Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - KT vs. =EoQ=
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedKT vs. =EoQ=

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Kurfist View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 824
Direct Link To This Post Topic: KT vs. =EoQ=
    Posted: 13 Jul 2011 at 00:47
/me shrugs

MOAR

Patience is a virtue, resource giving is a sin
Back to Top
StJude View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 568
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Jul 2011 at 00:43
Originally posted by (EOM) Harry (EOM) Harry wrote:

MOAR!


NO U!
Back to Top
(EOM) Harry View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 06 Oct 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 283
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Jul 2011 at 19:27
MOAR!
Fool's watch the land when the problem is in the heart.
Back to Top
StJude View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 568
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Jul 2011 at 06:26
Originally posted by Kurfist Kurfist wrote:

i have to admit, i made the agreement and didnt copy the log because i thought youd stick to your word , obviously not. the agreement was to have the leadership of both parties be the sole targets, which is obviously not the case anymore.


This is hearsay and rumor until you produce documentation proving otherwise.

I distinctly remember asking you to post a conditions thread, you didn't. You did send some dumb roleplaying IGM saying to our members you were only after their leaders and they would receive compensation.

I think you can see from the blitzkrieg of attacks that our members reject your terms. Like true allies they have our backs. Their reply in short is "NUTS"

KT is a true alliance of players, no one is being "used". All members are aware of the consequences and are willing participants of these shenanigans.


Back to Top
Baughb View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 31
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Jul 2011 at 05:38
then were you lying when you said the following which was sent to Gaia, because you said you did copy the chat logs here

> RE: RE: RE: RE: Hey :S
> Received: 09 Jul 2011 23:17
> Original Message:

i have the chatlog in my inbox somewhere, it was made on global a few days ago.

<.<

> RE: RE: RE: Hey :S
> Received: 09 Jul 2011 23:17
> Original Message:

I think it's ended.. Sorry to be a pain in your arse

> RE: RE: Hey :S
> Received: 09 Jul 2011 23:04
> Original Message:

when this idiotic conversation ends.

> RE: Hey :S
> Received: 09 Jul 2011 23:03
> Original Message:

Not that I doubt your word but may I please have the terms of engagement and the report of the fight that broke those rules#?

< name="MsgID" value="1" ="">< name="MsgID" value="13985807" ="">< name="PID" value="46469" ="">< ="medium sendMsgSubmit" value="Reply" ="submit">< name="MsgID" value="2" ="">< name="MsgID" value="13985807" ="">< ="medium sendMsgSubmit" value="Forward" ="submit">
Back to Top
Kurfist View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 824
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Jul 2011 at 04:40
i have to admit, i made the agreement and didnt copy the log because i thought youd stick to your word , obviously not. the agreement was to have the leadership of both parties be the sole targets, which is obviously not the case anymore.
Patience is a virtue, resource giving is a sin
Back to Top
Baughb View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 31
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Jul 2011 at 04:08
also, the low ranked people we attacked have 2000 - 4000 pop. as big as CV or bigger, so are we to not attack anyone at all? do you understand the concept of war? we dont have to wait for you to attack us, we can go on the offensive and we have.
Back to Top
Baughb View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 31
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Jul 2011 at 03:59
and of course you have a copy of this conversation? no? didnt think so. you want to know why? cause it never happened.
just out of morbid curiosity, what was this "agreement"?
Back to Top
Gemley View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Location: Ralidor
Status: Offline
Points: 586
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Jul 2011 at 03:35
Originally posted by Brids17 Brids17 wrote:

It amazes me that so many low pop new players are capable of starting so much trouble...
Yeah, whats you going do
 
eats pancakes while watching the many newbie wars in illyriad


Edited by Gemley - 10 Jul 2011 at 03:37
�I do not love the bright sword for it's sharpness, nor the arrow for it's swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend� - J.R.R. Tolkien
Back to Top
Brids17 View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Jul 2011 at 03:33
It amazes me that so many low pop new players are capable of starting so much trouble...
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.