How can this be fair? |
Post Reply 
|
Page <12345 7> |
| Author | |||
Celebrant 
Greenhorn 
Joined: 20 Sep 2017 Location: Bukurest Status: Offline Points: 86 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Posted: 20 Sep 2017 at 19:18 |
||
|
Do developers have the habit of answering, or at least reading, written by their customers?
|
|||
 |
|||
|
lorre
Forum Warrior 
Joined: 29 Jun 2010 Location: Groot Kortrijk Status: Offline Points: 446 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Sep 2017 at 19:04 |
||
incase you hadnt noticed stukkah, it is not the destroying cities or even demanding ingame gold that i have an issue with. the issue is with the demanding access to someone elses account to read through their PRIVATE mails. these are not game mechanics and if you think they are, i suggest you start being carefull. they might be ingame private mails but private none the less
|
|||
|
The battlefield is a scene of constant chaos. The winner will be the one who controls that chaos, both his own and the enemies.
Napoleon Bonaparte |
|||
|
|||
|
Stukahh
Forum Warrior
Joined: 03 Feb 2015 Location: Fellandire, BL Status: Offline Points: 266 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Sep 2017 at 18:57 |
||
|
Let's be careful not to equate using game mechanics to force compliance as the same as using RL threats or coercion.
We can threaten someone's cities and armies all we want. That is not a violation of the CoC. No one is bring forced to do anything here. She had a chance to surrender and comply to set out terms. She also could have made a counter offer or just flat out declined the terms. Players are allowed within the CoC to destroy the cities of anyone they wish for any reason they wish. So to threaten that upon someone is totally fine and not against the rules. Stukahh
|
|||
|
I don't always drink. But when I do, I prefer the blood of my enemies.
|
|||
|
|||
|
lorre
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jun 2010 Location: Groot Kortrijk Status: Offline Points: 446 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Sep 2017 at 18:39 |
||
how many requests have you had that end in or else. also this "request" is to go through ingame mails. this is not a voluntary sharing
|
|||
|
The battlefield is a scene of constant chaos. The winner will be the one who controls that chaos, both his own and the enemies.
Napoleon Bonaparte |
|||
|
|||
|
Gragnog
Postmaster 
Joined: 28 Nov 2011 Status: Offline Points: 598 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Sep 2017 at 17:47 |
||
|
Well Lore, I am guessing it is a request for sitter rights, and only the account owner can nominate sitters, thus if someone does not like the request or disagrees with the request they can refuse. Its not like anyone can force you to appoint a sitter. Get over it and stop trying to make things more than they are. Perhaps if you played more actively instead of trolling the forums you might be able to help these people so so desperately seem to be trying to help in the forums.
|
|||
|
Kaggen is my human half
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fiona
Wordsmith
Joined: 02 Jul 2014 Status: Offline Points: 139 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Sep 2017 at 17:12 |
||
|
Love whiners hehe
|
|||
|
|||
|
lorre
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jun 2010 Location: Groot Kortrijk Status: Offline Points: 446 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Sep 2017 at 17:02 |
||
|
i wonder what the devs think of a demand for sitter rights to see mails and such. pretty sure that breaks some kinda privacy
|
|||
|
The battlefield is a scene of constant chaos. The winner will be the one who controls that chaos, both his own and the enemies.
Napoleon Bonaparte |
|||
|
|||
|
Spartacus
New Poster 
Joined: 15 Sep 2017 Location: Ireland Status: Offline Points: 33 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Sep 2017 at 16:38 |
||
There's video ????
|
|||
|
|||
|
Eresh
Greenhorn
Joined: 15 Apr 2017 Location: WV, USA Status: Offline Points: 64 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Sep 2017 at 16:33 |
||
It's not up to your enemies to build less troops, it's up to you to build more troops. You are the only person on Illyriad responsible for building your own defense. You are also the only one on Illyriad responsible for picking the alliance you chose to join. Your alliance declared war knowing it was a training alliance and knowing it couldn't fight the target and knowing it couldn't defend any of it's members in said fight. The problem is on you and your alliance, not people your side declared war on.
If the goal was to remove everyone from the game that there's no challenge to remove, then there'd be about 10 people in the game. You're not special, you're just earlier in line than the next guy in your alliance member list due to bad luck, placement, or karma for something you did in a past life ;)
You're not new! 9 months old is not new! You aren't being removed from the game by anyone. Only you can make you quit the game.
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ten Kulch
Postmaster
Joined: 20 Jan 2017 Location: Fellandire Status: Offline Points: 678 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Sep 2017 at 16:28 |
||
Momentarily ignoring the absurdity of war deserters self-declaring "civilian" status for their own convenience, the disparity is justified because: 1. nobody has actually agreed to the Geneva Convention in Illyriad, and 2. Illyriad is a video game, not reality. Edited by Ten Kulch - 20 Sep 2017 at 16:29 |
|||
|
Check out my blog, Warmongering in Illyriad for self-defense techniques, military city construction, and PvP strategies.
|
|||
|
|||
|
Post Reply
|
Page <12345 7> |
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
Stukahh wrote: