Release from Illyriad Ministry of Truth
Printed From: Illyriad
Category: The World
Forum Name: Politics & Diplomacy
Forum Description: If you run an alliance on Elgea, here's where you should make your intentions public.
URL: http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=4395
Printed Date: 17 Apr 2022 at 15:01 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Release from Illyriad Ministry of Truth
Posted By: LionArse
Subject: Release from Illyriad Ministry of Truth
Date Posted: 25 Oct 2012 at 21:39
|
Well. The current sad state of affairs in beautiful Illyriad has reached the point where I feel no choice but to wade in to the cesspool that passes for a great deal of posts on this forum. Most of the posts are of the following types: pedantic, bravado, spin, ego stroking (both self and of others), inability to refrain from seeking attention, self-serving, attempts to troll one party or the other, and outright lies. Very few posts simply convey information, ask questions, or offer ideas and opinions in a manner that would encourage any sincere response save one born out of baser emotions. Sad.
I can and will simply tell you what this war is, at least at the beginning before the vultures and opportunists became involved. Most of you know whether you admit it or not. H? has been opposed to the very concept of any group such as Consone. Consone was formed, and H?, or more specifically people such as Kumo and the boys, went pouty bang bang and begin devising ways they could remove the threat to themselves they felt this posed. There were several that were on the table, and these no later than July. Don't believe any denials, they are flat out lies. I've heard the plans and discussions myself. One was use of another alliance to act as a stalking horse to initiate hostilities with a Consone alliance. This alliance would have no public connection to H?, but "private diplomacy" would be in place with them. When an opportunity to engage in a conflict with any Consone member could conceivably be used as the cause for war, that opportunity would be used. The "private diplomatic ties" would then provide the fig leaf H? wanted to enter the war. Consone would then either have to act to protect a member alliance, as it is one of their stated purposes, or not act and lose any semblance reality as a viable group. Either way H? gets what it wants, the elimination of Consone as a threat. Sound familiar? Resemble any thing going on?
It is a perfectly good strategy, simple and well thought out, if a tad obvious. I don't object to it at all. What I object to is the laughable and cowardly denials and lies offered up in defense of it. This a war game, as you say, many of you ad nauseum. If done openly it could be admired, even while being opposed by those targeted as well as their friends and allies. But knowing the reaction of the Illyriad world at large, and in particular concerned with being able to spin and blow, lie and threaten in GC and the Forum to keep people from thinking of the consequences of such an action, the lie has to be maintained. Because if all this was openly know to be what it is, people would really have to make some decisions. Luckily so far, most of the shuffling masses are too afraid of taking a stand. There are many noticeable exceptions to this though, aren't there? That came as a bit of a surprise!
This ends my first communication in to the realities of Illyriad. I do not apologize for the length of this post, even though so many feel the need to offer "witty" comments on how they quit reading at such and such a point, or how they had a myriad of better things to do with their time than read it. I always get a good chuckle at those, you people who say such things live on the forum and GC. what you really mean is you lack the will, intelligence, or attention span to focus on anything beyond comic book blurbs and taunts.
I will not respond to any questions or attempts to draw me out. I do not seek dialog, but to merely offer information. What you do with it, if anything, is up to you. Shortly I will post on the many mistakes of Consone, and point out some of the less obvious beneficiaries of our current hostilities. My admiration goes to those of you who are able to disagree with out being disagreeable, and who admire honesty above cleverness. Now, you same predictable people, offer your opinions, +1's to supposed clever posts, and pointless diversions, and your changeable "beliefs" that seem have a magical ability of being the exact opposite of your many numerous posts in threads long past.
|
Replies:
Posted By: Hora
Date Posted: 25 Oct 2012 at 22:05
|
Thanks for the information.
As I'm a Consone player, we suspected it to be this way. If you really have intel into H?'s interior discussions, I can only guess at, as you were so wise as to stay inkognito.
Now I'm really interested in your view on Consone.
|
Posted By: Loud Whispers
Date Posted: 25 Oct 2012 at 22:07
LionArse wrote:
It is a perfectly good strategy, simple and well thought out, if a tad obvious. I don't object to it at all. What I object to is the laughable and cowardly denials and lies offered up in defense of it.
|
Well some have. The issue is no one person from either side will openly speak the same opinion.
Tbh when I saw the thread title I thought it was going to be a list of facts about the war that couldn't be refuted, i.e. what attacks happened when, who declared war on who when, the sieges, official statements and the like. You make an incredibly logical argument and for the most part it's sound, but it's still an argument. Another "discussion" thread to be thrown under the grinders.
|
Posted By: geofrey
Date Posted: 25 Oct 2012 at 22:10
|
If I am to understand you correctly, the purpose of your post was to give transparency to the initiation of this war. And to finally clarify once and for all any theories that H? orchestrated this whole thing.
While I find your purpose very admirable, there is 1 flaw in your logic. Anyone can make an anonymous forum account and post whatever truths they want. They can sound mysteriously informed and in the know without mentioning who they actually are. So long as you do not identify yourself by your in-game handle, and therefor what information you would actually be privy to, the authenticity of your post remains questionable.
I want to believe you, but I must remain skeptical that this is but another move to be played in the world of Illyriad. Curse you George Martin for making me know everyone is plotting something.
------------- http://elgea.illyriad.co.uk/a/p/45534" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Loud Whispers
Date Posted: 25 Oct 2012 at 22:13
geofrey wrote:
Curse you George Martin for making me know everyone is plotting something.
| Ignorance is bliss...Ful ignorance :P
|
Posted By: Aurordan
Date Posted: 25 Oct 2012 at 22:16
geofrey wrote:
While I find your purpose very admirable, there is 1 flaw in your logic. Anyone can make an anonymous forum account and post whatever truths they want. They can sound mysteriously informed and in the know without mentioning who they actually are. So long as you do not identify yourself by your in-game handle, and therefor what information you would actually be privy to, the authenticity of your post remains questionable. |
You don't need access to secret planning sessions to work any of that out though. It's pretty obvious.
No offense, but there's really no news here.
|
Posted By: Mandarins31
Date Posted: 25 Oct 2012 at 22:30
Aurordan wrote:
geofrey wrote:
While I find your purpose very admirable, there is 1 flaw in your logic. Anyone can make an anonymous forum account and post whatever truths they want. They can sound mysteriously informed and in the know without mentioning who they actually are. So long as you do not identify yourself by your in-game handle, and therefor what information you would actually be privy to, the authenticity of your post remains questionable. |
You don't need access to secret planning sessions to work any of that out though. It's pretty obvious.
No offense, but there's really no news here. |
Yes, but it has the advantage to be well and clearly explained. Of course, no evidence can be given by this anonymous writer, and even if he gave his in game name, i dont see in what it could've been much of an evidence. Even screen shots of discussions can be modified, anyone announcing an evidence on a forum, actually is giving none... and anyway, private conversations copy/past are prohibited here. It's a forum, so everything is open to debate, which can explain why some play with it, and play on the semantics of anything as a lawyer would do. What is said above correspond to the sudoku i have. Im interested in reading your reflexion about Consone's mistakes, and beneficiaries of this conflict, even if i suppose it will join mine.
|
Posted By: geofrey
Date Posted: 25 Oct 2012 at 22:32
Loud Whispers wrote:
geofrey wrote:
Curse you George Martin for making me know everyone is plotting something.
| Ignorance is bliss...Ful ignorance :P |
"Always keep your foes confused. If they are never certain who you are or what you want, they cannot know what you are like to do next. Sometimes the best way to baffle them is to make moves that have no purpose, or even seem to work against you. Remember that, when you come to play the game."
------------- http://elgea.illyriad.co.uk/a/p/45534" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: geofrey
Date Posted: 25 Oct 2012 at 22:34
Loud Whispers wrote:
Tbh when I saw the thread title I thought it was going to be a list of facts about the war that couldn't be refuted, i.e. what attacks happened when, who declared war on who when, the sieges, official statements and the like. |
Would love a post exactly as you described.
------------- http://elgea.illyriad.co.uk/a/p/45534" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Chaos Armor
Date Posted: 25 Oct 2012 at 22:56
geofrey wrote:
Loud Whispers wrote:
Tbh when I saw the thread title I thought it was going to be a list of facts about the war that couldn't be refuted, i.e. what attacks happened when, who declared war on who when, the sieges, official statements and the like. |
Would love a post exactly as you described. |
Would be nice to know what was going on...
___ This thread is obviously an opinion and holds no elements of evidence, per se. However it is a nicely stated and well orchestrated narrative. For that I commend you. But does anyone really know what happened? Probably not and it will most likely remain a mystery.
I like the idea that you'll post your opinion on both sides of the line. It puts you in the middle of the "H? is evil" conspirators party and the "Consone is a bully" conspirators party.
