KT vs. =EoQ=
Printed From: Illyriad
Category: The World
Forum Name: Politics & Diplomacy
Forum Description: If you run an alliance on Elgea, here's where you should make your intentions public.
URL: http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=2148
Printed Date: 17 Apr 2022 at 05:12
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: KT vs. =EoQ=
Posted By: Baughb
Subject: KT vs. =EoQ=
Date Posted: 10 Jul 2011 at 03:03
|
It has come to my attention that Clavicus is claiming we had an agreement to only fight each other. This is total nonsense. I have never made any such agreement and I have proof that Clavicus knows this. He had a letter sent to my alliance saying that he was attacking StJude and myself with multiple members of his alliance. Thier end game is to rid Illy of the two of us. Several players have already joined in a failed attempt to siege KT. This puts a lie to any such claims that this was a one on one affair. To any and all EoQ members, if you want out of this war, leave EoQ. Your leader dragged you into this without taking into account the consequences of such an action as declareing war on KT. We have no axe to grind with you. We will however, attack what we see as a threat. All who stay with EoQ are legitimate targets. |
Replies:
Posted By: Gemley
Date Posted: 10 Jul 2011 at 03:09
|
I'm just going to sit back and watch the fireworks ------------- �I do not love the bright sword for it's sharpness, nor the arrow for it's swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend� - J.R.R. Tolkien |
Posted By: Kurfist
Date Posted: 10 Jul 2011 at 03:10
|
Well at least you remembered to put the "=" at the beginning and end, I can not tell you how many times people forgot the two equal signs, I mean come on its not that hard. But back to the topic, that declaration was made in global which at my local time would have been about two days ago, give or take an hour. How kind of you to tell my members in this here topic that they could avoid being targeted, after you and your good friend jude sent some attacks to law ranked members, bravo. That sounds familiar. It's also very macho of you to ENCOURAGE your newbie members to take up arms against me and my alliance, having a 160 population player send 50 swordsman at me? tsk tsk In short I have no respect for you, whereas i have a tiny bit more for jude. He at least picked a side that would be a challenge, whereas you baited me and my alliance into this war, and got into a war with havoc over an old grudge. Bravo sir. ------------- Patience is a virtue, resource giving is a sin |
Posted By: Brids17
Date Posted: 10 Jul 2011 at 03:33
|
It amazes me that so many low pop new players are capable of starting so much trouble...
-------------  |
Posted By: Gemley
Date Posted: 10 Jul 2011 at 03:35
eats pancakes while watching the many newbie wars in illyriad ------------- �I do not love the bright sword for it's sharpness, nor the arrow for it's swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend� - J.R.R. Tolkien |
Brids17 wrote:Posted By: Baughb
Date Posted: 10 Jul 2011 at 03:59
|
and of course you have a copy of this conversation? no? didnt think so. you want to know why? cause it never happened. just out of morbid curiosity, what was this "agreement"?
|
Posted By: Baughb
Date Posted: 10 Jul 2011 at 04:08
| also, the low ranked people we attacked have 2000 - 4000 pop. as big as CV or bigger, so are we to not attack anyone at all? do you understand the concept of war? we dont have to wait for you to attack us, we can go on the offensive and we have. |
Posted By: Kurfist
Date Posted: 10 Jul 2011 at 04:40
|
i have to admit, i made the agreement and didnt copy the log because i thought youd stick to your word , obviously not. the agreement was to have the leadership of both parties be the sole targets, which is obviously not the case anymore.
------------- Patience is a virtue, resource giving is a sin |
Posted By: Baughb
Date Posted: 10 Jul 2011 at 05:38
|
then were you lying when you said the following which was sent to Gaia, because you said you did copy the chat logs here > RE: RE: RE: RE: Hey :S i have the chatlog in my inbox somewhere, it was made on global a few days ago. <.< > RE: RE: RE: Hey :S I think it's ended.. Sorry to be a pain in your arse > RE: RE: Hey :S when this idiotic conversation ends. > RE: Hey :S Not that I doubt your word but may I please have the terms of engagement and the report of the fight that broke those rules#?
|
||||
Posted By: StJude
Date Posted: 10 Jul 2011 at 06:26
This is hearsay and rumor until you produce documentation proving otherwise. I distinctly remember asking you to post a conditions thread, you didn't. You did send some dumb roleplaying IGM saying to our members you were only after their leaders and they would receive compensation. I think you can see from the blitzkrieg of attacks that our members reject your terms. Like true allies they have our backs. Their reply in short is "NUTS" KT is a true alliance of players, no one is being "used". All members are aware of the consequences and are willing participants of these shenanigans. |
Posted By: (EOM) Harry
Date Posted: 12 Jul 2011 at 19:27
|
MOAR! ------------- Fool's watch the land when the problem is in the heart. |
Posted By: StJude
Date Posted: 13 Jul 2011 at 00:43
NO U! |
Posted By: Kurfist
Date Posted: 13 Jul 2011 at 00:47
|
/me shrugs MOAR ------------- Patience is a virtue, resource giving is a sin |