| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
Brids17 
Postmaster General
Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483
|
 Posted: 29 Nov 2012 at 18:42 |
 ES2 wrote:
Or maybe the fact that TLR is being harased and damaged more by a band of cowards then by Shade, and oh hey I've made it my mission here in illy to kill your widdle federation what makes you think losing a few cities will deter that?
Best wishes Crow,
|
Lol, her city was under the pop needed to raze it and you guys still let the siege army get destroyed. Yeah AtH, this game is *clearly* a pay to win. Good luck even killing a 100 pop crow newbie...
|
|
|
 |
ES2
Postmaster
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 550
|
Posted: 29 Nov 2012 at 19:48 |
That wasn't the point of this, though I had a doubt that unless someone spelled it out for you, a crow wouldnt understand.
Oh and hey we were about to kill that city but then Beecks popped up out of nowhere with seven thousand marshals, dont pride yourself on something you couldnt kill.
Edited by ES2 - 29 Nov 2012 at 19:50
|
|
Eternal Fire
|
|
Brids17
Postmaster General
Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483
|
Posted: 29 Nov 2012 at 20:04 |
ES2 wrote:
That wasn't the point of this, though I had a doubt that unless someone spelled it out for you, a crow wouldnt understand.
Oh and hey we were about to kill that city but then Beecks popped up out of nowhere with seven thousand marshals, dont pride yourself on something you couldnt kill. |
How many times to have to explain it to you? This game, the one we're playing right this very second, is not a pay to win, you're just bad a sieging people.
And in regards to the city, you only needed to drop it down to 4880 pop to raise it and yet you guys continued to bombard it all the way down to 1474 and let your siege get wiped out. So once again, you don't know how to construct and use a proper siege.
Edited by Brids17 - 29 Nov 2012 at 20:07
|
|
|
|
Darkwords
Postmaster General
Joined: 23 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1005
|
Posted: 29 Nov 2012 at 20:06 |
|
Perhaps there is something you dont understand?
Your alliance is not at war with the Crows, just someone that abandoned his place in the Crowfed.
However, if you keep attempting pathetic insults you will be held to account for it.
|
|
Brids17
Postmaster General
Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483
|
Posted: 29 Nov 2012 at 20:08 |
Darkwords wrote:
Your alliance is not at war with the Crows, just someone that abandoned his place in the Crowfed.
|
I didn't abandon my place. I am still very much a Rook of mCrow and part of the Crowilition leadership. I left temporarily to siege EF and help with the war.
Edited by Brids17 - 29 Nov 2012 at 20:09
|
|
|
|
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
|
Posted: 29 Nov 2012 at 21:45 |
|
It is nevertheless true that Crows are not involved in the current conflict between Shade and TLR. If EF wishes to bring Crow down, he will have to choose a different war in which to do it.
|
|
Aurordan
Postmaster
Player Council - Ambassador
Joined: 21 Sep 2011
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 982
|
Posted: 29 Nov 2012 at 21:52 |
Rill wrote:
It is nevertheless true that Crows are not involved in the current conflict between Shade and TLR. If EF wishes to bring Crow down, he will have to choose a different war in which to do it. |
Except for the Rooks which have joined Shade with the express intention of razing TLR town. Otherwise, no involvement at all.
|
|
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
|
Posted: 29 Nov 2012 at 21:59 |
|
Rooks plural? It is true that Brids has joined Shade for reasons of his own, but please don't exaggerate the situation.
|
|
Brids17
Postmaster General
Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483
|
Posted: 29 Nov 2012 at 22:30 |
Aurordan wrote:
Except for the Rooks which have joined Shade with the express intention of razing TLR town. Otherwise, no involvement at all.
|
If the Crowilition was involved we would have declared war. We didn't. I left and joined separately. There's a big difference.
|
|
|
|
Aurordan
Postmaster
Player Council - Ambassador
Joined: 21 Sep 2011
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 982
|
Posted: 29 Nov 2012 at 22:57 |
Brids17 wrote:
I am still very much a Rook of mCrow and part of the Crowilition leadership. I left temporarily to siege EF and help with the war. |
No, he has not left. He has, while continuing to serve in the highest position of Crow's leadership, joined a belligerent alliance for the express purpose of fighting. You can say it's a lesser involvement the coming out and having the whole confederation declare war, but you are far from uninvolved.
|
|
Tweet
Possibility this is a pay to win?