| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
abstractdream 
Postmaster General
Joined: 02 Oct 2011
Location: Oarnamly
Status: Offline
Points: 1857
|
 Posted: 30 Mar 2013 at 01:02 |
 HATHALDIR wrote:
...we are all decent people worthy of respect. |
To someone who has seen how you actually treat others, this is the crux.
|
|
Bonfyr Verboo
|
 |
The Electrocutioner
Forum Warrior
Joined: 09 Sep 2012
Location: Arran
Status: Offline
Points: 234
|
Posted: 30 Mar 2013 at 00:19 |
HATHALDIR wrote:
Well i stand here with shovel in hand, EE cannot make peace with converations like this. |
You mean the conversation you started by creating this thread?
|
|
HATHALDIR
Forum Warrior
Joined: 01 Jul 2011
Location: Adelaide
Status: Offline
Points: 380
|
Posted: 30 Mar 2013 at 00:11 |
Well i stand here with shovel in hand, EE cannot make peace with converations like this. At no stage would i allow that from a stranger, let alone someone on-line, we are all decent people worthy of respect. I say to H? what you have done publicly is now shown you do privately as well,the biggest loser of this whole debacle is illyriad itself. I will continue to play the game of Illy, if you want my cities you know where they are, i will not resist, but i will not surrender now either, tis a small price to fight tyranny. This is the message i was trying to convey, i grow tired of the charcter slurs (again i admit to being guilty of it with two people). I am neither delusional, untrustworthy, or a bad representative of the Eagles alliances. We are united in what we believe, and the way we are persuing our goals. Which is what we believe is the for the good of the game. I thank those of you who have sent me IGM's in support of our stance, thankyou, they have been of great solace. We will contniue fighting our rearguard action, but currently any thought of surrender is far away. What we were fighting for will not be acheived with surrender. It was never about a mine.
[/QUOTE]
|
|
There's worse blokes than me!!
|
|
Starry
Postmaster
Joined: 20 Mar 2010
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 612
|
Posted: 29 Mar 2013 at 14:20 |
The_Dude wrote:
Raatalagk wrote:
KillerPoodle wrote:
...
With respect to the Coalition each leader decided, voluntarily, to allow H? to negotiate on their behalf. We demanded nothing. We politely asked how everyone would like to proceed and each and every leader said "We have faith in H? to negotiate terms on our behalf". We discussed and agreed the basis for terms and then advised Coalition leaders on how negotiations were proceeding and the end result.
|
I also can confirm this. |
I can also confirm this.
H? was very diligent in seeking my input re: terms with WE. There was a point when I may have been more difficult for Starry to "negotiate" with than WE was.  But Starry was extremely patient and was able to move both RES and WE to deal that all agreed to. |
Actually you weren't, TD, as negotiators representing the Coalition it was important to the H Directors to get a deal that was agreeable to both the Coalition and the former Consone alliance. It should be noted that I have high regard for the former Consone alliance leaders I worked with and they have earned my respect.
Edit: It takes communication and the willingness to settle in order to achieve surrender terms acceptable by both parties. Yes, in all cases, the original terms were modified to achieve an agreement that was agreeable by both the Coalition and the surrendering alliance. It does take work and it does take compromise, we have not seen that from EE.
Edited by Starry - 29 Mar 2013 at 14:24
|
|
CEO, Harmless?
Founder of Toothless?
"Truth never dies."
-HonoredMule
|
|
geofrey
Postmaster General
Joined: 31 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1013
|
Posted: 29 Mar 2013 at 13:49 |
Raatalagk wrote:
Geofrey, BSH declared war on AA independently from the Coalition, and we resolved it independently (quite amicably, I thought, and with almost no terms). So this is irrelevant to the topic at hand. |
My deepest apologies then. Here I am assuming things and making a huge...donkey... out of myself. So sorry. I corrected my previous post. Amicably surely describes the manner of our peace.
Edited by geofrey - 29 Mar 2013 at 13:53
|
|
|
|
ES2
Postmaster
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 550
|
Posted: 29 Mar 2013 at 13:48 |
Rill wrote:
Really sorry to hear that CGP has left the game, he was a player I very much enjoyed playing alongside. Always a kind word, rarely a harsh one. A class act all around. Players who join Illy in the future are the poorer for not having a chance to know him. |
Hm,
He was an interesting soul to be sure, though he left on his own accord. He could have simply cut his losses and rebuilt, perhaps a real life event came up?
|
|
Eternal Fire
|
|
Raatalagk
Wordsmith
Joined: 13 Dec 2011
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 154
|
Posted: 29 Mar 2013 at 13:34 |
|
Geofrey, BSH declared war on AA independently from the Coalition, and we resolved it independently (quite amicably, I thought, and with almost no terms). So this is irrelevant to the topic at hand.
|
|
The_Dude
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
|
Posted: 29 Mar 2013 at 13:31 |
Raatalagk wrote:
KillerPoodle wrote:
...
With respect to the Coalition each leader decided, voluntarily, to allow H? to negotiate on their behalf. We demanded nothing. We politely asked how everyone would like to proceed and each and every leader said "We have faith in H? to negotiate terms on our behalf". We discussed and agreed the basis for terms and then advised Coalition leaders on how negotiations were proceeding and the end result.
|
I also can confirm this. |
I can also confirm this.
H? was very diligent in seeking my input re: terms with WE. There was a point when I may have been more difficult for Starry to "negotiate" with than WE was. But Starry was extremely patient and was able to move both RES and WE to deal that all agreed to.
|
|
geofrey
Postmaster General
Joined: 31 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1013
|
Posted: 29 Mar 2013 at 13:27 |
Raatalagk wrote:
KillerPoodle wrote:
...
With respect to the Coalition each leader decided, voluntarily, to allow H? to negotiate on their behalf. We demanded nothing. We politely asked how everyone would like to proceed and each and every leader said "We have faith in H? to negotiate terms on our behalf". We discussed and agreed the basis for terms and then advised Coalition leaders on how negotiations were proceeding and the end result.
|
I also can confirm this. |
I can personally vouch for this not being true, as the BSH negotiated peace with me. We agreed on terms. But Harmless? did not accept them. Thus the peace negotiation with the BSH & A.A. was rendered false by Harmless?/The Dude/ Dlords on these forums.
EDIT: Raatalagk has corrected this statement below, and I no longer consider it fact. Striking out to keep this post full of Just the Facts.
Edited by geofrey - 29 Mar 2013 at 13:51
|
|
|
|
Raatalagk
Wordsmith
Joined: 13 Dec 2011
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 154
|
Posted: 29 Mar 2013 at 13:25 |
KillerPoodle wrote:
...
With respect to the Coalition each leader decided, voluntarily, to allow H? to negotiate on their behalf. We demanded nothing. We politely asked how everyone would like to proceed and each and every leader said "We have faith in H? to negotiate terms on our behalf". We discussed and agreed the basis for terms and then advised Coalition leaders on how negotiations were proceeding and the end result.
|
I also can confirm this.
|
|
Tweet
Just the facts Ma'am