Really there was no point to my post since everyone already knows what I'm saying but I felt I had to get in on the action. 
|
Posted By: twilights
Date Posted: 25 Oct 2012 at 23:37
|
the only i know is that a few ego trips ruin a whole tournament for the rest of the people in illy, i dont know how the others feel but i was dragged into this war as well as alot of other people by secret backstabbing dealings, but that seems the way that illy is going, the current leadership of several of the alliances involved is to look out for their own egos first instead of the good of their membership. there are so many people that were caught up in this war that should not be in it and of course these ego character leaders just make rules saying they will not attack anyone small and gosh they will only take 30 percent of strength of a person, or some such garbage. what they dont realize that many of the lesser players change playing styles for the war and what a disruption this is to those players. i say its time to speak up to these egos and tell them to form an alliance like the members of nc did and fight their so call wars out and leave the rest of us people out of their so call wars....and those being attacked there is no way to win, just give it up...and lets all thank these leaders for us losing the chance of playing an illy wide tournament..u call yourself leaders of the game, then u should respect it, poor job to all leaders involved, especially those with all their secret ways and dealings...oh by the way i went into the safety of a trainning alliance, i hope u rspect that... and tell my bf he better take me out saturday and not play this dumb war....im still mad at him for last weekend...dance dance...i love justin bieber!
|
Posted By: Hadus
Date Posted: 26 Oct 2012 at 00:26
I wish to challenge your belief that H? is to be admonished for lies and subversion. How can you admire and respect a plan to destroy a perceived rival using surprise and hidden motives, and then accuse them for the very tactics which they required to carry out their plan?
Simply put, manipulation of facts is part of war. This isn't a duel; there is no honor to be won if you end up face down in a ditch. If deceit and lies are one path to victory, does it make any sense o remove that option on moral grounds, especially when there is no guarantee your opponent won't do the same?
There is only thing we can be certain of: at the end of this war, the story that will be considered "correct" is the one told by the winner. It's been that way in real life since the beginning of recorded history, and it will be no different here.
------------- http://elgea.illyriad.co.uk/a/p/157483" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: dunnoob
Date Posted: 26 Oct 2012 at 00:26
gameplayer wrote:
a few ego trips ruin a whole tournament for the rest of the people in illy | Alliance tournaments can be fun for players in the alliances on page one, for most other players they are rather boring. If 11 of the top 20 alliances get into a war distracting them from this tournament it is actually good for some smaller alliances, who would be otherwise squeezed out by H?, VIC, and so on.
|
Posted By: Loud Whispers
Date Posted: 26 Oct 2012 at 00:46
Hadus wrote:
There is only thing we can be certain of: at the end of this war, the story that will be considered "correct" is the one told by the winner. It's been that way in real life since the beginning of recorded history, and it will be no different here.
|
Since recorded history - when information could be suppressed. Whoever wins, the other side's arguments, propaganda and insights will still float around in the forums and with the people who sided with them. A minor detail, but I think this is just too large with too many people listening for it to die down like that.
|
Posted By: JimJams
Date Posted: 26 Oct 2012 at 00:57
Lion...
-------------
|
Posted By: Thes Hunter
Date Posted: 26 Oct 2012 at 02:41
Nice Bob Geldof look there JimJams.
------------- The image in my avatar is a chalk pastel drawing I did as part of the Imagine Yellowstone Art competition.
|
Posted By: Myzel
Date Posted: 26 Oct 2012 at 10:22
Hadus wrote:
I wish to challenge your belief that H? is to be admonished
for lies and subversion. How can you admire and respect a plan to
destroy a perceived rival using surprise and hidden motives, and then
accuse them for the very tactics which they required to carry out their
plan?
Simply put, manipulation of facts is part of war. This
isn't a duel; there is no honor to be won if you end up face down in a
ditch. If deceit and lies are one path to victory, does it make any
sense o remove that option on moral grounds, especially when there is no
guarantee your opponent won't do the same?
|
You make a good point but it doesn't mean someone can't both
admire and admonish H?'s game. Deception can be part of war and I could
admire skillful use of it. I think RHY/H?'s feigned interest in peace
talks on the condition that VIC would stop breaking sieges was a stroke
of genius, really. But I think that it is still a game that can be
played with integrity (which, in fact, is a good strategy because other players respect it). Much of H? game has been tainted by namecalling, ridiculing and hateful accusations (although I'm not saying
they were the only ones to do it - players from the Consone side or
neutral flamers have been doing it as well). I morally can't respect
that. And when you think about it, much of the truth-twisting was done in such a half-assed way that hardly anyone actually ate it up. So even from a
purely strategic standpoint, I wouldn't respect this part of their game
because it wasn't skillful or subtle and only served to make themselves
look bad.
All in all I'd say H?'s plan was interesting. Its execution had its moments, but was a little too obvious which made the falsehoods all the more blatant. Of course, the game isn't over yet. Maybe they'll have something up their sleeve.
|
Posted By: Ossian
Date Posted: 26 Oct 2012 at 12:08
JimJams wrote:
Lion... |
...south end of a horse travelling north.
Established players from both sides of the H?/Consone divide will recognise that this player only ever appears to create discord at times like these. In this particular thread he seems to want to invoke bitter critcism of H?, Consone and almost every player that will comment on this issue.
I hope that ,ironically, his reappearance will cause H? to realise that there is no one in Consone who can be compared to Lionz for his irresponsible and negative attempts to manipulate the game. Jasche is not Lionz ( or Diabilto for that matter) as Consone is not White.
The reappearance of Lionz only serves to remind us that H? et al and Consone have much more in common than those who seek to promote bullying and trollish behaviour.
I hope his reappearance will cause both sides to look at at each other anew and realise the positive contributions that they have brought to the community in times of peace. The sooner we end this conflict the better
|
Posted By: glorfindel
Date Posted: 26 Oct 2012 at 15:23
LionArse wrote:
Well. The current sad state of affairs in beautiful Illyriad has reached the point where I feel no choice but to wade in to the cesspool that passes for a great deal of posts on this forum. Most of the posts are of the following types: pedantic, bravado, spin, ego stroking (both self and of others), inability to refrain from seeking attention, self-serving, attempts to troll one party or the other, and outright lies . . . I can and will simply tell you what this war is, at least at the beginning before the vultures and opportunists became involved.
|
You can now add "didactic" to your own list, as your post fills that category nicely.
|
Posted By: hellion19
Date Posted: 26 Oct 2012 at 17:00
Lots of the OP's post just is the opinion that they feel the war is and then turning it into what he wants to portray as insider knowledge.
Like I could say that I have insider knowledge and that this was a badly thought out plan that Consone would use SkB as a non consone member to push RHY into joining Consone. After the conflict between SkB happened they can send ABSA in and if ABSA can't win it then send in VIC. Perhaps this plan simply backfired when H? joined in and all the way upto the point that H? did join in they seemed fine with the war.
Seems about as legit as the OP.
|
Posted By: Hadus
Date Posted: 26 Oct 2012 at 17:24
Myzel wrote:
Hadus wrote:
I wish to challenge your belief that H? is to be admonished
for lies and subversion. How can you admire and respect a plan to
destroy a perceived rival using surprise and hidden motives, and then
accuse them for the very tactics which they required to carry out their
plan?
Simply put, manipulation of facts is part of war. This
isn't a duel; there is no honor to be won if you end up face down in a
ditch. If deceit and lies are one path to victory, does it make any
sense o remove that option on moral grounds, especially when there is no
guarantee your opponent won't do the same?
|
You make a good point but it doesn't mean someone can't both
admire and admonish H?'s game. Deception can be part of war and I could
admire skillful use of it. I think RHY/H?'s feigned interest in peace
talks on the condition that VIC would stop breaking sieges was a stroke
of genius, really. But I think that it is still a game that can be
played with integrity (which, in fact, is a good strategy because other players respect it). Much of H? game has been tainted by namecalling, ridiculing and hateful accusations (although I'm not saying
they were the only ones to do it - players from the Consone side or
neutral flamers have been doing it as well). I morally can't respect
that. And when you think about it, much of the truth-twisting was done in such a half-assed way that hardly anyone actually ate it up. So even from a
purely strategic standpoint, I wouldn't respect this part of their game
because it wasn't skillful or subtle and only served to make themselves
look bad.
All in all I'd say H?'s plan was interesting. Its execution had its moments, but was a little too obvious which made the falsehoods all the more blatant. Of course, the game isn't over yet. Maybe they'll have something up their sleeve.
|
You bring up an excellent point. I suppose I narrowed my own view by speaking purely from a strategic standpoint. Ironically, their attempts to sway public opinion only hurt their own PR.
------------- http://elgea.illyriad.co.uk/a/p/157483" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Drejan
Date Posted: 26 Oct 2012 at 18:36
"Release from Illyriad Ministry of Truth" ahahahahaha "Don't believe any denials, they are flat out lies." Oh right, you are THE TRUTH.. DON'T TRUST ANYONE ... except Mr.Anonymous! Cospiracy!!!
"Sound familiar? Resemble any thing going on?" Mhmm considering this has been written after the war... what should this prove?
". I've heard the plans and discussions myself. ...bla bla" Try harder please ... the cospiracy story has holes everywhere... We could have been in war for the EE-Dlord and Dlord-Druid issue on mines 1-2 months before all of that if H? was looking for a war as you said. What was different? - The alliances didn't look for external help (with EE we had 100k troops lost both sides but no external help eccept a few FF) - Dimplomatic channels were open. We could have easily declared war on EE for beeing attacked, Consone would have declared war on us, H? would have helped ecc ecc ecc. Truth is that H? did not need to plan any "casus belli".
|
Posted By: twilights
Date Posted: 26 Oct 2012 at 18:44
|
frankly i am totally amazed that people dont realize that this game encourages planting spies in other alliances, with the amount of accounts we allowed (2) and the ease of sitting accounts without any notice given to other players, its kind of hard to plot in ac and in game mail, lol, even right now there is probably someone in my other account sitting, and i am not even sure which account im writing this from.....but im blond
|
Posted By: Deranzin
Date Posted: 26 Oct 2012 at 19:16
LionArse wrote:
I will not respond to any questions or attempts to draw me out. I do not seek dialog, but to merely offer information.
|
This means you are PREACHING and the acceptance of your words is just a matter of pre-existing belief and the level of personal gullibility. 
Anyone can make a clone and pretend to be privy of secret information which he divulges for no personal gain other than a "love for truth" ... it is an old ploy, even older than the internet actually (there is even a person in our TV that claims that he is privy to information that "ONLY HIM and OTHER FOUR people in the whole europe know" and there are people - usually pentioners - that actually believe him  ), and I do not wish to comment anything else on a thread created by someone who loves TRUTH so much that he HIDES even his in game nickname. 
Judging only from that small, yet all important fact, you are more likely from Mars than any "ministry" containing "truth" in it title ... 
|
Posted By: hellion19
Date Posted: 26 Oct 2012 at 22:16
Deranzin wrote:
LionArse wrote:
I will not respond to any questions or attempts to draw me out. I do not seek dialog, but to merely offer information.
|
This means you are PREACHING and the acceptance of your words is just a matter of pre-existing belief and the level of personal gullibility. 
Anyone can make a clone and pretend to be privy of secret information which he divulges for no personal gain other than a "love for truth" ... it is an old ploy, even older than the internet actually (there is even a person in our TV that claims that he is privy to information that "ONLY HIM and OTHER FOUR people in the whole europe know" and there are people - usually pentioners - that actually believe him  ), and I do not wish to comment anything else on a thread created by someone who loves TRUTH so much that he HIDES even his in game nickname. 
Judging only from that small, yet all important fact, you are more likely from Mars than any "ministry" containing "truth" in it title ...  |
Perhaps the person that speaks with him is the voice of God? 
|
Posted By: Brids17
Date Posted: 26 Oct 2012 at 22:22
Drejan wrote:
What was different? |
The tournament. H? waited until the consone killed off their troops and then declared war. And this is evident in the distinct lack of effort on their part during the entire tournament. At least that much was planned. As far as the whole conspiracy theory typed out by some guy hiding behind a username that resembles LionHeartz, I don't really believe much of it. But I do believe this was planned before the tourney started.
-------------
|
Posted By: hellion19
Date Posted: 26 Oct 2012 at 22:29
Brids17 wrote:
Drejan wrote:
What was different? |
The tournament. H? waited until the consone killed off their troops and then declared war. And this is evident in the distinct lack of effort on their part during the entire tournament. At least that much was planned. As far as the whole conspiracy theory typed out by some guy hiding behind a username that resembles LionHeartz, I don't really believe much of it. But I do believe this was planned before the tourney started. |
Except if you read the first 7 pages of the main thread it was pretty obvious that H? had very little involvement as to how things happened. Not until the 8th page that they interfered and its because VIC decided to join in and assist in the fight against RHY which was already fairly even with RHY vs SkB and ABSA. Once VIC involved itself so did H? on page 8. Unless H? also planned to push VIC in to help fight RHY which then thats going to feed all sorts of other conspiracies because they obviously have a great deal of power that no one knows about to control every other guilds actions as well.
