Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - League of nations "idea"
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedLeague of nations "idea"

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Kumomoto View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General


Joined: 19 Oct 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 2224
Direct Link To This Post Topic: League of nations "idea"
    Posted: 06 Mar 2011 at 20:40
Agreed, SF & TD. Overall we've seen written communication work quite well in resolving disputes! The key, imo, is that the leaders communicating need to maintain as open a mind as possible to the facts... 
 
I think Chat might help as well, perhaps...
 
K.
Back to Top
scottfitz View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior


Joined: 22 Apr 2010
Location: Spokane WA USA
Status: Offline
Points: 433
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Mar 2011 at 17:34
I agree, overall I do not feel the concept proposed her has any merit, and I agree that the primary mode of communication is and will always be messages, but the ability to set up private chats in addition to mail would be of some use
Back to Top
The_Dude View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General


Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Mar 2011 at 16:26
Originally posted by scottfitz scottfitz wrote:

The only part of this thread that is of interest to me is improved inter-alliance communication, a need that would be met fully by private chat functionality
Chat has a limited place.
 
For most problem solving, mail is a far better method of communication.  First, mail offers the writer a superior opportunity to chose his words carefully.  Second, chat is so informal that tone and context can often fail when dealing with sensitive issues.  Third, chat requires participants to be on-line at the same time which is often not possible in our global community.
 
I would say chat is useful when the players already have a sound relationship and the issue is small and uncomplicated.
 
I think the biggest impediment to communication is attitude.  The second biggest impediment is some players do not speak english fluently and use google translator which really can screw up tone and context.
Back to Top
Bragdush the Bald View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn
Avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 74
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Mar 2011 at 14:13
No to Attilla's League Thumbs Down
 
Yes to Nokigun's Confederate chat Thumbs Up
 
and three cheers for meBeerBeerBeer
Back to Top
scottfitz View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior


Joined: 22 Apr 2010
Location: Spokane WA USA
Status: Offline
Points: 433
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Mar 2011 at 07:25
The only part of this thread that is of interest to me is improved inter-alliance communication, a need that would be met fully by private chat functionality
Back to Top
Llyorn Of Jaensch View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Status: Offline
Points: 924
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Mar 2011 at 00:12
Against
Back to Top
Mr. Ubiquitous Feral View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Status: Offline
Points: 416
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Mar 2011 at 23:03

I guess there won't be any refugees.  Another job well done, Mr. Feral, very well done.

I am a Machine.
Back to Top
Raritor View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 20 Apr 2010
Location: Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 151
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Mar 2011 at 22:52
I also think relations between alliances are good as they are now. Bureocracy is never a good thing.


Back to Top
Brids17 View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Mar 2011 at 22:49
It's hard enough as is to have a war without the 200 confeds and naps being pulled in, making one side get utterly destroyed. The last thing we need is to make it worse by making every alliance have to "agree" on what's ok for an alliance to do. I'm against this idea. 
Back to Top
Grego View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 09 May 2010
Location: Klek
Status: Offline
Points: 729
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Mar 2011 at 22:21
Originally posted by Nokigon Nokigon wrote:

Why don't instead you have a chat room with your Confeds, that can only be viewed by people who're authorised to do so?



That would be better option.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.