| Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
ULYSSEUS
New Poster
Joined: 26 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 35
|
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 09:19 |
Aurordan wrote:
Good GM man, formatting. Natural shifts in though should be split into different paragraphs, and each new paragraph should be indented. Two spaces between sentences would help too. I can't even attempt to read that. |
Thank you for your constructive critique. I shall keep it in mind in the future.
|
|
Some men die young, some men die old, but all men die.
|
 |
Sovereign
Greenhorn
Joined: 20 May 2011
Location: TEXAS
Status: Offline
Points: 43
|
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 09:03 |
|
The more and more I read posts from Celebcalen and Kurfist, it makes me think that you should be required to have an active account (in game) to post in the forums. That and if you try and hide behind a fake name, your account name is still some how linked.
First off, if you are not playing, you have less of a vested interest. Secondly, you may not be privy to all that goes on "In Game". Sure your buds may fill you in with their biased versions of the facts, but you were not there to read it for yourselves. Lastly, much like how mouthing off too much in GC can get you consequences, I think people should have some accountability for what they say here as well. Anything less and I will dare say, is cowardice. Now if you want to blurt out that you have some secret account and so you have in fact kept up to date with things in game, then the cowardice comment applies doubly so.
Tell you what Celeb and Kurf; if you can manage to bring your ratio of comments to being 50% the negative shyte you pass for posts and 50% neutral, positive and/or truly informative in some way; then I will whole heartedly support you posting in the forums. But right now, I say you are cowards and trolls only.
Mind you, what I think is probably irrelevant but at least I will clarify and even concede points as necessary. That, and seeing how I am clearly represented in game and easy to find, I can be held accountable for what I put in here. I challenge you to do the same or I hope that the devs will punt you guys to the curb eventually.
My apologies to everyone else, just tired of their non-sense. At least Jude, weather you agree with him or not; he is right there and in plain sight.
~Sov~
|
 |
Aurordan
Postmaster
Player Council - Ambassador
Joined: 21 Sep 2011
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 982
|
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 09:00 |
|
Good GM man, formatting. Natural shifts in though should be split into different paragraphs, and each new paragraph should be indented. Two spaces between sentences would help too. I can't even attempt to read that.
|
 |
ULYSSEUS
New Poster
Joined: 26 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 35
|
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 08:09 |
Dark never has been a training alliance. I am not sure where that piece of
misinformation came from but I could take a pretty accurate guess and probably be right on target. However that is not important to this conversation.
As leader of Dark I have remained silent on this issue of Jude, his alliance ICON and
the relationship they have with the rest of the Illy community. I have done so for a
couple of reasons 1. my alliance is young and i was unwilling to expose them to a war
that could be costly to their growth, morale and desire to actively play the game.
Though I am sure some of my members would have enjoyed going to war, the reality
is most are not Illy "savvy" enough to do so in spite of their enthusiasm for it.
2. I had no contact or relationship with Jude or ICON. the only information I had
was what was expressed in gc and the forums. Being far up in the western realms,
we had not suffered any serious attacks and the alliance my brother --stumpff-- and I
had founded was growing nicely. We entered a confederation with nightbringers as an
equal, a brother alliance, not as night's training alliance.
So I was content to remain neutral and see how things unfolded with the major
alliances vs valar/ICON. However this was not to be, one of my alliance members
iofilip desired to start another alliance. At first this seemed like a good idea for him
personally, so I was not opposed to it and agreed that if he desired to do so, I would
help however i could in growing his new alliance. Unfortunately, I was unaware
of how he planned to build his alliance and who he was involving to achieve a fair
amount of players with substantial pop committed to his alliance before it had even
officially been formed.
When he approached me with his idea and who he was inviting into the alliance I
was very concerned and advised strongly against it as did several other leaders
notably myrin/myr. The subsequent fall-out was predictable and I had warned iofilip it
would be so. My warnings and that of the others fell on deaf ears. Unfortunately, iofilip
had direct links to DARK and through his alt to Night. I felt a responsibility to DARK,
Night and the Illy community at large to make a statement through military action that
we did not approve of the direction ~DN~ had plans to follow nor the membership it
had and was recruiting (basically all of ICON).
So having witnessed the conspiring between iofilip and Jude for their new alliance I
felt that some action on my part was necessary and right. I had been left feeling very
uncomfortable with what I had heard and seen transpiring in their planning and
advised all my Dark OverLords of my concern. I will not name others who were
present, only to say they also shared my concerns, with the exception of the ICON
members, who I did not discuss this with on any level. So as the leader of DARK with
input from my Dark OverLords and myr of nightbringers it was decided that I, stumpff,
myrin/myr would engage in military action against Jude.
The scope of this action right now, is limited to one city targeted for siege. My aim
here is to show the community we are concerned our alliances were linked to an
alliance ~DN~ who's ultimate direction we neither approved of nor assisted in
evolving as it turned out too. I do not consider myself a judge of each players
personal game style or how they play the game, as long as it is self contained it is not
a problem for me. Having said that i do have a problem when another players style
and game play affect others in a negative manner not once but over and over and it
feels like we have reached that point in the Illy communities relationship with Jude
and ICON.
I have been long winded here but i felt it important to put the information out
there as i believe it to be, I am not an eloquent writer so forgive my grammatical
mistakes, I tried.
As far as DARK'S continued involvement in this conflict after our siege
on Jude's city that remains to be seen and in large part depends on their alliances
condition and reactions to us after the siege. So to clear the air the responsibility for
DARKS involvement is mine not Night, nor myr. Any criticism please direct it at me.
Edited by ULYSSEUS - 07 Oct 2011 at 10:23
|
|
Some men die young, some men die old, but all men die.
|
 |
Kilotov of DokGthung
Postmaster
Joined: 07 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 723
|
Posted: 06 Oct 2011 at 23:07 |
|
maybe the coalition was right all the way... we really should get rid of you guys now.
|
 |
Celebcalen
Forum Warrior
Joined: 18 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 288
|
Posted: 06 Oct 2011 at 23:03 |
Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote:
Myrin wrote:
I need no justification for my sieges other than my history with you. My conscience is quite clear. |
What I said.
StJude wrote:
Would you be willing to share publicly why you feel our "history" deserves a siege?
What specific act led you to your decision? |
No. You're done. | Does anybody have a clue what Lawn is trying to say. It makes no sense at all ? Brains must have been in short supply the day Lawnie breathed his first Aww. Please Dr Frankenstien. Ya forgot me brains mate and me incontinence pads.
|
 |
Llyorn Of Jaensch
Postmaster
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Status: Offline
Points: 924
|
Posted: 06 Oct 2011 at 22:24 |
Myrin wrote:
I need no justification for my sieges other than my history with you. My conscience is quite clear. |
What I said.
StJude wrote:
Would you be willing to share publicly why you feel our "history" deserves a siege?
What specific act led you to your decision? |
No. You're done.
Edited by Llyorn Of Jaensch - 06 Oct 2011 at 22:31
|
|
"ouch...best of luck." HonoredMule
|
 |
Myrin
Greenhorn
Joined: 06 Oct 2011
Location: Illinois
Status: Offline
Points: 52
|
Posted: 06 Oct 2011 at 21:06 |
Actually, anyone who has a problem with me sieging you is welcome to contact me. However, I do not believe that anything is solved in the forums or on GC. It is just an opportunity to puff your feathers and try to look like the bigger turkey. I am not seeking the approval of anyone for anything, therefore I don't feel the need to air our dirty laundry.
|
 |
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
|
Posted: 06 Oct 2011 at 19:47 |
|
No! Not the HDTV!!!
|
 |
StJude
Postmaster
Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 568
|
Posted: 06 Oct 2011 at 19:29 |
Myrin wrote:
I need no justification for my sieges other than my history with you. My conscience is quite clear. |
Would you be willing to share publicly why you feel our "history" deserves a siege?
What specific act led you to your decision?
|
 |