|
Posted By: The_Dude
Date Posted: 27 Oct 2012 at 00:01
hellion19 wrote:
**** Perhaps the person that speaks with him is the voice of God? 
| No. I have never spoken with him.
|
Posted By: Bonaparta
Date Posted: 27 Oct 2012 at 00:44
Posted By: Mandarins31
Date Posted: 27 Oct 2012 at 00:53
hellion19 wrote:
Unless H? also planned to push VIC in to help fight RHY which then thats going to feed all sorts of other conspiracies because they obviously have a great deal of power that no one knows about to control every other guilds actions as well.
|
If they got informed by RHY that Absa attacked a standing army of them, H? didnt need supernatural mental powers to involve VIC in the conflict. It would have been quite easy to ask RHY to start sieges against Absa; and if Consone mutual defense wasnt a fake agreement, they surely would invole the rest of Consone, counting VIC. Then, announcing secret confed bonds with RHY would put them in a "legal" position to start a war against Absa and VIC, the rest of Consone would logically follow. No mind control stufs; this theory could be true as it's a short logical continuation of causes and consequences anyone with the apropriate knowledge would be able to plan.
So for me, H? involvment could easily have started by asking RHY to siege Absa. But not before as H? couldnt have planned Absa would help Skb if RHY was hostile with Skb, so they are not behind it.
H? started carefully on the tourney, to let other alliances kill each other and then enter in the tourney with almost full power (they used some units though), which is a classic and viable tactic. At the same time, maybe were they paranoiac about Consone members using the same strategy and letting H? lose troops first, which would put H? in disadvantage if Consone decided to start a war against them (but the facts shew the non-machiavelic plans of Consone, who played fully from the start of the tourney). If Consone alliances didnt play the tourney at all, it's obvious H? wouldn't either.
H? were waiting for the best occasion to start a conflict against Consone. All the best conditions have been luckily or partially luckily gathered and so they didnt hesitate to jump in.
|
Posted By: Sisren
Date Posted: 27 Oct 2012 at 00:55
Drejan wrote:
...
We could have been in war for the EE-Dlord and Dlord-Druid issue on mines 1-2 months before all of that if H? was looking for a war as you said. ...
|
Same holds truth for Dark/WoT - EE months past. Rather similar to the RHY - SkB/ABSA thing in a lot of ways...
------------- Illy is different from Physics- Reactions are rarely Equal, and rarely the opposite of what you'd expect...
|
Posted By: Rorgash
Date Posted: 27 Oct 2012 at 00:55
|
because if "god" were a she we would all be killed once a month -.-
-------------
|
Posted By: GM Luna
Date Posted: 27 Oct 2012 at 01:01
|
I'd say get back on topic if I could even tell what the topic is here. But I'm certain it is not about either religion or questionably tasteless jokes about women, so lets stop with both of those. Thanks.
Luna
------------- GM Luna | Illyriad Community Manager | community@illyriad.co.uk
|
Posted By: twilights
Date Posted: 27 Oct 2012 at 03:49
actually i am a goddess and i train my men all month long but a spy is a spy is a spy and this game is loaded with them. get a clue, you never know who is actually playing in your alliance and what information is being gathered and shared with others and the writing of it in the forums just means u have horrible security in your alliance. maybe u are not as secure as u think and payback is coming. there is a saying about kicking a dog when its down, but again i have to wonder of that dog when it just doesnt know when its beaten. of course the leaders in this war just seem to care about their own egos....my bf better be reading this and know what happens if its not my ego being taken care of...there will be payback
|
Posted By: Kumomoto
Date Posted: 27 Oct 2012 at 04:04
I have found true, enduring entertainment from this post.
Some of the responses have been difficult to understand...
But wow! I am really flattered that the mysterious Minister Lion of Truth thinks that I and a group of boys (and you really do NOT know H? well... or obviously are NOT part of the intimate "inner circle" because we are led just as much by ladies as by men). Proof positive this person doesn't know H?...
