Harmless? [H?] declares war on Absaroke [Absa]
Printed From: Illyriad
Category: The World
Forum Name: Politics & Diplomacy
Forum Description: If you run an alliance on Elgea, here's where you should make your intentions public.
URL: http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=4321
Printed Date: 17 Apr 2022 at 05:17 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Harmless? [H?] declares war on Absaroke [Absa]
Posted By: Ander
Subject: Harmless? [H?] declares war on Absaroke [Absa]
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 07:59
|
[13 Oct 03:21]<System> ** News flash: Harmless? [H?] declares war on Absaroke [Absa] Hostilities may begin immediately...
Make what you will out of it. 
|
Replies:
Posted By: Ander
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 08:09
|
There is this group in the classroom, who likes to put other children in the dustbin. Some children resist and kick when being carried away, and this is aggression and the group resents it. There is this girl in the class who tells these children that it is only a game, and they need to lighten up. There are those among the gang who constantly remind other children that being put in dustbin occasionally is no reason to stop coming to class - class is for fun.
And there are also some in the class who believe that the gang is doing this as a favour to them, it's all about somebody pasting bubblegum under their bench a long time ago.. And some more, who thinks that it wont happen to them since they don't chew bubble gum.
|
Posted By: Llyorn Of Jaensch
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 08:15
Harmless promises to not siege the person who can come up with the most ridiculous metaphor/analogy imaginable.
Attempts so far have been impressive.
------------- "ouch...best of luck." HonoredMule
|
Posted By: Magnificence
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 10:33
|
H is Monty Pythons Flying Circus, no, Dads Army! and Consone is the BBC when they sent the production team notification that the show is being cancelled, indefinitely, due to a complete lack of interest in the dated and some what musty attempts at humour.
|
Posted By: Mr Damage
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 10:36
|
Clever Mag!! C'mon LOJ you must like that one, put Mag on the non-sieging list.
|
Posted By: LordOfTheSwamp
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 10:41
|
Ander's analogy is actually very good. But it's simpler than that.
There is a disagreement playing out between those who believe that morality and justice are important in Illy, and those who think it's fun to kick people around.
I have an unpleasant feeling that the overwhelming majority will be....
Those who say that morality and justice are important in Illy but won't put themselves on the line to defend that, and will then bleat like (in Grego's phrase) sheep when Illy isn't the friendly, welcoming, supportive place that they thought it was.
------------- "A boy is building sandcastles on a beach. You go and kick down his castle. You could say that it only reflects how you play with sandcastles. Others may think it reflects who you are." - Ander.
|
Posted By: Mr Damage
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 10:57
|
We dont need another thread about who is right and wrong, everyone has an opinion, many will be affected by this war (we need a name for it) but Illy will go on, best of luck and lets keep the humour up but not the personal insults.
|
Posted By: Juswin
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 11:02
How about a thread naming the war?
------------- It may be that you are right. Then again, you may be wrong.
http://elgea.illyriad.co.uk/a/p/57903" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Ander
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 11:03
|
You are funny Mag!
Those of us who live as free men in real life do not come to Illy to have a submissive life in a fantasy world.
If fighting alongside my friends in Invictus, Kurdruk, Hathaldir and Turgor is the last thing I do in this game, my years worth of investment was well worth it. See you all out there!
For those who says that morality and justice are 'somewhat' important, enjoy your grass :D
|
Posted By: Mogul
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 11:09
|
Can i rename my http://i47.tinypic.com/fdrcpc.png" rel="nofollow - "propaganda comics" to history book now? ****mod edit****
Do you know what is new definition of cowardliness? When biggest alliance attacks 2nd biggest in middle of tournament.
|
Posted By: hellion19
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 12:50
Mogul wrote:
Can i rename my http://i47.tinypic.com/fdrcpc.png" rel="nofollow - "propaganda comics" to history book now?
