Grandpa... tell us about the war |
Post Reply
|
Page <12345 7> |
| Author | ||
Daefis
Wordsmith
Joined: 05 Aug 2011 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 128 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 Feb 2014 at 16:19 |
|
And futile since you had already geared up for war and were going to have it regardless. Anyway this is rehashing old news but belittling Jasche over a year after he was driven out of the game isn't very becoming. |
||
![]() |
||
KillerPoodle
Postmaster General
Joined: 23 Feb 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 Feb 2014 at 15:51 |
|
|
You're still missing both points.
Sending troops to get a new alliance involved in a war is an escalation, regardless of what those troops are going to do. Had it been a smaller and less scary alliance there would have been no attempts at diplomacy. Jasche's attempts were too little, too late and for the wrong reasons. |
||
|
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM
"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill |
||
![]() |
||
Daefis
Wordsmith
Joined: 05 Aug 2011 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 128 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 Feb 2014 at 14:44 |
|
|
KP you're being selective in your memories again I'm afraid. Jasche's mail was very clear that the only action was to clear sieges nothing more and you know this. Unfortunately it had become apparent even at this point that it was a set up by H? to instigate a war as HM has now been good to confirm to everyone in another thread.
Jasche made attempts at diplomacy with H? and was consistently rebuffed, patronised or simply ignored for his efforts. H? engineered the situation and Jasche had no way of dufusing a situation that was already scripted and in progress.
|
||
![]() |
||
KillerPoodle
Postmaster General
Joined: 23 Feb 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 Feb 2014 at 14:21 |
|
|
Not sure why gossip and shadar are so set on dredging up the past but whatever.
I don't think so. Firstly because I do not recall ever saying anything of the sort (but I don't claim perfect recall so feel free to refresh my memory with some proof). Second, from the very beginning H? is one of the few alliances who truly understood that the moment you put your diplos and troops out there you are opening yourself up to a response regardless of how "right" you think you are. It doesn't mean you have to agree with the response, but it's always a possibility. This is something Consone and Jasche never "got".
And nope again. Jasche himself sent out an IGM on Oct 11th to VIC stating that any members were free to send troops to get involved in the RHY/ABSA war. He did this without any attempt to discuss diplomacy with RHY (FYI that makes him a worse diplomat than Sir Brad - who did send a message before sending troops). The only reason he later tried to recall that order was when he realised the size of what he'd stepped in. Had it been a smaller and less able alliance than H? he would have continued with his casual/thoughtless escalation and Consone would have rumbled onward. The fact that that kind of brainless escalation was hard coded into Consone's constitution enabled instant bullying of smaller alliances who tried to stand up to them, and is one of the reasons Consone was a ill executed idea from the start. FYI - I allowed Jasche to call my bluff in public because I did not want him to know how good our intel was, but the fact is, we knew he was the one who pulled the trigger to send VIC troops into battle and that his only reason to recant was because he was scared of H? rather than some higher peaceful ambition. |
||
|
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM
"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill |
||
![]() |
||
Angrim
Postmaster General
Joined: 02 Nov 2011 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 1173 |
Post Options
Thanks(2)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 Feb 2014 at 20:31 |
|
|
it would be a shame to see this thread derailed because players cannot keep to the topic. there are about a hundred other forum topics in which the warring sides can accuse one another of misdeeds, misrepresentations and half-truths.
|
||
![]() |
||
Shadar Logoth
Wordsmith
Joined: 03 Mar 2010 Status: Offline Points: 127 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 Feb 2014 at 19:55 |
|
|
KP ... there have been many inconsistencies in your claims over time. (Btw I remember HM mentioning how consistent H? was... )
I am to tired to keep summing them up. But here we go again for at least 2 of them. First... Breaking sieges was never considered an offensive action by H?(and by it's "allies", would use other words but trying to keep calm and not resort to offensive words) .... .... off course, when it suited you best and you could do the breaking in the past. When Invictus send in troops to break sieges, (read point one, NOT offensive) H? warned VIC that it was considered an offensive action... how weird? Second... Jasche, the one you keep trying to pull down, but the one who has also always been the most CONSISTENT player to be called true to his word, actually called back all attacks against those sieges, even when most of invictus players hated doing so. See... we do stand by our friends. (Something you and yours so loudly applauded when it benefited you. But suddenly it was something considered evil and offensive. ) How bold you and yours were saying that confeds not standing by their friends were not worth their money... Consone did that, stood by it's confeds and they broke sieges, they DID NOT initiate sieges. Cry foul play all you want... Inconsistency two! Even when Jasche ordered it, and we didn't like his orders, all attacks were kept back after that. And you, being so militairy oriented knew that attacks launched could not be called back. All you had to say to that was "well... they could have been send in after the call went out". I have to admit.... Jasche called your bluff, and you miserably failed at meeting it.... If I had still been leader of Invictus you would indeed have managed to goad me into the war you wanted all along. Not with Jasche... But you wanted that war, ... it was evident from the beginning. And if Consone/Jasche was willing to go this far... what then??? ... If you had accepted what he had offered then you would have never been able to pull off your precious war again. So you had to go forward even though the foundations of it were failing beneath your feet as it happened. Gratz, you won.... for a while (hmmmm this sounds familiar?) Sorry... two points where you lost my respect. And two points where I had my eyes on the whole situation. I don't mind people who actually roleplay. If they ARE really roleplaying and not just hiding behind it to insult people. I also don't mind people who are honest enough to say "I am just in it for the war". What I do mind is alliances such as H? claiming time and time again that they are not the aggressors. If you want to play that card try to give it at least a LOT more effort or don't come up with cheap tricks/lies like this. Truelly.... these were only 2 of the things that really made me lose my respect for H? .... Not even going to go into all the other times. (edited for spelling errors, was to angry when i posted this, and still am) Edited by Shadar Logoth - 23 Feb 2014 at 20:29 |
||
|
More Orc, less talking!
All that is said is my own opinion. I am not a leader nor voice for Invictus. I will always abide by Invictus's rules. |
||
![]() |
||
KillerPoodle
Postmaster General
Joined: 23 Feb 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 Feb 2014 at 15:50 |
|
Troll. Vic issued a recall of tourney troops on the 7th Oct and had troops in motion towards the siege on the 9th/10th Oct. Much less than a week after hostilities started. Maybe you should take your own advice. |
||
|
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM
"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill |
||
![]() |
||
Malek
Forum Warrior
Joined: 09 Jul 2012 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 247 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 Feb 2014 at 13:15 |
|
30 Day Research, ouch no need for sabo attacks on that one. As to counterclaiming, I could not agree more. I have seen numerous instances since the pause of it where counterclaiming could have made a difference. This being one, The NC town exoing into the middle of NAAM towns another. I think Amporphias did it as well in the MM area, not quite sure on that one. |
||
![]() |
||
Deranzin
Postmaster
Joined: 10 Oct 2011 Status: Offline Points: 845 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 Feb 2014 at 13:04 |
|
Yes ... if we want to be totally correct I should have written "had been holding"
Please do explain me that reasoning if you have some time ... ![]() Because as far as I know there has never been an example of a power struggle "just for the fun of it" ... someone eventually WILL have to fill in the shoes of the people that vacated them ... and more often than not, the more obscure and dubious the line of "succession" is, the more trouble that spells towards stability (numerous historical examples of that) as a whole. |
||
![]() Just like a "before and after" ad ! ahahahaah :p |
||
![]() |
||
Nokigon
Postmaster General
Player Council - Historian Joined: 07 Nov 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1452 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 Feb 2014 at 10:01 |
|
I dunno, I would say that the siege of 05 couldn't have been handled more effectively by us. The small attacks meant that we got a nearly 2:1 kill ratio- 40k troops to kill 70k. You may disagree with these figures, my records are haphazard. 05 and 04 were both supposed to be exodused as they were next to mountains and had troops on said mountain. The only reason 05 wasn't exodused was because of a 30d research queue (I know.). So you were kinda lucky then. Your town that you exodused was a great example of why we need counterclaiming back. Without counterclaiming we were more or less powerless to stop you. However, since I was pretty sure you wanted us to put a siege there because of the building (we already knew about your stals) I didn't bother sieging. We just hit it with some troops and blockaded it. The Hyo op taught us to be a lot more careful with our RT. The operation put our RT capabilities back by an annoyingly large amount. Luckily we were able to return the favour when we took out your 120cats and 4k stals.
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page <12345 7> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |