Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Possibility this is a pay to win?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedPossibility this is a pay to win?
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 345
Author
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Darkwords View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 23 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1005 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Nov 2012 at 23:17
The fact is that EF clearly holds some kind of grudge against the CrowFed, and I beleive is merely using Brids to troll against the CrowFed as a whole in an attempt to try and drag us into a war that does not involve us.

This is after all pretty common behaviour for this player.

Its clear that in the past, EF has given Brids reason to hold a grudge against him and is now suffering for that.

I just cant comprehend how he would want to develop further grudges with us.

Originally posted by ES2 ES2 wrote:

I've made it my mission here in illy to kill your widdle federation what makes you think losing a few cities will deter that?

Best wishes Crow,




After making a statement such as above, its pretty thoughtless for an alliance 'leader' to just blank a request for an explaination.

As a leader he really should not make such threats without some fore-thought and consideration, this shows an utter carelessness toward every member of his alliance.  Why these men are willing to suffer for him I really do not know.
Back to Top
Gemley View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Location: Ralidor
Status: Offline
Points: 586 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Nov 2012 at 23:31
Originally posted by Darkwords Darkwords wrote:

Why these men are willing to suffer for him I really do not know.
Probably because the majority of his alliance members hate the Crow alliances as much as he does and are willing to sacrifice  as much as ATH is willing to sacrifice to get the job done.
�I do not love the bright sword for it's sharpness, nor the arrow for it's swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend� - J.R.R. Tolkien
Back to Top
Chaos Armor View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 07 Feb 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 213 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Nov 2012 at 23:40
SENSORS HAVE DETECTED DERAILED THREAD... RE-CALIBRATING...

If you are under the assumption that Illyriad is a pay-to-win then you reveal your ignorance. Illyriad has the possibility to become a pay-to-win but is kept from that fate by resource growth and blockades. Hypothetically you can withstand a siege forever. Realistically however blockades limit this. A city can not withstand fifty siege engines by using its own resources and prestige. It can however bring in resources through trade. When that happens then you need to use blockades. Therefore this is not a pay to win but rather, as TD said, "a pay to prolong losing".
Back to Top
Rill View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar
Player Council - Geographer

Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Nov 2012 at 00:07
Originally posted by Gemley Gemley wrote:

Originally posted by Darkwords Darkwords wrote:

Why these men are willing to suffer for him I really do not know.
Probably because the majority of his alliance members hate the Crow alliances as much as he does and are willing to sacrifice  as much as ATH is willing to sacrifice to get the job done.

Or it could be that they realize that Crows are by nature fairly peaceful and thus unlikely to retaliate. I would speculate that EF "hates" Crows because we are in fact fairly safe to hate, in the sense that we are difficult to offend and unlikely to take insults seriously.  Or at least many of us are.
Back to Top
Aurordan View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar
Player Council - Ambassador

Joined: 21 Sep 2011
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 982 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Nov 2012 at 00:40
Originally posted by Darkwords Darkwords wrote:



After making a statement such as above, its pretty thoughtless for an alliance 'leader' to just blank a request for an explaination.

As a leader he really should not make such threats without some fore-thought and consideration, this shows an utter carelessness toward every member of his alliance. 

There seems to be a lot of poor leadership floating around this war.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 345
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.