|
Post Reply 
|
Page 123 6> |
| Author | |
Silverlake 
Forum Warrior 
Joined: 15 Oct 2011 Status: Offline Points: 417 |
 Topic: Larger alliances taking advantage of smaller onesPosted: 08 Sep 2012 at 23:01 |
|
I find it reprehensible that larger alliances are taking advantage of smaller alliances by harvesting resources from the smaller alliance's sov squares, attacking their camped armies, and not even following their own rules! If you say you are going to attack anyone camped or harvesting within 5 squares of your cities, but your members do this to others, that is the height of hypocrisy... shame of you!!!!
|
|
 |
|
|
Myr
Forum Warrior
Joined: 26 May 2011 Location: Orlando, FL Status: Offline Points: 437 |
Posted: 09 Sep 2012 at 01:24 |
|
Well said sir.
|
|
|
|
|
Hadus
Postmaster 
Joined: 28 Jun 2012 Status: Offline Points: 545 |
Posted: 09 Sep 2012 at 21:46 |
|
Perhaps the smaller alliances could work together and craft their own confederation, in order to protect each other in the event larger alliances exert their power in an unbecoming manner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
twilights
Postmaster
Joined: 21 May 2012 Status: Offline Points: 915 |
Posted: 10 Sep 2012 at 00:49 |
|
havent u guys figured it out yet, dont be fooled by these silly rules, the only rules are illy rules, i suggest joining a crow alliance, they rule the game and u have to respect them for that
|
|
|
|
|
vty
Wordsmith
Joined: 24 Jan 2012 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 119 |
Posted: 10 Sep 2012 at 01:07 |
|
Crafting is causing unnecessary drama
|
|
|
|
|
Aurordan
Postmaster
Player Council - Ambassador Joined: 21 Sep 2011 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 982 |
Posted: 10 Sep 2012 at 04:34 |
|
Crafting doesn't cause drama, people cause drama.
|
|
|
|
|
Smoking GNU
Forum Warrior
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Location: Windhoek Status: Offline Points: 313 |
Posted: 10 Sep 2012 at 09:25 |
|
Guns don't kill people. I DO! HAA HAA!
|
|
|
|
|
Bard
Wordsmith
Joined: 21 Feb 2012 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 121 |
Posted: 10 Sep 2012 at 18:47 |
|
I give you the word share, in all it's common usage:
to take a share or part <everyone in the enterprise will sharein the profits> Synonyms participate, share This suddenly seems to be a foreign notion in Illy. Personally I have found it works incredibly well if you share guard duties, share the items and avoid conflict. Silverlake is correct of course, but it is not unexpected that all of a sudden "might makes right" and sov and other such inhibitors of socially unsanctioned behaviour have totally disappeared in the face of trade v2. I was hoping they wouldn't, but I am a realist. Some people just have to have it all, and if they are big enough they will take it. However, there are pockets of resistance to this mentality, and in time it will be interesting to see who does in fact end up with the larger "share" of items. It's hard to produce when you're getting bumped 50% of the time by irate players. When you share that just doesn't happen. We live in interesting times.
|
|
|
|
|
SunStorm
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Apr 2011 Location: "Look Up" Status: Offline Points: 979 |
Posted: 11 Sep 2012 at 19:49 |
Agreed. (:P) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loud Whispers
Wordsmith
Joined: 31 Jul 2012 Location: Saltmines Status: Offline Points: 196 |
Posted: 11 Sep 2012 at 21:12 |
"I felt I didn't need to message you before bumping your harvesters and locking down the patch because I thought you were inactive." "Inactives send harvesters?" "..." :/
|
|
|
"These forums are a Godwin's Law free zone."~GM Luna
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page 123 6> |
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Larger alliances taking advantage of smaller ones
Topic Options
Aurordan wrote: