Who will be next?
Printed From: Illyriad
Category: The World
Forum Name: Politics & Diplomacy
Forum Description: If you run an alliance on Elgea, here's where you should make your intentions public.
URL: http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=4844
Printed Date: 17 Apr 2022 at 04:58
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Who will be next?
Posted By: Rorgash
Subject: Who will be next?
Date Posted: 09 Mar 2013 at 01:26
|
So, Who will be the next to join the losers of this massacre? Not many left so Place your bets ^^ ------------- 
|
Replies:
Posted By: Jack Sheridan
Date Posted: 09 Mar 2013 at 01:46
|
Ah go climb a tree yah silly orc. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "It was the losing side I was on, but I'm still not convinced it was the wrong side." |
Posted By: Diomedes
Date Posted: 09 Mar 2013 at 08:11
|
Fortunately, I was on the true "winning" side.... namely the side that chose to stay out of the war ------------- "Walk in the way of the good, for the righteous will dwell in the land" |
Posted By: Gossip Boy
Date Posted: 09 Mar 2013 at 09:27
|
I wanna see some orc on orc action
------------- Elessar2 [08:34]<Rill> when you've just had part of your brain taken out, you lack a certain amount of credibility <KillerPoodle> I can say anything I like and it is impossible to prove or disprove |
Posted By: Hora
Date Posted: 09 Mar 2013 at 15:12
...but from a safe distance, with all the blood, spit and mud flying of in all directions
 |
Gossip Boy wrote:Posted By: Epidemic
Date Posted: 09 Mar 2013 at 17:48
| Talk about being a poor winner... |
Posted By: ES2
Date Posted: 09 Mar 2013 at 18:14
To the victor..the spoils ------------- Eternal Fire |
Posted By: Rorgash
Date Posted: 11 Mar 2013 at 11:53
|
seeing the latest sieges landing, i will put 1m on EE -------------
|
Posted By: Ossian
Date Posted: 11 Mar 2013 at 13:12
Khazukan! Uzkul!
 |
Posted By: Auraya
Date Posted: 11 Mar 2013 at 15:31
^ This. +1 Dio.
|
Posted By: Grego
Date Posted: 11 Mar 2013 at 17:23
Time will tell. |
Posted By: Deranzin
Date Posted: 12 Mar 2013 at 10:09
Well, it is true that traders and generally neutral alliances had a great potential of profit from the war and it is true that all the troops that were expended from both sides cost a huge chunk of time and money, there remains the benefit of all the XP (both in commanders and "XP" as in playing the game) that was gained from both sides which will be a benefit to any upcoming tournament. One could say that the war turned gold and resources into commander XP and while this is not a direct gain, it could be quite beneficial in the lond run.
 |
Posted By: Aha
Date Posted: 12 Mar 2013 at 22:21
| It's more the player experience. And it's not so beneficial for the next tournament but for the next war. |
Posted By: vty
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 01:18
|
Oh really? Remind me what BSH did, please, I'll wait |
Posted By: Sisren
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 09:22
The valiantly stood against egotistical bullies like you to start. 'just saying... ------------- Illy is different from Physics- Reactions are rarely Equal, and rarely the opposite of what you'd expect... |
Posted By: Ossian
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 10:56
This thread is just another example of the way Alliances like [Dark] and [BSH] are looking to wreck genuine peace negotiations between the major alliances that "actually" fought in the war as opposed to those sat on the sidelines and flamed and trolled like gameplayer of [Dark] and Rorgash of [BSH]. Neither of these players can be described as valiant but they certanly give the impression of being egoistical.
I always felt that if there were any true villains in the war it was indeed the alliances like Dark and BSH who harbour players who are just out to create mischief.
|
Posted By: Anjire
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 11:43
|
Regarding villains: I would state that my opinion of a true villain is a player that hides behind anonymity and threatens training alliances rather than the actual alliance(s) they have a personal beef with. ------------- http://elgea.illyriad.co.uk/a/p/26125" rel="nofollow">  |
Posted By: Rorgash
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 14:07
Well... not sure about the exact count, but the number towns i personally had troops at i think is 7, all which have been razed. might be more as this war has gone on for quite some time and there might have been some more at the beginning i have forgotten about, they were all so weak after all, not really worth remembering.
-------------
|
Posted By: twilights
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 14:16
| geez i was more logistics and allowed others to control my troops which i think were used for strategic gains and not just for bullying. oh well some people are just totally clueless in what is actually occurring in the game. grins, but i have to admit that was a pretty good troll flame. huggsssssssssss |
Posted By: Halcyon
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 15:40
You name Dark and BSH, gameplayer and Rogrash "villains". We in Dark committed no atrocities whatsoever. We conducted strategic warfare and targeted mostly the strongest opponents we could find in our area (Vic). We fought valiant, honorable warriors like Daene, Elanor and others and spared others whom we considered a small challenge. I presume that BSH did the same. gameplayer's troops fought in almost all our battles and tens if not hundreds of thousands of her troops were lost. She most certainly did not sit on the side lines.
|
Posted By: Diomedes
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 20:49
|
Food for thought: The first casualty in war is truth; the second casualty is humility ------------- "Walk in the way of the good, for the righteous will dwell in the land" |
Posted By: scaramouche
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 20:52
------------- NO..I dont do the Fandango! |
Posted By: Rorgash
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 21:16
yea because the losers arent losers, we are all winners... bs -------------
|
Posted By: geofrey
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 21:18
your forgot the H  ------------- http://elgea.illyriad.co.uk/a/p/45534" rel="nofollow">  |
Posted By: Kumomoto
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 23:52
Only one "n", but still v. funny! |
Posted By: vty
Date Posted: 14 Mar 2013 at 02:47
I'm hardly a bully.
|
Posted By: Kompanion
Date Posted: 14 Mar 2013 at 04:18
|
I am proud to be a member of Dark. I was not afraid to join in the war because I personally felt like I knew which side I wanted to be on. However, with that said, there are some great people in Consone. My personal observation is that Illy has some level of a moral value system and there are people willing to enforce these values if necessary. Try sieging or bullying a newer player if you doubt this to be true. I am confident that Dark would not sit idle if this were taking place in our area. Perhaps there were members on both sides who had perceptions that bullying was taking place. I will not fight over who was right or who was wrong. I will only argue that honor is for those who chose to fight for what they believed to be right. Regardless of which side they were on. |
Posted By: Hadus
Date Posted: 14 Mar 2013 at 13:56
|
Without villains, there can be no heroes. Think about that before we get on another tangent about "bullies". Attitudes like Rorgash' and gameplayer's (which are both quite distinct, mind you) frustrated me greatly when I first got here. Now I realized how much color they bring to the community. While I don't think I could stand it if EVERYONE shared their attitude, having a couple troublemakers fuels rivalries and adds to the emotional investment that makes Illyriad such a unique and gratifying experience. ------------- http://elgea.illyriad.co.uk/a/p/157483" rel="nofollow"> 
|
Posted By: Beecks
Date Posted: 14 Mar 2013 at 20:53
|
Rorgash is a character. He brings a unique voice to the forums and Vty is my favorite Absa! |