| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
Mr Damage 
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 598
|
 Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 10:31 |
|
Correct, the 150 was between 2 alliances White and Black.
|
 |
Sovereign
Greenhorn
Joined: 20 May 2011
Location: TEXAS
Status: Offline
Points: 43
|
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 08:33 |
 Mr Damage wrote:
From the day I started playing this game, I took note that the top alliance had around 50 members, alliances 2 and 3 had around 150 members, it was clear even then that H were doing things more effectively than others, things have not changed since then clearly. |
Just to clarify one of your points, the member cap for alliances is 100. ~Sov~
|
|
Sgt..Shanks
Greenhorn
Joined: 20 Nov 2010
Location: BRITAIN
Status: Offline
Points: 56
|
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 08:22 |
|
If anybody thinks they are taking a legendary city because a long term, peaceful player sent a few lousy troops to help an old friend out (who was also peaceful) ~They can think again!!
|
|
Mr Damage
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 598
|
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 06:33 |
|
Whilst we have clearly had differences in opinion ( some seem to still be arguing over those both verbally and militarily), I congratulate H on their achievements. From the day I started playing this game, I took note that the top alliance had around 50 members, alliances 2 and 3 had around 150 members, it was clear even then that H were doing things more effectively than others, things have not changed since then clearly. All that has changed is my amount of knowledge ingame and my understanding of how H achieve their goals, some will claim it is dirty handed, others (judging by H's successful methods) meaning the majority, accept it as fair play. Again well done and lets look forward to the next however many months of peacetime until the factions are released and they take us all out.
Edited by Mr Damage - 07 Oct 2011 at 06:50
|
|
Brids17
Postmaster General
Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483
|
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 02:03 |
HonoredMule wrote:
Most importantly, we take particular offense at players who have joined Valar from other non-confederated alliances just to unload their entire arsenal on us then fled like cowards to neutral alliances. These players shall each lose a city regardless of who tries to harbor or protect them. Do so at your own risk. |
Any chance you can shed some light on which of MoreBlue4U2's cities you'll be sieging?
|
|
|
|
Daufer
Forum Warrior
Joined: 14 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 332
|
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 01:29 |
Celebcalen wrote:
Pathetic little brown noser
|
Now you see why he was so successful as our diplomat in Havoc Unleashed?
|
|
Sister Nikki
Greenhorn
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 76
|
Posted: 06 Oct 2011 at 23:27 |
|
well spoken HM :)
p.s. Celeb your voice may be active, but i see your account suspended :)
|
|
Sovereign
Greenhorn
Joined: 20 May 2011
Location: TEXAS
Status: Offline
Points: 43
|
Posted: 06 Oct 2011 at 20:33 |
Celebcalen wrote:
The_Dude wrote:
Thanks for the update, HM. |
Pathetic little brown noser
|
As per usual, you add constructive feedback. We should all be so thankful that you truly contribute so much to the content of the forums. I know I for one feel lucky. Thank you oh great and mighty one! Hmm, was that a bit over the top? Ah well, I think the point is there none the less. ~SOV~
|
|
Celebcalen
Forum Warrior
Joined: 18 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 288
|
Posted: 06 Oct 2011 at 19:25 |
The_Dude wrote:
Thanks for the update, HM. |
Pathetic little brown noser 
|
|
nvp33
Wordsmith
Joined: 17 Oct 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 124
|
Posted: 06 Oct 2011 at 19:20 |
|
Well played HM and H? Congratz on your win.
|
|
Tweet
Game Off