But... I can practice my Mwahahahahha sounds... or hook my pinkie in my lip and utter "one BILLION gold pieces" if it might make the Lion Minister of Truth happy...
|
Posted By: hellion19
Date Posted: 27 Oct 2012 at 04:20
Mandarins31 wrote:
hellion19 wrote:
Unless H? also planned to push VIC in to help fight RHY which then thats going to feed all sorts of other conspiracies because they obviously have a great deal of power that no one knows about to control every other guilds actions as well.
|
If they got informed by RHY that Absa attacked a standing army of them, H? didnt need supernatural mental powers to involve VIC in the conflict. It would have been quite easy to ask RHY to start sieges against Absa; and if Consone mutual defense wasnt a fake agreement, they surely would invole the rest of Consone, counting VIC. Then, announcing secret confed bonds with RHY would put them in a "legal" position to start a war against Absa and VIC, the rest of Consone would logically follow. No mind control stufs; this theory could be true as it's a short logical continuation of causes and consequences anyone with the apropriate knowledge would be able to plan.
So for me, H? involvment could easily have started by asking RHY to siege Absa. But not before as H? couldnt have planned Absa would help Skb if RHY was hostile with Skb, so they are not behind it.
H? started carefully on the tourney, to let other alliances kill each other and then enter in the tourney with almost full power (they used some units though), which is a classic and viable tactic. At the same time, maybe were they paranoiac about Consone members using the same strategy and letting H? lose troops first, which would put H? in disadvantage if Consone decided to start a war against them (but the facts shew the non-machiavelic plans of Consone, who played fully from the start of the tourney). If Consone alliances didnt play the tourney at all, it's obvious H? wouldn't either.
H? were waiting for the best occasion to start a conflict against Consone. All the best conditions have been luckily or partially luckily gathered and so they didnt hesitate to jump in.
|
Your statement has a lot of If's that need to happen to make it true. So now H? is responsible for trying to get everyone to gang up on RHY? Again its silly to really assume that they are responsible for every other guilds actions whether poorly thought out or not. Consone tried a very heavy handed tactic and had their hand slapped.
The agreement of Consone from what I understand was a defensive agreement while the agreement was put to the test because of an aggressive action by Consone rather than them being on the defensive. So does this mean that anyone in the alliance of Consone can start a fight with someone then when they are retaliated on its now a Consone issue? If not... its what happened here. Ultimately meaning that Consone is not a defensive agreement but rather an offensive one that can be used by anyone without a central authority to avoid it being anything but that.
Now saying all of that... now H? is blamed for orchestrating all of it. So they setup a war that was between 2 equal sides (RHY vs ABSA and SkB) so they apparently knew VIC was going to step in and help beat down RHY further in a war that was escalated by Consone (ABSA) further than it needed to be. This all obviously planned by H? as they can obviously see all decisions and make them for all parties by themselves.
Just remember that because someone digs their own hole doesn't mean someone else plotted it. You don't see most people that get a DUI saying it was the bartenders fault for giving them the alcohol or the brand of alcohol for creating it (they obviously knew the final result would be this DUI which was their plot all along D: )
|
Posted By: The_Dude
Date Posted: 27 Oct 2012 at 07:23
Well, my joke obviously failed. The"him" was Lion as if I were God saying I had not spoken to Lion. But if I have to explain it then it ain't funny. 
Credit for tryin'? 
|
Posted By: cthulhu
Date Posted: 27 Oct 2012 at 08:37
|
Topic originator = sunstorm i suspect (edit: a player too cowardly too stand with his alliance and too cowardly to openly criticise his own alliance without the fear that he would be punished. Hence this new account of his without all the flamboyant colors.)
------------- ^{;,,;}^ = cthulhua
|
Posted By: Southern Dwarf
Date Posted: 27 Oct 2012 at 10:16
cthulhu wrote:
Topic originator = sunstorm i suspect(edit: a player too cowardly too stand with his alliance and too cowardly to openly criticise his own alliance without the fear that he would be punished. Hence this new account of his without all the flamboyant colors.) | Really? Name calling without facts is as reliable as what the onposter did . . .
I don't like SunStorm at all since I suspect him as a critical element to escalate many insignificant conflicts but that does give neither me not anyone else the reason to badmouth him because a somewhat unidentified entity makes suspicious posts on the forum.
------------- Also known as Afaslizo ingame.
|
Posted By: GM Luna
Date Posted: 27 Oct 2012 at 16:13
This whole topic was dubious to begin with. But the blatant insults and name calling really aren't welcome. Closing this down.
Luna
------------- GM Luna | Illyriad Community Manager | community@illyriad.co.uk
|
|