| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
The_Dude 
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
|
 Posted: 12 Oct 2012 at 06:20 |
 Silverlake wrote:
*** There is a justice that cannot be swayed with sweet talk and flowers |
In Illy, Justice is delivered from the business-end of T2 Siege Machines.  |
 |
Silverlake
Forum Warrior
Joined: 15 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 417
|
Posted: 12 Oct 2012 at 06:03 |
|
I started this post because bullying is wrong, and just because you can call in bigger friends does not give you the right to FORCE others to your will. There is a justice that cannot be swayed with sweet talk and flowers
|
|
SunStorm
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Apr 2011
Location: "Look Up"
Status: Offline
Points: 979
|
Posted: 18 Sep 2012 at 17:11 |
Thes Hunter wrote:
All Alliances are a mixture of individuals. To say one alliance is bad because of the actions of some of it's members can be over simplifying things. If you feel there is bad behavior by a member of a 'big' alliance, than maybe you should contact the leadership of that alliance to take corrective action.
If you have a problem with a policy of an alliance, take it up with their leadership. Or even take it up with your leadership to discuss with their leadership. Communication is the key.
|
Spot on. (^_^)
|
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR
|
|
Thes Hunter
Wordsmith
Joined: 13 Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 129
|
Posted: 18 Sep 2012 at 17:03 |
All Alliances are a mixture of individuals. To say one alliance is bad because of the actions of some of it's members can be over simplifying things. If you feel there is bad behavior by a member of a 'big' alliance, than maybe you should contact the leadership of that alliance to take corrective action.
If you have a problem with a policy of an alliance, take it up with their leadership. Or even take it up with your leadership to discuss with their leadership. Communication is the key.
|
|
Brids17
Postmaster General
Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483
|
Posted: 16 Sep 2012 at 19:55 |
Silverleaf wrote:
I often wonder how many of them would actually stand alone- or have the attitude they do if they did not have a murder of crows backing them?? |
You should ask Calcr to tell you about what was going on before they were part of the crowiltion.
|
|
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
|
Posted: 15 Sep 2012 at 05:52 |
I share my wood freely, although of course it is not as good as Fluffy's. Ask any newb.
Edited to clarify: I mean, ask any newb whether I share my wood. Not about the quality of Fluffy's wood. I mean, some of them might know, but others might not. Not just anyone gets to sample Fluffy's wood.
Oh, wait ...
/me goes to hide
Edited by Rill - 15 Sep 2012 at 05:56
|
|
Ander
Postmaster General
Joined: 24 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1269
|
Posted: 15 Sep 2012 at 05:31 |
Rill wrote:
Interesting comment coming from a player in a Consone alliance. Last I heard, Consone is substantially larger than Crow. And unlike Crow, which grew rather organically ...
|
CE joined consone? 
I remember a school girl having to write a composition on 'post office' for an examination. But she had studied to write about 'cow' only. So she wrote - "Post office is not like cow. Post office doesn't eat grass. Post office doesn't give us milk... "
That said, I don't agree with the comments on Crow. I don't know the reason behind that post either.
Silverlake wrote:
you need to get off the cross, someone can use the wood.. |
Absolutely! Sharing makes it more fun to all.
|
|
Silverleaf
New Poster
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 24
|
Posted: 15 Sep 2012 at 04:43 |
was not necessarily singling crows out - and you comment about our being in Consone- yet - i believe it was formed as a direct result of the ever growing number alliances falling under the crow umbrella and other "super alliances" I could be wrong about that - but i don't think so - And I was not the one tht singled crows out at all- I commented on a previous comment that did single crows out -though in a more popular light to you i am sure - lol - I kind of like the cold war state it seems to be in - makes it interesting 
|
|
Silverlake
Forum Warrior
Joined: 15 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 417
|
Posted: 15 Sep 2012 at 04:34 |
|
Rill, you need to get off the cross, someone can use the wood... it is not about crows! There are other larges alliances that write policies their members don't follows... and they are eating up smaller alliance's claims to rare resources. I am getting tired of these bullies!
|
|
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
|
Posted: 14 Sep 2012 at 20:44 |
Silverleaf wrote:
that ridiculous mindset that more means better - I often wonder how many of them would actually stand alone- or have the attitude they do if they did not have a murder of crows backing them?? - I give WAY more respect to the smaller alliances tht stand their ground and the players that seek these smaller alliances. |
Interesting comment coming from a player in a Consone alliance. Last I heard, Consone is substantially larger than Crow. And unlike Crow, which grew rather organically for the most part as players from established Crow alliances began their own alliances and chose to affiliate, Consone is a group of alliances that began independently and decided to announce a confederated group in order to ... apparently establish that they are a group to be reckoned with.
I have nothing against Consone and respect many fine players in Consone. I also have nothing against the idea of a group of alliances that "have each others' backs," whether it's Harmless? and DLords, the Crow alliances, Consone, whatever. I personally think having a large group of friendly players makes that game more fun.
But when one of your members singles out Crows for being a large group of confederated alliances I just have to well ...
Edited by Rill - 14 Sep 2012 at 20:45
|
|
Tweet
Larger alliances taking advantage of smaller ones
