Subatoi wrote:
All right then,
My member has been pvp'ing with another player over a settlement issue. Ground rules of truce worked out, no diplo'iong, military or blighting done by anyone outside these two.
Low and behold, the player my member is pvp'ing against is on the losing side and starts to hide his armies, close enough to be recalled for siege, but hidden to avoid being destroyed. Discovered to be hiding his armies around his *brother* juxwin, it's deemed fair by juxwin as it wasn't mentioned in the truce that one cant do that. Note: juxwin has been taken to hiding his armies around juxwins, scouts very probably being placed in said armies to make ti harder to figure out whos is whos.
an irritance until...
Juxwin accidentally sends my member a message meant for rill, encouraging her to place armies among jonazz's, what happens? one of her armies gets killed.
|
LOL I just saw this thread. How I missed out on all the fun!
*brother*? Well you certainly have the right to say that, since you don't actually know me and jonazz. However, I would be better to take me at my word.
Encouraging? I remember that I said "Though not necessary, you can join in the fun if you want". I never encouraged her. According to a dictionary, encouragement is the verbal act of urging on. I gave Ryelle permission to join, I never urged her.
Don't fault Ryelle. Fromfrak dragged her into the conflict by asking for a protective blight and without informing her of the PVP. With the convenient excuse that "we thought it was allowed by the terms of the PVP". It's irrelevant now, but she duped Ryelle in the first place. I can imagine how she feels. You do not have the right to complain of her corresponding actions. An eye for an eye, huh.
Anyway, its over now and fromfrak won her hard earned spot. Though a very disputable claim in my opinion, I respect the outcome of the contest.
Edited by Juswin - 10 Jun 2012 at 15:50