Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Night Crusaders / STEEL conflict
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedNight Crusaders / STEEL conflict

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 7>
Author
Rasak View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith


Joined: 26 Nov 2011
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 140
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Sep 2012 at 07:45
That seems well said, but I think they choose to have issue Steel. Right or wrong they are doing exactly as you said. They are playing the game the way they want.  Who are you to tell them to change it to a different type of game cause you disagree? It seems to me they are playing the war game just as they have pictured it.
Back to Top
Salararius View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 26 Sep 2011
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 519
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Sep 2012 at 04:56
so, you made a bunch of anonymous attacks and then posted about it here because you were tired of all the talk, talk, talk and politics?

Wow, you guys really thought this out.  You're obviously thinking circles around the rest of us.  You owe Grim an apology because he could have turned this into a real political brewhaha if he had wanted to.

Here's a question though.  If you 10 are so bored and are looking for a real fight, why don't you divide into two teams of 5 and fight a real war?  At least then you would have a fight against worthy opponents.  Why fight someone you so clearly feel is inferior and why waste the forums time by telling us about it?  STEEL doesn't seem to care if you attack them, I don't care, others here don't care.  Go find a corner and play a war game if that is your wish.

I do not understand why the people that want to play a war game can't stop talking about it and just do it.  This "game" can be like 5 or 10 or 20 or ?? games.  You can play a wargame, other people can play cityville, others can play tradeville, others can play mysteryville, others can play a large MMOG.  If you want a war game, find someone else who also wants a war game like the one you want and start a war game.  If you want to tromp around like a bully though, well that's different.  If you want to be the self appointed Mrs. Manners of Illy, that's different too.  Some people might just object to either of those decisions and you're going to wade hip deep into a lot of talk, talk, talk and politics in either situation.

Back to Top
Garth View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 10 May 2012
Location: Somewhere, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 249
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Sep 2012 at 04:52
Originally posted by Octavianus Octavianus wrote:


Too late. New settlements of STEEL members have been dipo-attacked.

Since your statement here is in response to concern for newbs...
Just to clarify; do you mean new settlements of non-newbs being diplo'ed? That's how I read what you wrote. It's a lot different than "STEEL newbs are being diplo-attacked".
Back to Top
Sisren View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 03 Feb 2012
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 446
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Sep 2012 at 04:37
oh, I do see that now.  Huh, simple misreading can vary the results thusly.  :)
Back to Top
Aurordan View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar
Player Council - Ambassador

Joined: 21 Sep 2011
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 982
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Sep 2012 at 04:30
Originally posted by Sisren Sisren wrote:

Originally posted by Brids17 Brids17 wrote:

Originally posted by invictusa invictusa wrote:

I cant speak for my alliance, but there are those willing to help militarily or otherwise to defend the justification of cleansing the game of a mindset that diminishes the progress of Elgea.

Will look forward to the Steel + GC punks/trolls vs. NC + forward thinking players conflict

Are you actually suggesting that attacking someone diminishes the "progress" (What does that even mean?) of Elgea?

invictusa can correct me, but I believe they mean the undeclared war part of it.  If NC wanted to issue a fight, then they should have just issued it and not dance about the room ignoring the elephant.

The loss of progress being that we don't tend to wage undeclared wars in Illyriad, like in other games.

Huh.  I read it as him saying that STEEL (ans the punks/trolls) were diminishing the progress of the game, and that NC was forward thinking.  Same offer though.  

Incidentally, while methods of war declaration may vary in Illy, I don't think I've played any game where declarations are much less clear(and then only due to game mechanics), and several where declarations where much clearer and more eloquent.  
Back to Top
Sisren View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 03 Feb 2012
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 446
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Sep 2012 at 03:37
Originally posted by Brids17 Brids17 wrote:

Originally posted by invictusa invictusa wrote:

I cant speak for my alliance, but there are those willing to help militarily or otherwise to defend the justification of cleansing the game of a mindset that diminishes the progress of Elgea.

Will look forward to the Steel + GC punks/trolls vs. NC + forward thinking players conflict

Are you actually suggesting that attacking someone diminishes the "progress" (What does that even mean?) of Elgea?

invictusa can correct me, but I believe they mean the undeclared war part of it.  If NC wanted to issue a fight, then they should have just issued it and not dance about the room ignoring the elephant.

The loss of progress being that we don't tend to wage undeclared wars in Illyriad, like in other games.
Back to Top
Octavianus View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 30 Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Sep 2012 at 22:58
Ok :)
Back to Top
Kilotov V2.0 View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn
Avatar

Joined: 08 Sep 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 59
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Sep 2012 at 22:37
i have standards for the word abuse against newbs. usually i mean sieged to death. 
Back to Top
Octavianus View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 30 Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Sep 2012 at 22:34
"if you want a reaction of the community, here is my reaction: if the show is good i will clap hands, if the show is bad (newbie abuse in war context ) i will want to express my distaste. maybe even mid show. "

Too late. New settlements of STEEL members have been dipo-attacked.

Octavianus.


Back to Top
abstractdream View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 02 Oct 2011
Location: Oarnamly
Status: Offline
Points: 1857
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Sep 2012 at 20:57
Originally posted by Morphies Morphies wrote:

i got the wood for the Bon fire... PARTY PARTY PARTAAAAAAAAAY!!!


I can personally attest to the fact that Bonfyr had nothing to do with this. He does enjoy a good "party" though.
Bonfyr Verboo
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 7>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.