| Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
The_Dude
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
|
Posted: 13 Apr 2011 at 03:54 |
Createure wrote:
Anyhow, call me a selfish right-wing troglodite, but I'm of the old-fashioned school of thought that believes those that have worked hard for a long-time deserve to have an advantage over others from time to time. 
|
You selfish right-wing troglodite! HA! I made myelf laugh.
There is ample opportunity for smaller/medium player to earn a Greatest Hunter victory.
|
 |
Createure
Postmaster General
Joined: 07 Apr 2010
Location: uk
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: 13 Apr 2011 at 02:22 |
*what Empress said... @Atilla: you mentioned that in a few months, you could be the size of larger players - this part is true, very rapid growth is achievable in Illyriad if you spend some prestige, and more importantly: take alot of time to keep building ques full and ship resources from resource-rich to resource-poor cities. The other part you mentioned is that you being bigger in a few months is useless because the big players will be even bigger - This part has a fallacy in it: limitations in the maximum population provided by a maxed out city, combined with the limited amount of food each city can produce when maxed, and the increasing population cost of settling each new city means that all top Illyriad members will eventually reach a plateau where there rate at which they can grow gets smaller and smaller. This means that any new account created today has every opportunity to close the gap and compete with accounts created a year ago given some good tactics and a little activity. The only thing they will miss out on is witnessing a year of Illyriad's evolution. Anyhow, call me a selfish right-wing troglodite, but I'm of the old-fashioned school of thought that believes those that have worked hard for a long-time deserve to have an advantage over others from time to time.
Edited by Createure - 13 Apr 2011 at 02:23
|
 |
Empress Olivia
New Poster
Joined: 22 Feb 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 10
|
Posted: 12 Apr 2011 at 22:34 |
Attila the Hun wrote:
I was just making a general point that someone my size and lower has absolutely no chance in winning any portion of this tournament.
|
That is complete bunk. Medium size players like you have a very good chance of getting the top hunter prizes.
|
 |
Attila the Hun
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Location: Navvare/FL
Status: Offline
Points: 402
|
Posted: 12 Apr 2011 at 22:16 |
|
What a waste of a comment.
|
|
It's just a game. :)
|
 |
lorre
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Location: Groot Kortrijk
Status: Offline
Points: 446
|
Posted: 12 Apr 2011 at 22:13 |
Attila the Hun wrote:
Nowhere did I mention non-paying players. I am a non-paying player but that didn't even cross my mind, though now it does bring out some details
A: paying players can have a few ques open on production buildings-more equipment made B- paying players can quickly up buildings, for better research or military units.
Thought that was not the way my argument was going, I was just making a general point that someone my size and lower has absolutely no chance in winning any portion of this tournament.
|
sorry wasnt ment at you mate was at absabeen or something :s
|
|
The battlefield is a scene of constant chaos. The winner will be the one who controls that chaos, both his own and the enemies.
Napoleon Bonaparte
|
 |
Attila the Hun
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Location: Navvare/FL
Status: Offline
Points: 402
|
Posted: 12 Apr 2011 at 22:07 |
|
Nowhere did I mention non-paying players. I am a non-paying player but that didn't even cross my mind, though now it does bring out some details
A: paying players can have a few ques open on production buildings-more equipment made B- paying players can quickly up buildings, for better research or military units.
Thought that was not the way my argument was going, I was just making a general point that someone my size and lower has absolutely no chance in winning any portion of this tournament.
|
|
It's just a game. :)
|
 |
lorre
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Location: Groot Kortrijk
Status: Offline
Points: 446
|
Posted: 12 Apr 2011 at 22:00 |
And if you want to give the non-paying players a chance of actually getting something: split the tournament into divisions.
are you saying non paying players can't compete? cause as far i now prestige doesnt let u produce troops faster seeing it still only builds 1 queqe at a tile or it doesnt let u produce weapons and armour faster for the same reason all it gives an advantage in is the 10% attack or defencevalue
i dunno
|
|
The battlefield is a scene of constant chaos. The winner will be the one who controls that chaos, both his own and the enemies.
Napoleon Bonaparte
|
 |
Attila the Hun
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Location: Navvare/FL
Status: Offline
Points: 402
|
Posted: 12 Apr 2011 at 21:54 |
Mr. Ubiquitous Feral wrote:
Attila the Hun wrote:
If I may inset my person in to this discussion. While the tournament in nice, and I and some members are participating, those with larger armies, the players who have been in the game longer will be the ones winning.
They have the ability to train hundreds of soldiers as the weeks go by, mass produce equipment, have proper taxation for said soldiers.
The only "Win" i and my members will receive from this, is a few levels to our commanders, from attacking all the npc's.
|
This is where some players with larger armies came from. Time takes time. |
By that, they could also be the ones that win these tournys. In a few months i could be their size, but they'd still be larger. therefor more military prowess, =more chance of winning. @SC, You made a comment to hunt perhaps a rarer animal, that would work but once someone sees i had a body part of that animal they would detect a easy win and very simply overtake me with a larger army.
|
|
It's just a game. :)
|
 |
Manannan
Postmaster
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Location: Mystical Mists
Status: Offline
Points: 576
|
Posted: 12 Apr 2011 at 21:51 |
I know I'm going to repeat a few things said by others but c'est la vie!
SC and TC have produced a fantastic tournament for us that like the game itself is very in depth. Although I realize it will be difficult for Wheel of Time to compete with the larger alliances this is not stopping us from taking part. What the old sayings, 'Its not the winning but the taking part which matters' and of course 'You have to be in it to win it.'
It gives members a kick into learning some of the nuances of combat and the opportunity to boost their commanders experience. I haven't personally stopped answering questions about armies in the last day or so and everyone is very enthusiastic.
The tournament also distracts us and stops us bothering poor SC everytime he strolls into GC about factions.
Hats off to the Illy team. You've pulled a cracker once again lads! 
PS Is it just me or does the other news in the Herald hint at the release of factions 'soon (tm)' 
|
|
Doesn't look good... doesn't look bad either!
"Manananananananananan, so long Sir, and thanks for all the fish." ~ St.Jude
|
 |
Mr. Ubiquitous Feral
Forum Warrior
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Status: Offline
Points: 416
|
Posted: 12 Apr 2011 at 21:41 |
Attila the Hun wrote:
If I may inset my person in to this discussion. While the tournament in nice, and I and some members are participating, those with larger armies, the players who have been in the game longer will be the ones winning.
They have the ability to train hundreds of soldiers as the weeks go by, mass produce equipment, have proper taxation for said soldiers.
The only "Win" i and my members will receive from this, is a few levels to our commanders, from attacking all the npc's.
|
This is where some players with larger armies came from. Time takes time.
|
|
I am a Machine.
|
 |