Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Non-Aligned Alliance Movement
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedNon-Aligned Alliance Movement

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 567
Author
Rill View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar
Player Council - Geographer

Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Oct 2012 at 13:57
Originally posted by Brids17 Brids17 wrote:

Originally posted by Rill Rill wrote:

To save armies for the conflicts that are not possible to solve peacefully.

What are the odds of a multiple conflicts happening so closely together that a player would not be able to rebuild their army before the next conflict arose? 

If people stopped trying to solve most conflicts peacefully, pretty darn good.
Back to Top
Brids17 View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Oct 2012 at 07:58
Originally posted by Rill Rill wrote:

To save armies for the conflicts that are not possible to solve peacefully.

What are the odds of a multiple conflicts happening so closely together that a player would not be able to rebuild their army before the next conflict arose? 
Back to Top
Rill View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar
Player Council - Geographer

Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Oct 2012 at 06:41
Originally posted by Brids17 Brids17 wrote:

Originally posted by Janosch Janosch wrote:

Internal and external conflicts should be solved peaceful (if possible).

Why?

To save armies for the conflicts that are not possible to solve peacefully.
Back to Top
Brids17 View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Oct 2012 at 06:22
Originally posted by Janosch Janosch wrote:

Internal and external conflicts should be solved peaceful (if possible).

Why?
Back to Top
Janosch View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 19 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Oct 2012 at 01:46
Silverlake from H? commented here: http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/larger-alliances-taking-advantage-of-smaller-ones_topic4153.html
Originally posted by <span style=font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14.545454025268555px; line-height: 16.363636016845703px;>Silverlake</span> Silverlake wrote:


I find it reprehensible that larger alliances are taking advantage of smaller alliances by harvesting resources from the smaller alliance's sov squares, attacking their camped armies, and not even following their own rules! If you say you are going to attack anyone camped or harvesting within 5 squares of your cities, but your members do this to others, that is the height of hypocrisy... shame of you!!!!

And Hadus replied:
Originally posted by <span style=font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14.545454025268555px; line-height: 16.363636016845703px;>Hadus</span> Hadus wrote:


Perhaps the smaller alliances could work together and craft their own confederation, in order to protect each other in the event larger alliances exert their power in an unbecoming manner.


There are other reasons why we think this is necessary. We would love to join any such organisation, if it would exist, but it is hard to bring “the small” alliances together (which have founded variouse small organisations). It is even hard to get an overview what all this alliances do. They do have various quarrels among themselves (who else should they fight against?) and eventually do not trust each other. Also given the poor ingame communication possibilities between alliances, it makes it hard to get people to know each other. So I propose to form the:

Non-Aligned Alliance Movement (NAAM)

We imagine a loose (and maybe sometimes closer) community of alliances with good intentions that aim to cooperate for the good of their alliances and all of Illyriad, without being pushed around by large alliances or annihilated for whatever reason. This would also avoid that small alliances need to run to this forum in order to get some help (which they might get or not). Internal and external conflicts should be solved peaceful (if possible). And finally there will be no force to participate in any decision that you do not support. We propose to agree on a declaration of intention which covers the following points:

1. Cooperate in peace;

2. Support in conflicts (if appropriate);

3. Form a large alliance (of large players) in the next tournament or for war effort; and

4. Be open to more members that like to see how a Non-Aligned Movement can work in Illyriad and extend the voluntary cooperation to areas our members are interested in.

We are not sure if this will work, but we would be happy to see it work. We are however sure we need to attract some more alliances to make this a meaningful movement. If you are interested, feel free to contact Gaia Nutella Tulips, Naxos or Janosch.

Now is the time to form the Non-Aligned Alliance Movement, join together to participate in the tournament and use the time to get to know each other.

Check out the public part of our trade policy: http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/trade-Event-creation-of-trade-alliance_topic4536.html

NOTE: This movement is not created to bully other alliances but to stand together against bullies.

Update: Link added.


Edited by Janosch - 05 Dec 2012 at 17:42
You like Democracy? Join the Old Republic!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 567
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.