Political Limits |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
eowan the short
Postmaster
Joined: 03 Jan 2016 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 937 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Political LimitsPosted: 05 Apr 2018 at 13:15 |
|
Should there be a limit to the number of NAPs and Confeds to try to promote actual political strategy rather than just being friends with everyone?
#BlameMyr
|
|
![]() |
|
Ten Kulch
Postmaster
Joined: 20 Jan 2017 Location: Fellandire Status: Offline Points: 678 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 Apr 2018 at 14:33 |
|
Since NAPs and confeds can be broken with a click, they mean very little. At least from the system perspective. The relationship is more important. Some of the most valuable agreements in the game are secret, and exist without the little system tags.
The same is true of war. |
|
|
Check out my blog, Warmongering in Illyriad for self-defense techniques, military city construction, and PvP strategies.
|
|
![]() |
|
Bill Cipher
Wordsmith
Joined: 28 Mar 2016 Location: The Universe Status: Offline Points: 180 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 Apr 2018 at 14:50 |
|
I don't see the need for a limit with them as Ten mentioned they mean little anyways.
and Eeo are u blaming everyone for something and am i next? :P
|
|
|
d-a-r-o-r-w-o pb wlph kdv frph wr exuq. l lqyrnh wkh dqflhqw srzhu wkdw l pdb uhwxuq
|
|
![]() |
|
eowan the short
Postmaster
Joined: 03 Jan 2016 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 937 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 Apr 2018 at 14:53 |
|
Oh, there was a discussion in GC about this sort of thing and I figured I might as well make some polls. The #Blames are just who said them
|
|
![]() |
|
Hyde
Greenhorn
Joined: 19 Dec 2017 Status: Offline Points: 70 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 Apr 2018 at 20:37 |
|
If NAPs or Confeds had set amoumt of times that they had to last for, they would be more strategically important. But then there's the case of how long - 3 weeks so you have to refresh the NAP or Confed and keep in touch with allies would provide interesting.
|
|
![]() |
|
abstractdream
Postmaster General
Joined: 02 Oct 2011 Location: Oarnamly Status: Offline Points: 1857 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 Apr 2018 at 21:42 |
|
I agree with TK. The in-game political system is simply window dressing. I would so like to see a real and robust attempt at an in-game political system. Some general examples off the top of my head are; criteria for offering and/or accepting NAPs and Confeds, requirements and benefits for maintaining them, penalties for unilaterally breaking them. I'd also like to see the same sorts of things for declarations of war and offers of peace.
Oh, and Pathfinding. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |