Darkwords wrote:
In what way am I discrediting Lorre or PA here, the only reason we have mentioned Lorre is that YOU brought him up.
I am merely asking why PA have A) not elected a new leader... and B) if they are unable to do so, why not reform as a new alliance.
I am not out to put them down, just asking legitimate questions, which you for some unknown reason seem to take offence at.
If you knew the History of the VALAR and how our alliance came into existance you would realise that what I am proposing is actually good advice in my eyes.
We reformed from an alliance and due to the fact that we had a new alliance which only included active players, we grew to a great strength so quickly that it shocked us.
|
Your first response was not a request for information, nor was it to reform under a new banner:
When an alliance leader gives up on the game without electing a new leader, shouldn't the alliance members look elsewhere?
Only when others started to express their support in PA did you deem it necessary to clarify. You further seem to be taking the support of PA to preclude the changing of their name, or reforming under a new alliance.
"The fact that they could all on mass move to a new alliance which they would have full control over, makes the choice to remain look either very stupid, or very suspicious."
To which I responded bringing up Lorre for the first time:
Lorre has been gone less then a week.
...
I see nothing stupid or suspicious with regards to giving the current members and leadership time to resolve their internal issues over a course suggesting to flee like rats from a sinking ship.
In fact, I find the course of action on you are suggesting premature and the more suspicious.
---That is when your Alliance leader posted:
PA will never be the same without Lorre. Lorre was a great leader but i would like to make it known that he led a campaign of hate and bad propaganda against the Valar. With Lorre gone, and I hope FOREVER, i am personally looking forward to more harmonious relationships with PA or whatever its members decide it will or has to become and I will wish the new leadership success in its endeavours.
If Lorre comes back, then sad to say, nothing will have changed.
Which you have failed to recognize the following part:
whatever its members decide it will or has to become and I will wish the new leadership success in its endeavours.
Finally, I will now return to the Berberos affair to show you that you are every bit as guilty as you have been proclaiming Lorre to have been... Coming to Global for answers because IGM go unanswered and then not giving PA time to resolve their issues. I will also add that my interpretation based on your word choice suggests an attempt to discredit the membership of PA.