hath stated it himself in so many words - "settle a grudge" was the term he used I believe) and so it's entirely relevant to the original agreement and their failure to keep it.
------------- "This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM
"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill
|
Posted By: KillerPoodle
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 16:25
Darkwords wrote:
If it does not exist as H claim then EE have not broken the peace conditions as they can not attack a member of something that does not exist, are you really so blind you can't see that, or just blatantly lying the the entire Illy community?
|
What relationship those alliances currently have between each other is irrelevant.
The agreement specifically listed out all involved alliances individually and EE agreed to cease hostilities with all of them.
Feel free to keep clutching at straws though.
------------- "This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM
"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill
|
Posted By: Darkwords
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 16:28
"Agreed to cease" LOL
Then they fulfilled their conditions, they are not time travelers, they can not change the fact that they did cease hostilities.
|
Posted By: Aurordan
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 16:37
KillerPoodle wrote:
Aurordan wrote:
Eight months later, if Eagles have a reason to go to war with an alliance who happens to be a signatory for other reasons |
Firstly, it's 6 months.
Secondly - that's just the point - they have no other reasons. Their current war dec is revenge for TVM becoming involved in the Consone war (Hath stated it himself in so many words - "settle a grudge" was the term he used I believe) and so it's entirely relevant to the original agreement and their failure to keep it.
|
Look, no. There were other reasons, I've seen them. This incited psudo-quote you're throwing around may indicated that this may have been one of them, but it also may not be. EE had legitimate reasons to declare. If Harmless? wants to defend them, that's ya'lls business, but this one-man smear campaign is really unseemly.
|
Posted By: Deranzin
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 16:40
Posted By: Aurordan
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 16:46
Deranzin wrote:
So what you ALONE saw and claim (and you are not sharing) is "legitimate reasons" and what is now common knowledge in the server with the screenshot is a "psudo-quote" .?. 
Your idea of facts is quite funny. 
|
Nobody asked me to share them. I don't really need to. It's no secret. Check out some player histories in TVM if you're interested. I've never heard of this "common knowledge" before now, but the psudo-quote remark was in reference to the fact that he put it in quotations, implying it was exact phrasing, while explicitly stating that he didn't remember what that exact phrasing was.
|
Posted By: Deranzin
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 17:02
Aurordan wrote:
I've never heard of this "common knowledge" before now, but the psudo-quote remark was in reference to the fact that he put it in quotations, implying it was exact phrasing, while explicitly stating that he didn't remember what that exact phrasing was. |
Well Hathaldir's actual quote was "time for revenge" which is a much stronger synonym for "settle a grudge" actually ... happy now .?.
Edit: And btw, when someone is "explicitly stating that he didn't remember what that exact phrasing was" then he cannot be also "implying it was exact phrasing" at the same time.
|
Posted By: Aurordan
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 17:21
|
He can if he puts it in quotes. Anyway, this was never at any time supposed to be the main point.
|
Posted By: KillerPoodle
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 18:09
Darkwords wrote:
"Agreed to cease" LOL
Then they fulfilled their conditions, they are not time travelers, they can not change the fact that they did cease hostilities.
|
So by your logic it would be fine for them to stop fighting for 5 minutes and then start again. They agreed to peace with TVM, they broke that agreement.
I'm not surprised it's a VALAR who is trying to spin this....
------------- "This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM
"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill
|
Posted By: Darkwords
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 18:18
I am merely going by what you have said yourself, no spin required from my side, simply an understanding of your very basic English.
No matter how many times you change your wording (spin) it is apparent to anyone with more than half a brain cell that you are no more justified in your actions than EE are in theirs.
Why you incessantly have to post such obvious BS propaganda to attempt to justify every action you take is beyond me and I am sure beyond many others. Unless you have some deep underlying opinion of yourself, through which you feel the need to bend the truth to excuse yourself.
|
Posted By: geofrey
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 18:29
KillerPoodle wrote:
EE agreed at the end of the Consone war to cease all hostilities against the coalition (which includes TVM). That was the first term in the peace agreement they agreed to.
By resuming hostilities against TVM they have broken the peace treaty and are back to being at war with whomever of the former coalition members who see fit to do so.
|
KP, EE did cease hostilities against the coalition. Without having seen the peace treaty between EE and H?, it seems like you are implying that "Cease hostilities" = "cease hostilities for all of eternity." I think there is room for debate on your interpretation, as you did not specify a time frame. Again I am basing this off of the above comments, and not anything that EE or H? discussed, so I am likely wrong.
Along a similar political thought, I have a quandary for you... since your initial peace treaty was with the entity of EE. If EE were to disband and all the members formed a new alliance with new governance/leadership, would you hold all of the same members to the previous treaty?
Not trying to poke fun or anything, just curious how the greatest Illyriad power views these sort of things.
------------- http://elgea.illyriad.co.uk/a/p/45534" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Aristeas
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 18:30
|
No Darkwords, in RL peacetreaties work like that. Even after 40 years Germany had to get the agreements of the winners of the second world war (though they very apparently weren´t allied anymore) for the reunion because it was against the peacetreaty of Potsdam that ended WW2 and splitted Germany... You may call the actions of H? overly and unneeded legalistic, but surly not unjustified. Diplomacy works with the assumptions, that treaties are to be kept, otherwise you wouldn´t need them anyways...
|
Posted By: Tyrande Whisperwinds
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 18:37
|
Ok, trying to see things from a neutral point of view, from the things i gathered so far here on the forums.. pardon me from the inconsistencies..i'm still a little bit confused.
ok, so after the Consone war ended EE agreed to a peace treaty that involved not to attack one of the Coaliation alliances anymore, right? And they declared war to TVM..i guess... And so H? declared war on EE because they've broken that treaty.. i guess ^^
Ok, so now from a neutral point of view. For how long will that peace treaty last? And there's no reason whatsoever that justifies that pact being broken? I mean, (this is merely an example).. let's say someone from TVM (i guess those were the involved folks KP mentioned) diplo's someone from EE... EE can't go to war with TVM because they have to honor the agreement.. but that would mean TVM (again, just an example) can do whatever they want with EE wihout fear of consequences.. Also, for how long would that treaty last? Forever?
Ok, other question.. So EE goes to war to honor a confed.. Wait, they can't, because if they honor a confed they break the treaty.. In all honesty, i can't believe EE accepted to such terms in the first place!!! If they did accept, without any observation whatsover, i must say i understand H? logic..
Now my personal ramblings..
I'm not a war person, i enjoy the pace of the game, with it's random tourney's and whatnot. But illy seems to be turning into a personal battlefield for some folks, and that is scaring ppl away. Half the server is being dragged into this!! I've been hearing talks of server wide war for weeks, and in all honesty this just seems to have been orchestrated a long time ago by some ppl behind the curtains (dunno who, b4 you ask), and now,we, the paws (sp?), are being dragged into this.. And i see talks of "revenge" and "settling things".. C'mon.. Really???? If you hate each other, drop your alliances and kill yourselves..don't drag other ppl to solve it!!! And here i thought warcraft was a violent game.. maybe i should return.. I still can finish Pandaria content.. -_-
ps. sorry for my EngRish..this is so not my first language..
|
Posted By: Darkwords
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 18:44
Aristeas wrote:
No Darkwords, in RL peacetreaties work like that. Even after 40 years Germany had to get the agreements of the winners of the second world war (though they very apparently weren´t allied anymore) for the reunion because it was against the peacetreaty of Potsdam that ended WW2 and splitted Germany... You may call the actions of H? overly and unneeded legalistic, but surly not unjustified. Diplomacy works with the assumptions, that treaties are to be kept, otherwise you wouldn´t need them anyways... |
And exactly what part of the peace treaty was broken???
Try reading my posts before you claim I am wrong. EE did cease hostilities for what has been about one quarter of this worlds existence. Just because H were incapable of wording the treaty the way they intended, or because they wish now that it were worded in another manner, does not put EE in the wrong.
P.S. Split is past tense. Its an irregular verb.
|
Posted By: Deranzin
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 18:49
Posted By: Aristeas
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 19:06
|
@Darkwords
The reunion was what broke the peacetreaty, because that peacetreaty included the split (and that´s why all parties again had to make a new agreement).
And indeed "agreed to cease" is unspecified in connection to time (as infitives don´t denote any time), but so it holds true for all time untill changed, at least that is a possible interpretation that H? seems to be referring to... (It is a problem in syllogistics, for example if "A is B" means "A is always B" or not)
P.S. Split is a town in Croatia :p ;) No, thanks for the correction! Can only improve my english...
|
Posted By: Darkwords
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 19:17
I'm talking about ingame not history, this is not a WWII discussion forum.
And for your information there are no syllogistics in any contracts/agreements which bear any legal standing or recognition. If a contract/agreement covers time then time will be denoted.
|
Posted By: Fenrisulven
Date Posted: 28 Oct 2013 at 19:23
Darkwords wrote:
And exactly what part of the peace treaty was broken???
Try reading my posts before you claim I am wrong. EE did cease hostilities for what has been about one quarter of this worlds existence. Just because H were incapable of wording the treaty the way they intended, or because they wish now that it were worded in another manner, does not put EE in the wrong.
P.S. Split is past tense. Its an irregular verb.
|
Dark - check your math. Illy has been in existence since Feb 2010, or about 44 months. EE managed to keep it's promise for 6 months, which is 13.6% of the existence of Illy, not one quarter as you claim. Either way, EE agreed to peace terms which they then reneged on by attacking one of the signatories to that peace treaty.
|
|