Do you know what is new definition of cowardliness? When biggest alliance attacks 2nd biggest in middle of tournament.
|
Lets say that is true I just wanted to pose another question. What would you call 2nd attacking 8th in a tournament?
|
Posted By: The_Dragon
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 12:51
LordOfTheSwamp wrote:
Ander's analogy is actually very good. But it's simpler than that.
There is a disagreement playing out between those who believe that morality and justice are important in Illy, and those who think it's fun to kick people around.
I have an unpleasant feeling that the overwhelming majority will be....
Those who say that morality and justice are important in Illy but won't put themselves on the line to defend that, and will then bleat like (in Grego's phrase) sheep when Illy isn't the friendly, welcoming, supportive place that they thought it was. |
Someone who has high morality should consider his friend/alliance member's town/life as higher priority than tournament. I can't understand how someone with high morality still sacrifice his soldiers in tournament while his friend's towns are in danger.
|
Posted By: Rill
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 12:53
hellion19 wrote:
Mogul wrote:
Can i rename my http://i47.tinypic.com/fdrcpc.png" rel="nofollow - "propaganda comics" to history book now?
Do you know what is new definition of cowardliness? When biggest alliance attacks 2nd biggest in middle of tournament.
|
Lets say that is true I just wanted to pose another question. What would you call 2nd attacking 8th in a tournament?
|
good, clean fun?
|
Posted By: dunnoob
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 13:15
hellion19 wrote:
Mogul wrote:
Do you know what is new definition of cowardliness?When biggest alliance attacks 2nd biggest in middle of tournament. | Lets say that is true I just wanted to pose another question. What would you call 2nd attacking 8th in a tournament? | Mogul created this nice map overview of the three biggest confederations... When I count all resource camping problems I ever had since trade v2, I end up with farmers nil, crows nil, consone some limited to [off topic].
|
Posted By: Angrim
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 13:20
LordOfTheSwamp wrote:
There is a disagreement playing out between those who believe that morality and justice are important in Illy, and those who think it's fun to kick people around.
Those who say that morality and justice are important in Illy but won't put themselves on the line to defend that, and will then bleat like (in Grego's phrase) sheep when Illy isn't the friendly, welcoming, supportive place that they thought it was. |
as a neutral in the conflict, i thought i might register that neither peace nor any side is helped by a blanket insult issued to everyone who is not fighting for the side you favour.
i have for almost a year had a note on my profile that "Everything Kurdruk says is worth reading." evidently i need to update it to say "Everything less the namecalling and baseless characterisations..." have an opinion if you like, but please do not presume to tell me why i am not involved.
|
Posted By: Mogul
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 13:22
hellion19 wrote:
Lets say that is true I just wanted to pose another question. What would you call 2nd attacking 8th in a tournament?
|
Manual for Consone players to better understand RHY, H?, DLord or NC forum posts:
1. When they say: "alliance ABC is attacking alliance XYZ" they mean: "alliance ABC is self defending own towns by attacking XYZ siege camps"
2. When they say: "alliance ABC made unprovoked attack on alliance XYZ" they mean: "alliance ABC is helping their confed alliance to break XYZ siege camps"
3. When they say: "We are helping our friends in XYZ alliance" they mean: "We are sieging ABC alliance"
|
Posted By: Rill
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 13:24
|
I thought we were not involved because we want to save our ass... err, donkeys, donkeys for the new players?
No one ever tells me anything.
|
Posted By: LordOfTheSwamp
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 13:28
The_Dragon wrote:
Someone who has high morality should consider his friend/alliance member's town/life as higher priority than tournament. I can't understand how someone with high morality still sacrifice his soldiers in tournament while his friend's towns are in danger. |
Yeah, I agree.
Frost ceased tournament involvement as soon as Absa were attacked. I still have one army marching (I think it was a 13d march originally), and one that was on a 7d march which hit recently, but I hope no new tournament armies were dispatched by Frost since RHY declared war.
I *hope* other Consone members took similar steps. If they didn't perhaps they just underestimated the threat that RHY/H? posed. [shrug] It would be understandable - everyone talks all the time about what a friendly place Illy is - if you hear that all the time then presumably you find it hard to believe that something like this would happen.
------------- "A boy is building sandcastles on a beach. You go and kick down his castle. You could say that it only reflects how you play with sandcastles. Others may think it reflects who you are." - Ander.
|
Posted By: LordOfTheSwamp
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 13:40
Angrim wrote:
LordOfTheSwamp wrote:
There is a disagreement playing out between those who believe that morality and justice are important in Illy, and those who think it's fun to kick people around.
Those who say that morality and justice are important in Illy but won't put themselves on the line to defend that, and will then bleat like (in Grego's phrase) sheep when Illy isn't the friendly, welcoming, supportive place that they thought it was. |
as a neutral in the conflict, i thought i might register that neither peace nor any side is helped by a blanket insult issued to everyone who is not fighting for the side you favour. |
I am fighting in favour of morality and justice being important in Illy. H? have made it clear that they believe they have the right to attack people when it suits them - see KP's "the game gives me a catapult so I have the right to use it" argument, for one of many examples.
If you believe morality and justice being important in Illy, then you are not neutral - you are on my side. But if that is the case then it is reasonable that I ask why you aren't actually acting in this to defend the victims in this aggression - Absa and VIC.
If you have no opinion on whether morality and justice are important, then you are, as you say, a neutral party, and so I am not insulting you or calling you names, as you are not in any of the 3 groups I describe above.
But if you want morality and justice being important in Illy, and you do nothing to defend that, and then you whine in future, then it is absolutely fair that I call you out for that.
Up to you whether, as the saying goes, "the boot fits."
------------- "A boy is building sandcastles on a beach. You go and kick down his castle. You could say that it only reflects how you play with sandcastles. Others may think it reflects who you are." - Ander.
|
Posted By: hellion19
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 13:42
Mogul wrote:
hellion19 wrote:
Lets say that is true I just wanted to pose another question. What would you call 2nd attacking 8th in a tournament?
|
Manual for Consone players to better understand RHY, H?, DLord or NC forum posts:
1. When they say: "alliance ABC is attacking alliance XYZ" they mean: "alliance ABC is self defending own towns by attacking XYZ siege camps"
2. When they say: "alliance ABC made unprovoked attack on alliance XYZ" they mean: "alliance ABC is helping their confed alliance to break XYZ siege camps"
3. When they say: "We are helping our friends in XYZ alliance" they mean: "We are sieging ABC alliance"
|
I suppose the question was difficult to answer. I felt it was simply enough but I have been wrong more times than I can count.
Also from what I can see it looks like it is a fight between ABSA/VIC and H?/RHY and Consone is not really a factor currently. Otherwise you wouldn't of stated that alliance 1 is attacking alliance 2. Rather you would probably of stated that H? and Consone is fighting which seems to not be the case. Instead you made a poor attempt at turning my statement into just playing with my wording when it was a pretty simple question.
So to sum up what you state its fine for the 8th alliance to be hit by the 2nd alliance but the 1st can't hit the 2nd? You could go with the fact that at least H? and RHY declared war and went with it while others simply just started hitting people without any formal declaration.
Mostly just saying one should hold themselves to the same standard that they want to push on others. Anything short is a certain level of hypocrisy.
|
Posted By: Sisren
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 14:02
LordOfTheSwamp wrote:
Angrim wrote:
LordOfTheSwamp wrote:
There is a disagreement playing out between those who believe that morality and justice are important in Illy, and those who think it's fun to kick people around.
Those who say that morality and justice are important in Illy but won't put themselves on the line to defend that, and will then bleat like (in Grego's phrase) sheep when Illy isn't the friendly, welcoming, supportive place that they thought it was. |
as a neutral in the conflict, i thought i might register that neither peace nor any side is helped by a blanket insult issued to everyone who is not fighting for the side you favour. |
I am fighting in favour of morality and justice being important in Illy. H? have made it clear that they believe they have the right to attack people when it suits them - see KP's "the game gives me a catapult so I have the right to use it" argument, for one of many examples.
If you believe morality and justice being important in Illy, then you are not neutral - you are on my side. But if that is the case then it is reasonable that I ask why you aren't actually acting in this to defend the victims in this aggression - Absa and VIC.
If you have no opinion on whether morality and justice are important, then you are, as you say, a neutral party, and so I am not insulting you or calling you names, as you are not in any of the 3 groups I describe above.
But if you want morality and justice being important in Illy, and you do nothing to defend that, and then you whine in future, then it is absolutely fair that I call you out for that.
Up to you whether, as the saying goes, "the boot fits." |
The logical fallacy here is that you assume there are only 3 sides... Also, your definition of justice may or may not align with how others would view it. As for morality, the only moral thing to do in a game such as this is 'what keeps me alive'. That is the only right and proper thing to do after all.
------------- Illy is different from Physics- Reactions are rarely Equal, and rarely the opposite of what you'd expect...
|
Posted By: Mogul
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 14:07
|
That post was for consone players to understand your question.
using point 2 from that manual:
You say: VIC is attacking RHY during tournament. I say: VIC is helping Absa to break RHY siege camps...
And to answer your question: Yes of course in my opinion it is absolutely correct that VIC is helping Absa to defend. I believe that is most important point in Consone agreement - defend each other against aggression.
|
Posted By: hellion19
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 14:25
Mogul wrote:
That post was for consone players to understand your question.
using point 2 from that manual:
You say: VIC is attacking RHY during tournament. I say: VIC is helping Absa to break RHY siege camps...
And to answer your question: Yes of course in my opinion it is absolutely correct that VIC is helping Absa to defend. I believe that is most important point in Consone agreement - defend each other against aggression.
|
From my understanding of it being that it hasn't been fought a great deal is that there had been a deal more or less completed and pretty sure that Absa ended up being the aggressor after the fact.
Which hasn't really been argued but rather people complain more so about the reaction to said aggression. Start a fight... start to get your towns siege'd... cry foul and ask a larger alliance to help then cry foul again when another alliance steps in larger than your friend. Remember it all was fine upto the point H? and was not considered unfair (Absa/ShB/VIC vs RHY) but after RHY had help now RHY and H? are the bad guys.
I fully understand the main purpose you have here is propaganda with your pics being proof of it. Problem is that its kind of a poor attempt at it :/
|
Posted By: Ossian
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 14:58
|
It does seem at this point that a war of some sort is inevitable. However , I personally feel that , to prosecute an exaggerated conflict, starting from a minor "friction" over the resources on two mines, is a sad refelction on the inability of some players in H?/Dlord to fail to accept the changes that Tv2 brought to the game of Illy.
No matter how H? leaders twist and turn to justify their irrational aggression to the community , they cannot, by any stretch of the imagination compare Absa with "White" or the "Tubana faction of MK" and those who insist on removing Absa cities from Keppen are only doing so because they are stuck in the past of the "old Illyriad".
The game has moved on from the old "Siege, Grabbit and LOL" mentality that we have seen in the forums over the last two days. Those who want to prosecute this war simply because they want to stay "top dog" or just want to "siege cos its fun" are doing the community a diservice because it is plain that community doesn't want this. Many also accept that Absa don't deserve this.
Elsewhere Angrim of mCrow, wrote, that if you want peace "you have to work for it". H? are now indicating that their armies may attack and siege irregardless of whether RHY and Absa settle this or not. So it seems that if the community wants peace now it is going to have to fight for it!
|
Posted By: Mogul
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 15:07
hellion19 wrote:
From my understanding of it being that it hasn't been fought a great deal is that there had been a deal more or less completed and pretty sure that Absa ended up being the aggressor after the fact.
|
Discussions who was the first aggressor are on 35 pages in that other thread... you can find there many people that are pretty sure it was RHY and many pretty sure it was Absa.
hellion19 wrote:
Remember it all was fine upto the point H? and was not considered unfair (Absa/ShB/VIC vs RHY) but after RHY had help now RHY and H? are the bad guys. |
No I don't remember that. Nothing was fine. For me and I guess everyone in Consone, RHY are the bad guys since beginning of this conflict.
|
Posted By: The_Dude
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 15:11
Ossian wrote:
*****
No matter how H? leaders twist and turn to justify their irrational aggression to the community , they cannot, by any stretch of the imagination compare Absa with "White" or the "Tubana faction of MK" and those who insist on removing Absa cities from Keppen are only doing so because they are stuck in the past of the "old Illyriad".
***** |
OK, Bringing up Tubana and MK involves ME. There was never a "Tubana faction of MK." There was MK and there was Tubana. Tubana was the ONLY MK player that lost cities in the MK - H?/Dlords & Coalition conflict.
Them's the facts, Jax.
|
Posted By: dunnoob
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 15:41
Ossian wrote:
http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/harmless-h-declares-war-on-absaroke-absa_topic4321_post55689.html#55689" rel="nofollow - It does seem at this point that a war of some sort is inevitable. |
Ossian wrote:
http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/rhyagelle-responds-to-absaroke-aggression_topic4306_post55687.html#55687" rel="nofollow - It does seem at this point that a war of some sort is inevitable http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/harmless-h-declares-war-on-absaroke-absa_topic4321_post55689.html#55689" rel="nofollow - . |
You forgot to post this message in more related threads.
|
Posted By: belargyle
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 18:27
Ossian wrote:
It does seem at this point that a war of some sort is inevitable. However , I personally feel that , to prosecute an exaggerated conflict, starting from a minor "friction" over the resources on two mines, is a sad refelction on the inability of some players in H?/Dlord to fail to accept the changes that Tv2 brought to the game of Illy. |
Ignorance can be a fine thing, just please don't go trying to hand out buckets of it to the rest of us. Keep it to yourself.
Please show in your vast knowledge of information where Dlord has entered this conflict at all. None you say? - ignorance confirmed.
Additionally, the game isn't going to go changing into Castleville or Farmville as some desire, It will always be, in part, a war game and T2 has helped to establish this point, and is in fact the one of the very reasons the Devs wanted it in place (increased friction). Seems others need to move with where the game trying to get back to, and what the Devs are, in part, looking for.
|
Posted By: Rill
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 18:37
|
Suggesting that the devs want us to play in their sandbox in one way or another way is a fairly common occurrence. I have heard the devs repeatedly say that they don't have any preconceptions about how we should interact with the sandbox and that they are charmed and delighted by the "castles" we create here.
If people have ideas about what should or shouldn't be or how things should or shouldn't be done, advocate for them vigorously! But using "the devs want it" as a crutch for one's ideas is not particularly convincing.
|
Posted By: Brids17
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 18:42
Ander wrote:
Those of us who live as free men in real life do not come to Illy to have a submissive life in a fantasy world. |
See, when you put it that way, it actually sounds pretty good.
-------------
|
Posted By: Kumomoto
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 19:32
Brids17 wrote:
Ander wrote:
Those of us who live as free men in real life do not come to Illy to have a submissive life in a fantasy world. |
See, when you put it that way, it actually sounds pretty good. |
Lmao!
|
Posted By: Sisren
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 19:50
Rill wrote:
Suggesting that the devs want us to play in their sandbox in one way or another way is a fairly common occurrence. I have heard the devs repeatedly say that they don't have any preconceptions about how we should interact with the sandbox and that they are charmed and delighted by the "castles" we create here.
If people have ideas about what should or shouldn't be or how things should or shouldn't be done, advocate for them vigorously! But using "the devs want it" as a crutch for one's ideas is not particularly convincing. |
Except where the devs state '...the devs want this...'
