Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Making a stand
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedMaking a stand

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 678
Author
Faenix View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior


Joined: 29 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 283
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Sep 2012 at 20:36
Quote Does this mean you won't be attacking Mana?  Because if that's the case, I'm sure my armies can be better used elsewhere.

We have no grievance with Mana.  I would suggest moving your troops to reinforce Gim if you intend them to be used.  

Yes, this is a tactically stupid message, if we were warmongers as we've been portrayed by the soapbox minority, we would have launched feints/attacks/sieges on Mana as soon as he declared on us, to keep at least some portion of his army (and others, apparently) tied up under the threat of military action.  It would have been tactically sound to send diplos at him as well to keep him from reinforcing STEEL in that manner as well. 

But, we're not warmongers, we've stated our position from the beginning and have not strayed from it.  We have no issue with Mana, if he chooses to reinforce Gim that's his prerogative.  Since he has declared war on us, should he choose to send attacks in our direction then we might have some future issue with him, but we're kind of preoccupied at the moment.
Back to Top
AdamTheGreat View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn
Avatar

Joined: 09 Sep 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 52
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Sep 2012 at 22:55
Eh, let them bore themselves. I say, Let them bash their skulls on our walls.
Sinn Fein "Ourselves Alone"
Back to Top
Jane DarkMagic View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 10 Sep 2011
Location: Tennessee
Status: Offline
Points: 554
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Sep 2012 at 23:45
Originally posted by Llyorn Of Jaensch Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote:

Originally posted by Rill Rill wrote:

I will stand with Mana. 


Originally posted by Jane DarkMagic Jane DarkMagic wrote:

I'll join you Mannanan. 


Are Rill and JDM actually supporting Mananan or is it acceptable to stand on principle on the sidelines only?

For if you do adhere to your words, then stopping at that makes you both little better than the champagne socialists whom bereave the plight of the poor whilst sleeping in french linen. Do you believe such, or was this more to ease your conscience in order for a good nights sleep?

If its the latter then know your future opinions will be held with little weight.

I've had troops involved for almost a week now.  So I'm not sure who you are calling of little weight. I'm lots of weight, thank you very much.
Back to Top
Jane DarkMagic View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 10 Sep 2011
Location: Tennessee
Status: Offline
Points: 554
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Sep 2012 at 23:47
Originally posted by Brids17 Brids17 wrote:

Oh boy, another "Here's our chance to all gang up on a single alliance and siege them out of the game in the name of justice". 

Who said anything about sieging anyone out of existance? 
Back to Top
Hadus View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 28 Jun 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 545
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 Sep 2012 at 02:33
Without villains there are no heroes.

I'm not calling NC a villain by any stretch, and I'm not advocating for either side. I'm suggesting that if everyone is of the mentality that disruptions to the social norms should be met with utter annihilation, eventually there will be no dissenters remaining, and no conflict, at which point Military combat may as well be removed from the game.

So I'm suggesting that whichever side you are on in this conflict, the goal should not be to siege the enemy out of the game. Rather look at it like a thorned plant in your yard. Although dangerous, it also brings a vibrant color to the scene. When it grows too wild and becomes a hazard, do not yank it out, but rather trim it back, that it may grow back and continue to color your yard.
Back to Top
Brids17 View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 Sep 2012 at 02:44
Edit: Realized this post was perhaps confrontational and argumentative and am thus removing it. 

Edited by Brids17 - 25 Sep 2012 at 05:11
Back to Top
Rill View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar
Player Council - Geographer

Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 Sep 2012 at 03:16
Originally posted by Hadus Hadus wrote:

Without villains there are no heroes.

I'm not calling NC a villain by any stretch, and I'm not advocating for either side. I'm suggesting that if everyone is of the mentality that disruptions to the social norms should be met with utter annihilation, eventually there will be no dissenters remaining, and no conflict, at which point Military combat may as well be removed from the game.

So I'm suggesting that whichever side you are on in this conflict, the goal should not be to siege the enemy out of the game. Rather look at it like a thorned plant in your yard. Although dangerous, it also brings a vibrant color to the scene. When it grows too wild and becomes a hazard, do not yank it out, but rather trim it back, that it may grow back and continue to color your yard.

This!

And Brids, so far as I know, no one is attacking NC, not even STEEL, which certainly has abundant reason to.
Back to Top
Jane DarkMagic View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 10 Sep 2011
Location: Tennessee
Status: Offline
Points: 554
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 Sep 2012 at 03:18
Why don't y'all just shake hands and end this already?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 678
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.