H? attacks upon me

some random guy wrote: Hammy was given 5 chances to behave- all of which he blew, spamming global chat and being a complete management nightmare.  He left the game by his own choice, and I sieged him 3 weeks after he left so new players could move to our alliance capital (he had jumped from alliance to alliance at an average of 2 per week and eventually created his own alliance - Coolies).  I left his second city standing, so that he could restart if he wanted to.  And I don't believe you understand diplomacy- its very essence is about making more friends than enemies, and those who are decent players will quickly develop a large friend base who will come to their aid if necessary. Â

The agreement you had hammy agree to was a scam. You made sure the rules hammy agreed to would be impossible for him or her to accomplish. You were just better off just sieging the towns. And no, you attacked hammy several times and did not wait till he or she quit. You were very bitter the player was alliance hopping and left your alliance. You took that very personal and no matter how many apologies, you wanted to end hammy with your new siege tech that you had just developed at that time.

this forum was about attila getting attacked,Lionz what does hammy have to do with anything here?

Gemley wrote: this forum was about attila getting attacked,Lionz what does hammy have to do with anything here?

Well my replies are based on what he said on his review. Hammy was just a mere example I used to explain what I was talking about about contracts and such.

Yes, ATH can simply change the title name to "my review of the game."

Attila wrote: It has de generated itself

LH is degenerating Attilas posts...
I'd call that Niveau-Limbo  

The agreement I made hammy agree to was for his own protection- I know for a fact that many other players were getting fed up with his rude outbursts.  The conditions were as follows- 50 of each advanced resource (not including siege blocks), no more spamming of Global Chat, and to settle in one alliance (I did not specify that it had to be mine).  #1 is easy for a 1000 population player to accomplish (It was easy for him), and #2 is also easy.  #3 he accomplished by creating Coolies.  Remember, this was the 5th warning I had given him, so it had to have a consequence to make him understand that what he was doing was not okay.  Hammy broke this agreement when he attacked me and waylander for sieging a couple of his friends (who were not in his alliance) over Global Chat.  Both of these sieges were for relocation purposes, they didn't harm the players (who were both inactive).  I sent 1 army to attack him, and informed him that he had broken our agreement.  He then went inactive.  Remember Lionz, when you don't know what happened it's best to keep quiet (I do it all the time, you will note the absence of my posts in various grudge threads scattered throughout the forums).