------------- Illy is different from Physics- Reactions are rarely Equal, and rarely the opposite of what you'd expect...
|
Posted By: Rill
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 20:04
|
The devs are pretty good at expressing support for pretty much any way players choose to engage with the game, leading many to think that the devs agree with "their" way of playing. Dang, those guys should run for office!
|
Posted By: Garth
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 20:16
Rill wrote:
The devs are pretty good at expressing support for pretty much any way players choose to engage with the game, leading many to think that the devs agree with "their" way of playing. Dang, those guys should run for office! | You'd almost think someone in a place of certain importance among the Dev team had some familiarity with International Diplomacy
|
Posted By: Daufer
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 21:42
Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote:
Harmless promises to not siege the person who can come up with the most ridiculous metaphor/analogy imaginable.
Attempts so far have been impressive.
|
I just saw this and I can't resist:
H? is a military alliance in a game where military action is regarded with abhorrence and terror. Sure there is trading, manufacturing and killing wildlife, but if you base your reputation on military supremacy and you don't get to fight once in a while, what's the point of logging in? Building all those muscles must feel pretty meaningless if you don't get to flex them.
Harmless? is like Rowdy Roddy Piper in the movie "They Live". They have come here to chew bubblegum and to kick a$$. They are all out of bubblegum.
Can I be on the no-siege list?
|
Posted By: Rill
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 21:46
Posted By: ES2
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 21:57
And the misguided hate against H? flourish's..
------------- Eternal Fire
|
Posted By: Rill
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 22:08
|
/me thinks about explaining the joke to EF /me decides to believe he was being ironical
|
Posted By: Llyorn Of Jaensch
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 22:55
List.
Daufer. Ander.
------------- "ouch...best of luck." HonoredMule
|
Posted By: Sisren
Date Posted: 13 Oct 2012 at 23:10
Daufer wrote:
Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote:
Harmless promises to not siege the person who can come up with the most ridiculous metaphor/analogy imaginable.
Attempts so far have been impressive.
|
I just saw this and I can't resist:
H? is a military alliance in a game where military action is regarded with abhorrence and terror. Sure there is trading, manufacturing and killing wildlife, but if you base your reputation on military supremacy and you don't get to fight once in a while, what's the point of logging in? Building all those muscles must feel pretty meaningless if you don't get to flex them.
Harmless? is like Rowdy Roddy Piper in the movie "They Live". They have come here to chew bubblegum and to kick a$$. They are all out of bubblegum.
Can I be on the no-siege list? |
I think it is more like this - Harmless' military reputation is like in the book the Wonderful Wizard of Oz - Oz the Powerful and Terrible is actually a 'Humbug' who has fooled everyone into thinking they are powerful, so much so that no one actually sees them anymore, and no one disturbs them for fear of their power (which is not actual power, jsut stage props and ventrilloquism).
Does that put me on the list too? I didn't mean nothin by it, honest!
------------- Illy is different from Physics- Reactions are rarely Equal, and rarely the opposite of what you'd expect...
|
Posted By: Kompanion
Date Posted: 12 Nov 2013 at 23:47
Sisren wrote:
I think it is more like this - Harmless' military reputation is like in the book the Wonderful Wizard of Oz - Oz the Powerful and Terrible is actually a 'Humbug' who has fooled everyone into thinking they are powerful, so much so that no one actually sees them anymore, and no one disturbs them for fear of their power (which is not actual power, jsut stage props and ventrilloquism).
Does that put me on the list too? I didn't mean nothin by it, honest! |
What happened during the consone war was in the past. We are in the present. I am not sure why people want to rehash things.
I hope Sisren was right, but somehow I have my doubts.
|
Posted By: jcx
Date Posted: 13 Nov 2013 at 04:28
Good work, lesser war stuff like name-calling, insults, etc...
we are going CIVIL now. (Not rude; marked by satisfactory (or especially minimal) adherence to social usages and sufficient but not noteworthy consideration for others. )
Great work Guys and may the force be with you all.
keep it up!
|
|