MK sent no armies to this assault, though.  So I would not brag about it as some brilliant plan.

 

 

Ottar was still with the Dwarven Lords till AFTER the MK battle.

 

Bucknaked was nearest Ottar and a player who we only attacked to try to draw forces away and divided up through varied sieges on multiple players. We were ALREADY allied with Curse (then - WOTP) and the attack on Bucknaked was Dlords idea (specifically Ottars). We asked for aid from them on that front, to reinforce and/or siege also Bucknaked.

 

I believe he noted the real issue later on in his OP.. deep down he wanted to be leader of Wolves of the Plains.

 

Funny thing is Iduna did a great job at her leadership role by delegating resposibilities to others and not doing it all herself. You would have to be NUTZ to try to keep that up! She has the right also to appoint and promote anyone she desired for the good of the alliance and since I speak with Iduna often, I know that is her desire - the good of the alliance. It sounds like he started making waves and others were backlashing against him trying to excert authority. If one desires to have respect he must first earn it AND THEN maintain it.

 

I am not the strongest player here nor close (well not to close :)

However those whom I have placed in leadership within the Dwarven Lords, I do so to compensate for my short commings. Yet they are there because I trust them and they remain of their own desire because they trust me.  If trust lags then it is talked about. Ottar and I had a falling out about his playing style and desiring to wipe out anyone within 10 squares of him, newbie or not, allied or not. I would not allow this. Ottar stepped down from leadership because our views were different yet we both had much respect for the other even after his leaving. Ottar is a good example of a leader. When things were progressing in a manner that contradicted his desires he came to me and we discussed it, or I came to him. And he stepped out rather than continue in a stressed relationship that would most certainly have ended up as this did.

 

He/she should have left long ago but it seems from the post his/her desire to control and lead the Curse was a dream to good to let go, but when he/she did.. it was to late. To illustrate I'll quote a Kenny Rogers Country Song.. "You gotta know when to hold 'em, know when ta fold 'em. Know when to walk away, and know run..."

 

 

What is happening right now is the result of your own actions and behaviour.

Like I said before, others have left the alliance before you and they are doing just fine.

Try to reflect your comments about me onto yourself and maybe, just maybe, you will come to see that what we are doing now is for the best of both sides.

Actually, we are doing you a favour by removing you from the Curse cluster, into the corner of the map where you will be able to thrive and rebuild with a pretty advanced city.

 

At first I was very mellow by just reacting with some magic and diplo's and I was about to leave it at that, but after your display yesterday on GC that ship had sailed.

 

What is to say that you won't start acting like this again ?

This is not a first time occasion and you have just pushed it too far.

 

There is no going back anymore and I can tell you that I have full support from my alliance, no need for you to try and work on there loyalty towards Curse.

This also reflects how people feel about the way you have treated them on several occasions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Is a relocated city empowered with the Move City Spell like a new account?  Or is the relocated city fixed were it is relocated?

 

And, NO, this is not a request for someone to show me how it works.  A verbal explanation is all I want.  :):)

He mentioned this several times before, he was going to quit the game anyway.

I do realize that by him being active in the forum he is obviously still here.

The statement about us doing him a favour may have been incorrect and bold, I can imagine that this is not a favour at all.

The fact remains that recent and past events show us that we don't know what to expect from him. At some point one has to draw the line.

He started by sieging a curse member himself, inactive or not is not relevant.

He should have handled the situation with him leaving Curse a lot better and civilised.

He also should have realzied that by leaving us the way he did (disrespectfull is the least I have to say about that) and then sieging a Curse town, that he was in the middle of the Curse cluster.

He caused enough problems as it is and we have been very easy on him al along.

As he seems to change his mind often about leaving, not leaving, leaving the alliance, coming back in the alliance, leaving again, sieging our town, not sieging our town....well you get the point.

Who is to say he will not just start all over again in the future ?

We do not seek problems and are not very amused by the incorrect image that LH/DR is displaying here, once again, this is all due to his own poor decisions.

We are not basing this action on a one week event.

 

Frankly, if you are not receiving offers of assistance at this point, then you must now come to the conclusion that you have sealed your fate. 

 

At this point, your public displays are only providing the most sadistic pleasure possible (I'm guilty) to the Illy community.

 

Good luck.

 

To Llyorn?

 

LH, you got lot's of bridges to mend, cowboy.