Gul'Dan and Storm |
Post Reply 
|
Page 12> |
| Author | ||
Sir A 
Wordsmith 
Joined: 26 Sep 2012 Status: Offline Points: 121 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: Gul'Dan and StormPosted: 31 Jan 2016 at 18:08 |
|
Why send sieges when you can get someone to destroy their own cities for you. Stop hitting yourself
  |
||
 |
||
|
Gul'Dan
Greenhorn 
Joined: 28 Nov 2014 Location: Lan Losh Status: Offline Points: 86 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Jan 2016 at 07:14 |
|
You have not even landed a siege as of yet Pellinell. Razed, razing... Makes no difference. Hasn't happened yet. No matter! Thanks for the laugh KP! Edited by Gul'Dan - 30 Jan 2016 at 07:15 |
||
|
||
|
||
|
Mr Damage
Postmaster 
Joined: 01 Jan 2011 Status: Offline Points: 598 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Jan 2016 at 00:13 |
|
I like him.
|
||
|
||
|
Pellinell
Forum Warrior
Joined: 08 Apr 2012 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 298 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Jan 2016 at 21:53 |
|
|
"Is razing" is present not past tense.
|
||
|
||
|
Gul'Dan
Greenhorn
Joined: 28 Nov 2014 Location: Lan Losh Status: Offline Points: 86 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Jan 2016 at 21:49 |
|
States it right there. Edited by Gul'Dan - 29 Jan 2016 at 21:49 |
||
|
|
||
|
||
|
Pellinell
Forum Warrior
Joined: 08 Apr 2012 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 298 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Jan 2016 at 21:43 |
|
|
Gul'Dan I don't recall claiming to have razed you. You've exoed your cities and my troops hate marching for 3 days and turning around.
|
||
|
||
|
Pellinell
Forum Warrior
Joined: 08 Apr 2012 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 298 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Jan 2016 at 21:37 |
|
|
Jane, no where have we said we were a peaceful alliance. In fact it says on our profile that we are a military oriented alliance...and the obvious, I'm the leader.
Your information with regard to Shark and taking Picos cities is not remotely accurate to the reality of the situation. However I know it's the general concensus and so it's not your fault. The reality however is we didn't "take" Picos cities. Instead we and Shark came to an agreement on them. Takuilrue joining Storm was because he was a newb in trouble. Not to start a war with an alliance that's already losing one . If I wanted war with Shark I'd declare war . deception isn't my style ;) As to our labeling him a spy. He joined Storm for nefarious reasons. He a known trouble maker with extensive history. If I let him off he's lost nothing and learned nothing. So you see I'm actually helping him. I know I know I'm a nice guy :) |
||
|
||
|
Gul'Dan
Greenhorn
Joined: 28 Nov 2014 Location: Lan Losh Status: Offline Points: 86 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Jan 2016 at 21:36 |
|
|
Now, now Pellinell! Storm hasn't landed one single siege on Gul'dan or Kaos Cowboy. Storm couldn't take any credit away for the fun & sieges used to destroy myself.
If anyone would like to see all the raze reports on myself please contact me. I could even provide screenshots or the raze reports! As Jane Darkmagic stated, it's obvious my reputation follows where ever I go. Hurting players and causing judgement upon them in my presence. With that, I've decided to leave the game and destroy myself. Storms terms were only a catalyst. Kind Regards, Edited by Gul'Dan - 29 Jan 2016 at 21:53 |
||
|
|
||
|
||
|
Jane DarkMagic
Postmaster
Joined: 10 Sep 2011 Location: Tennessee Status: Offline Points: 554 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Jan 2016 at 18:21 |
|
|
Furthermore, calling someone a spy for not disclosing their past accounts is weak. There is no proof that Gul'Dan was reporting any information about STORM to anyone else. So sieging him in the name of "spying" is also very weak.
|
||
|
||
|
Jane DarkMagic
Postmaster
Joined: 10 Sep 2011 Location: Tennessee Status: Offline Points: 554 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Jan 2016 at 18:14 |
|
|
It is just more shocking to me that STORM would be sieging a player they took in because they wanted to challenge SHARK over Pico's cities. The fact that it was Gul'Dan does not detract from their initial motive of forcing SHARK to put up or shut up. If STORM didn't want to challenge SHARK they wouldn't have taken in any random player sieging Pico's cities. So I don't think that Gul'Dan deserves any blame in this situation except for causing drama, which is hardly a newb-ringable offense. You will likely get away with it though because no one likes Gul'Dan for other reasons in no way related to him sieging Pico's cities.
|
||
|
||
|
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
Gul'Dan wrote: