Neighbors

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

   ok my question here is:  Do you think an alliance has the moral right to chose its neighbors?  If so to what extent do they have the moral right to enforce that choice or is this only a choice when the alliance decides where to place its clusters?
Personally i think any alliance has the moral right to chose its neighbors, if you disagree with this then you would probably disagree with most RL zoning laws because in essence all they are is a way for the community as a whole to tell an individual what they can/cannot do with their land.

As for enforcement of this in game i believe that any alliance should be able to defend a city inside of their cluster if they like the city owner as a neighbor regardless of alliance that neighbor happens to be in or if they dislike the sieger so much that they cannot stand to think of that player as a neighbor.

If this choice is limited to only when the alliance decides where to cluster then it is no choice at all since this is a fluid game and players tend to move around, or stop playing opening the area up to newer players after the account is deleted.

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
mjc2 Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Wordsmith Joined: 13 May 2015 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 136	Post Options Post Reply Quote mjc2 Report Post Thanks(1) Quote Reply Posted: 10 Jun 2015 at 19:52
	ok my question here is: Do you think an alliance has the moral right to chose its neighbors? If so to what extent do they have the moral right to enforce that choice or is this only a choice when the alliance decides where to place its clusters? Personally i think any alliance has the moral right to chose its neighbors, if you disagree with this then you would probably disagree with most RL zoning laws because in essence all they are is a way for the community as a whole to tell an individual what they can/cannot do with their land. As for enforcement of this in game i believe that any alliance should be able to defend a city inside of their cluster if they like the city owner as a neighbor regardless of alliance that neighbor happens to be in or if they dislike the sieger so much that they cannot stand to think of that player as a neighbor. If this choice is limited to only when the alliance decides where to cluster then it is no choice at all since this is a fluid game and players tend to move around, or stop playing opening the area up to newer players after the account is deleted.