Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - NC-Bane war
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedNC-Bane war

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 7891011>
Author
The Duke View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 22 Jul 2011
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 464
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 05:10
Originally posted by Halcyon Halcyon wrote:

Originally posted by DeathDealer89 DeathDealer89 wrote:

Based on your own post, Bane has added 16 people and NC has added 12.  

Thus Bane is actually doing more recruiting from outside the war than NC.  Guess you should have made this declaration against Bane rather than against NC.  Or you know sit back and watch what was before a pretty simple war between two parties.  


You are counting some of II's former members twice.
To be fair some joined- went back to II regrouped- then joined a 2nd time. All the BS aside tho- You cant stop an alliance from recruiting. You say Bane was low on troops from the tourney, and NC used that against Bane in declaring war. My question is this- If Dark were to enter the fold- would they not be taking advantage of the fact NC has been in a war for 3 months? 
If Malek is indeed your RL friend then sure back him up. Enter in the fray. However dont expect to make the rules by doing so(i.e Nobody can recruit, no confeds allowed ect.). When going to war for any reason you dont need to have public support. Everyone has their own agenda whether that means doing whats best for you/your alliance or helping a friend. 

Ask yourself if what ppl say in this thread will determine what your course of action will be. 
The voices of the mob are louder than their armies 9 times out of 10. 
Ive never had someone talk one of my cities into rubble :P
Sure other alliances can pile on- but hey you cant always wait for the devs to make a tourney in order for the game to be fun. Sometimes players NEED a war 
"Our generation has had no Great Depression, no Great War. Our war is spiritual. Our depression is our lives."
Back to Top
Llyr View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 267
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 05:00
Those who are involved in this "war" are there by choice because Illy has provided nothing new for over a year. So just leave them alone and let them play; they're doing their best to do something interesting in a dead game. Those who want to join in can leave their moribund alliance and join in for the fun Those who don't can carry on being bored harvesting grapes. I'm harvesting grapes.

Edited by Llyr - 02 Sep 2013 at 05:07

Back to Top
Halcyon View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 17 Aug 2012
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 360
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 04:43
Originally posted by DeathDealer89 DeathDealer89 wrote:

Based on your own post, Bane has added 16 people and NC has added 12.  

Thus Bane is actually doing more recruiting from outside the war than NC.  Guess you should have made this declaration against Bane rather than against NC.  Or you know sit back and watch what was before a pretty simple war between two parties.  


You are counting some of II's former members twice.
Back to Top
abstractdream View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 02 Oct 2011
Location: Oarnamly
Status: Offline
Points: 1857
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 04:01
Originally posted by Diomedes Diomedes wrote:

Noting that:
1. Halcyon initiated this post because of questions being raised in GC concerning the possibility of DARK entering the war, and
2. That, as Leader of DARK, Halcyon has declared there is no intention of DARK escalating the war,

that seems to answer the questions raised in GC, and if DARK now happened to enter the fray, it would surely reflect on the integrity of DARK's leadership and thereby diminish it.
I can only conclude that there will be no escalation by DARK alliance, and I thank Halcyon for answering the concerns of myself and others.
All other posts here, would seem to me, to be peripheral to the matter raised by Halcyon, and perhaps better suited to another forum thread where we might endless debate the merits or otherwise of the current conflict.


Couldn't he have stated such in GC any time he was asked?

Instead of simply answering questions and declaring his alliance militarily neutral he came to the Forum. He announced that he was demanding (his word) that ~NC~ accept peace without terms and that if they didn't they should at least stop recruiting.

It seems to me that because this thread was started all the posts in it are legitimate and were invited by the very existence of the thread.
Bonfyr Verboo
Back to Top
Diomedes View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 26 Mar 2012
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 208
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 03:15
Noting that:
1. Halcyon initiated this post because of questions being raised in GC concerning the possibility of DARK entering the war, and
2. That, as Leader of DARK, Halcyon has declared there is no intention of DARK escalating the war,

that seems to answer the questions raised in GC, and if DARK now happened to enter the fray, it would surely reflect on the integrity of DARK's leadership and thereby diminish it.
I can only conclude that there will be no escalation by DARK alliance, and I thank Halcyon for answering the concerns of myself and others.
All other posts here, would seem to me, to be peripheral to the matter raised by Halcyon, and perhaps better suited to another forum thread where we might endless debate the merits or otherwise of the current conflict.

"Walk in the way of the good, for the righteous will dwell in the land"
Back to Top
Brandmeister View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2012
Location: Laoshin
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 02:54
If I only had a 3:2 advantage over NC, I'd probably recruit heavily, too.

Jokes aside, the call for peace seems reasonable. However, I find it quite curious that BANE isn't speaking for itself. Is there a reason why most of its PR in chat and the forums is conducted by friendly third parties, or by players who deserted BANE? Malek and Sir Bradly are big boys, and I was under the impression that they are quite capable of articulating their positions on their own.

I also find it unusual that Halcyon has neglected to point out that Insanity Inc. spontaneously joined the conflict on BANE's side, adding a huge infusion of players, troops and population. It seems rather unreasonable to ask NC to refrain from recruiting their own friends to fight, given that their recruiting obviously happened twice in response to BANE's recruitment.

If you wish to limit participation in their war, perhaps all the Insanity Inc. players should leave BANE, and NC's allies can return to their home alliances. Then BANE and NC can settle things on the original military terms, as you have already proposed. I seriously doubt that either side will agree to return their powerful allies to the sidelines. As Angrim points out, NC isn't squeamish about warfare, and it was my longstanding impression that BANE wasn't either.

I would point out that debating the trigger event is rather academic. I seriously doubt this war is only about some sov claims in the newb ring, any more than the last major war was only about a Trove mine. There were lots of escalation points at which either side could have diffused the situation, and they both voluntarily chose to continue fighting.

I say let them settle it themselves.
Back to Top
Angrim View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Location: Laoshin
Status: Offline
Points: 1173
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 01:50
i'm not sure what the intent of the OP was; if a war is going to go on for 3+ months, it seems unreasonable to ask the involved parties to refrain from recruiting.  also, it's worth considering that the participants that have joined from other alliances may be only temporarily on one side or the other, and that their participation as individuals is, in fact, keeping them from agitating their respective alliances to join the conflict...thus keeping the war from escalating.

Originally posted by Starry Starry wrote:

I remember seeing SB state in GC that he had offered terms but they were rejected.   There are always two sides to the story but what  most players have seen in GC is the spin by BANE and DARK.
this seems quite prejudicial.  why assume that SB's statement in GC is not itself spin?  or is NC just better at it?  ;)

i remember all of this being about an NS player "surrounded" by BANE sov, but as BANE thereafter removed the offending sov, it seems clear there is more going on than that.  i am long resigned that NC fights when and whom it wants to.
Back to Top
Starry View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2010
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 612
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 00:29
I remember seeing SB state in GC that he had offered terms but they were rejected.   There are always two sides to the story but what  most players have seen in GC is the spin by BANE and DARK.   If BANE wants peace they should be talking directly to NC and negotiate terms; everyone else needs to stay out of it.    It is the usual procedure for procuring peace at the end of a war, the side winning sets the terms for peace.    

I'm not sure why a Mercenary Alliance that is paid to fight needs to have confeds.   Did it ever occur to you that confeding with a warring alliance might be construed as statement of support with the intention to escalate the war?    If you have read GC in the past few days, it is belief voiced by many who thought DARK was going to escalate the war.     While I'm happy to see you are encouraging everyone to stay out of it, I believe you should be a bit more transparent with the facts.
CEO, Harmless?
Founder of Toothless?

"Truth never dies."
-HonoredMule

Back to Top
Kumomoto View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General


Joined: 19 Oct 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 2224
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Sep 2013 at 00:11
I do believe KP coined the perfect Name-- The Banal War...
Back to Top
Tamaeon View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2011
Location: Centrum
Status: Offline
Points: 152
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Sep 2013 at 23:44
Originally posted by Halcyon Halcyon wrote:

There were questions asked about Dark's interest in The war between NC and Bane.
The main interest for us is that Malek is my personal friend and a long time friend to Dark.

I recently made a plea to NC leaders to end the war. my reasoning was that with their own members they do not have the power to beat Bane to submission. This war is ongoing for 3 months and no end is in sight.
I made NC 2 offers:
1) End the war and if you are interested in more action, come against Dark in a war of walls or a more total war and bring some of your friends (some, not all, mind you).
2) Have all the members that were not originally in the war leave the war and NC and Bane continue to slug it out between themselves.

NC rejected both my offers.
As things stand and if NC continue recruiting members from other alliances, this needless, endless war will expand until we may have a 2nd world war on our ends.

I call upon NC again to accept peace without terms.
If they reject my offer again, I call on all players out of the war to remain out and not expand this senseless war of attrition.

Halcyon for Dark.

Its not my intention defend Halcyon's remarks; but I can't help but notice, that he merely called for an end to the war. So far most replies appear to be focused on "escalation" and have paid no mind to DARK's call for peace.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 7891011>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.