|
Post Reply
|
Page <1 678910 11> |
| Author | |
Pellinell
Forum Warrior
Joined: 08 Apr 2012 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 298 |
Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 14:39 |
That doesn't sound very neutral on Dark Empires part. BANE has always outnumbered NC significantly and still does, yet you are threatening NC with aid from Dark should no one else join BANE ? In my opinion that is an escalation by a much larger alliance that has no business in the current conflict.
|
|
![]() |
|
abstractdream
Postmaster General
Joined: 02 Oct 2011 Location: Oarnamly Status: Offline Points: 1857 |
Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 14:31 |
|
~NC~ is winning the recruiting drive too?
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Starry
Postmaster
Joined: 20 Mar 2010 Location: California Status: Offline Points: 612 |
Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 14:18 |
Halcyon, again, more spin. BANE has the advantage given the current numbers, in fact, they've had the advantage from the beginning of this war. If BANE is unhappy with the outcome of the war, they should be in "serious" negotiations with NC. Bane Pop: 3,821,885 Members 39 NC Pop: 2,694,778 Members 26 ' So now you are recruiting for BANE? They don't have a big enough advantage?
![]() |
|
|
CEO, Harmless?
Founder of Toothless? "Truth never dies." -HonoredMule |
|
![]() |
|
Halcyon
Forum Warrior
Joined: 17 Aug 2012 Location: Israel Status: Offline Points: 360 |
Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 14:05 |
|
And yet another TVM palyer comes to the aid of NC:
jtk310 Joined NC Sptember 1st with a population of 131158. Bringing the total numbers of joining NC to 13 against 10 joining Bane and the population balance of those joining to 405724 in NC's favor. If there is any brave soul (not an alliance yet) willing to join on Bane's side to balance this recent outside reinforcment to NC's power, I would appreciate if he notifies me in the next 24 hours, if one such player will not be found, I will have to join with a Dark account. My only reason for not doing it right away is that Dark is pretty far from the main battle area of this war. |
|
![]() |
|
abstractdream
Postmaster General
Joined: 02 Oct 2011 Location: Oarnamly Status: Offline Points: 1857 |
Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 05:56 |
|
Thanks for the clarification. Not complicated at all.
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Kompanion
Greenhorn
Joined: 08 Jan 2012 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 53 |
Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 05:51 |
|
I guess I am not going to enter a war of words on here. By that I mean, I don't feel the need to prevail in any argument on the forum.
We didn't seek public opinion for permission to Confed with Bane. If you are curious, we don't have plans to escalate the war. Halcyon tried to work towards peace. If other alliances would like to join in against Bane, we would be more than happy to come to the aid of Bane. It's really only as complicated as you wish to make it. Edited by Kompanion - 02 Sep 2013 at 05:54 |
|
![]() |
|
Brandmeister
Postmaster General
Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 2396 |
Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 05:48 |
Not to be obtuse, but how do you intend to "stand by Bane" without deploying troops? Because I'm pretty sure that deploying troops would count as an escalation, and that not deploying troops wouldn't really count as Standing By Bane (TM). Unless there is some kind of subtle middle ground that I'm missing here. This reminds me of a previous forum debate about, "Breaking sieges for confeds is a defensive attack, and does not constitute involvement in a war." Interesting theory, but completely unenforceable on your adversaries. |
|
![]() |
|
abstractdream
Postmaster General
Joined: 02 Oct 2011 Location: Oarnamly Status: Offline Points: 1857 |
Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 05:47 |
|
Is it just me who wonders how an alliance can stand by another without taking action? What does it mean that you have a Confederation with them? What does it mean that you continue to speak for them? What does it mean that you demand unconditional peace from their enemy? Will you stand by and do nothing if they ask you to take action? Will you take no action if they are clearly loosing the war?
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Kompanion
Greenhorn
Joined: 08 Jan 2012 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 53 |
Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 05:22 |
|
Bottom line for me is this:
Dark is now confederated with Bane, we do not have plans for escalating the war, but are willing to stand by Bane. Edited by Kompanion - 02 Sep 2013 at 05:23 |
|
![]() |
|
DeathDealer89
Postmaster
Joined: 04 Jan 2012 Status: Offline Points: 944 |
Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 05:16 |
My bad 13:12 Same result. Either way it shows Bane is just as guilty of 'recruiting' as NC. Also you may notice this odd trend of all those who joined up with Bane did so before NC got their friends involved. You could say Bane escalated things by doing such things as getting friends from other alliances involved. Or you know going and asking another alliance to 'demand peace' for them. Its quite clear the only ones escalating are bane and dark. Guess thats what happens when your losing the war. I say Dark does the same thing they 'demand' of everyone else and stay out of it.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1 678910 11> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |