| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
StJude 
Postmaster
Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 568
|
 Posted: 27 Sep 2011 at 20:40 |
 Createure wrote:
Createure wrote:
anyone can twist anything that someone else says to further their own argument |
See what I did there? 
Honestly mate I just have your best interests at heart - I don't want you to be the last one left standing in here alone. 
|
nah man, knowing Harmless, I won't be standing in here alone, there will be 5 other dudes standing against me.
See what I did there?
|
 |
Createure
Postmaster General
Joined: 07 Apr 2010
Location: uk
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: 27 Sep 2011 at 20:39 |
Createure wrote:
anyone can twist anything that someone else says to further their own argument |
See what I did there? Honestly mate I just have your best interests at heart - I don't want you to be the last one left standing in here alone.
|
|
StJude
Postmaster
Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 568
|
Posted: 27 Sep 2011 at 20:35 |
Createure wrote:
Hey there.
Did you guys perhaps consider that no one is bothering to counter your ineffable logic not because they have no answer, but because they simply can't be bothered?
This thread is very long now - and it goes hand-in-hand with some other very long threads - none of the arguments are new, we're just going round in circles. Most people just want to get on with the war, or watching the war, and really can't be bothered with this back-and-forward anymore...
Because at the end of the day - anyone can twist anything that someone else says to further their own argument when you're using 'forum logic'.
|
Your Majesty,
I had in fact thought of this, but the fact that you even have to suggest this is counter enough to what you are even proposing.
If no-one cares, why did you care, to tell us that "maybe" no one cares? You seem to.
|
|
Createure
Postmaster General
Joined: 07 Apr 2010
Location: uk
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: 27 Sep 2011 at 20:32 |
StJude wrote:
You seem to be using the "OH NOES, I R BEIN' TROLLED" route to avoid the direct questions. Which is alright with me, it helps reinforce the point I am making. |
Dakota Strider wrote:
I have made what I have thought have been
excellent points, that just get ignored by the other side, because they
have no valid counter for them.
On the bright side, it seems we are winning the argument, if not the war. |
Hey there. Did you guys perhaps consider that no one is bothering to counter your ineffable logic not because they have no answer, but because they simply can't be bothered? This thread is very long now - and it goes hand-in-hand with some other very long threads - none of the arguments are new, we're just going round in circles. Most people just want to get on with the war, or watching the war, and really can't be bothered with this back-and-forward anymore... Because at the end of the day - anyone can twist anything that someone else says to further their own argument when you're using 'forum logic'.
|
|
StJude
Postmaster
Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 568
|
Posted: 27 Sep 2011 at 20:32 |
Dakota Strider wrote:
StJude, I know the feeling. I have made what I have thought have been excellent points, that just get ignored by the other side, because they have no valid counter for them. They look at any hint of name calling, or any other such device and direct their attention only to that. The sad thing, usually those comments were made to try to lighten the mood a bit. At least that was my perception when I read yours.
On the bright side, it seems we are winning the argument, if not the war.
|
Judging from this thread, H? is failing at their PR campaign in all of this.
Other than the aggressors going after VALAR, a lot of the smaller alliances and players are now questioning why it takes 5 alliances to fight 1 if this is all "Harmless" Fun? (CWHUTIDIDTHAR?)
I definitely have a style that is tongue in cheek, but Kumo takes things too personally and gets all bent out of shape. That said, I have no problem admitting I said certain things to get a rise out of him. Shows those following the thread that there is definitely emotion in this from H?'s side, regardless of what they say.
The PvP argument put forward by H? is clearly a ploy as far as I am concerned, and that is why neither you, I or anyone else questioning the H? will get any answers.
I'm gonna go back to seeing if I can kick some Champs ass while all this is happening.
Like Celeb and others, I like the underdog, you guys in VALAR are clearly that now. Way more fun when you actually have to think in your PvP as opposed to mindlessly zerg your opponent with an endless supply of replaceable troops.
|
|
Kurfist
Postmaster
Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 824
|
Posted: 27 Sep 2011 at 20:31 |
|
If I would have made a comment about you in general I would have put your name and then a comment.
Like Harry, "text here"
|
|
Patience is a virtue, resource giving is a sin
|
|
(EOM) Harry
Forum Warrior
Joined: 06 Oct 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 283
|
Posted: 27 Sep 2011 at 20:30 |
|
Kurfie baby, was that a comment about me?
|
|
Fool's watch the land when the problem is in the heart.
|
|
Kurfist
Postmaster
Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 824
|
Posted: 27 Sep 2011 at 20:20 |
|
I think it's hypocritical to be against troll players and trollers on the forum, then troll people that make comments that you don't agree with..
|
|
Patience is a virtue, resource giving is a sin
|
|
Dakota Strider
Greenhorn
Joined: 03 May 2011
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 62
|
Posted: 27 Sep 2011 at 20:05 |
StJude wrote:
[QUOTE=Kumomoto]
[QUOTE=StJude]
You do realize there is more to both my posts than what you keep focusing on and quoting, right?
You seem to be using the "OH NOES, I R BEIN' TROLLED" route to avoid the direct questions. Which is alright with me, it helps reinforce the point I am making. |
StJude, I know the feeling. I have made what I have thought have been excellent points, that just get ignored by the other side, because they have no valid counter for them. They look at any hint of name calling, or any other such device and direct their attention only to that. The sad thing, usually those comments were made to try to lighten the mood a bit. At least that was my perception when I read yours. On the bright side, it seems we are winning the argument, if not the war.
|
|
(EOM) Harry
Forum Warrior
Joined: 06 Oct 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 283
|
Posted: 27 Sep 2011 at 19:52 |
|
Lulz at Jude thinking that through out all of these posts, he's making a blind bit of difference or opinion shaping.
|
|
Fool's watch the land when the problem is in the heart.
|
|
Tweet
Game On