| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
Brids17 
Postmaster General
Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483
|
 Posted: 08 Oct 2011 at 06:33 |
 Sgt..Shanks wrote:
Why do you all call DEFENSE, attacking?
Breaking a siege IS NOT an ATTACK! |
Defense, attack, call it what you will. He still ran to WE the moment he realized he may see some retaliation.
|
|
|
 |
Sgt..Shanks
Greenhorn
Joined: 20 Nov 2010
Location: BRITAIN
Status: Offline
Points: 56
|
Posted: 08 Oct 2011 at 06:02 |
Rill wrote:
StJude, I believe people are attacking Blue because he joined an alliance for a war, attacked siege camps, then sought to avoid consequences for his actions by leaving that alliance. You may not agree with it as a reason, but it is a reason.
|
Why do you all call DEFENSE, attacking? Breaking a siege IS NOT an ATTACK!
|
|
Starry
Postmaster
Joined: 20 Mar 2010
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 612
|
Posted: 08 Oct 2011 at 04:53 |
ugofirst wrote:
thankyou for replying honored mule, but blue didnt launch any attacks at H? did he? |
Yes, he sent many attacks at H?, you and RMY have been told this several times in global, however, you continue to miss the point, his behavior and lack honor of in this the war have earned our attacks. He cannot buy his way out of this; you cannot buy his way out of it either. Now I have to question why you and RMY continue to question our attacks and insist on trying to protect MoreBlue, what are your motives?
|
|
CEO, Harmless?
Founder of Toothless?
"Truth never dies."
-HonoredMule
|
|
Kumomoto
Postmaster General
Joined: 19 Oct 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 2224
|
Posted: 08 Oct 2011 at 04:41 |
|
SJ--Blue did attack H? Forces... Also, I'm a little sick of anti-h campaigns from the same folks who were screaming to the world that we were going to "exterminate" Valar... Can people please get some perspective &, even if you don't like H?, give H? Some credit for halting a war at some five or so cities razed? That's not even a drop in the Valar bucket! Super restraint showed! So... Good winners have demonstrated themselves thus, & I wish good (relatively unscathed) losers would do similarly...
|
|
Mr Damage
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 598
|
Posted: 08 Oct 2011 at 02:55 |
|
You guys make me chuckle.
|
|
StJude
Postmaster
Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 568
|
Posted: 08 Oct 2011 at 02:37 |
Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote:
StJude wrote:
In a game.....no "punishment" should ever be needed. Unless you are playing for all the wrong reasons. |
Replace 'punishment' with 'consequence' then if it makes you feel better.
Attempting to argue 'attacking someone who attacked you' is not justified is, no matter your spin, ridiculous and a lost cause.
But you keep bangin' your head there pal. Matters little to us.
|
Replace attack with siege if it makes you feel....nevermind.
Keep up the positive PR!
|
|
Llyorn Of Jaensch
Postmaster
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Status: Offline
Points: 924
|
Posted: 08 Oct 2011 at 02:22 |
StJude wrote:
In a game.....no "punishment" should ever be needed. Unless you are playing for all the wrong reasons. |
Replace 'punishment' with 'consequence' then if it makes you feel better. Attempting to argue 'attacking someone who attacked you' is not justified is, no matter your spin, ridiculous and a lost cause. But you keep bangin' your head there pal. Matters little to us.
|
|
"ouch...best of luck."
HonoredMule
|
|
StJude
Postmaster
Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 568
|
Posted: 08 Oct 2011 at 02:02 |
Rill wrote:
StJude, I believe people are attacking Blue because he joined an alliance for a war, attacked siege camps, then sought to avoid consequences for his actions by leaving that alliance. You may not agree with it as a reason, but it is a reason.
Not sure what the "game" remark came from ... can you clarify your reasoning? |
The game remark comes from the fact, that Illy is a game.
If we all got together and played monopoly, and I won, and you lost, I have two options.
1.) Win graciously
2.) Rub it in your face.
In this game, I would prefer H? just admitted they are choosing option 2 and rubbing it in the face of the players who chose the losing side instead of coming up with "justifications" for their behaviour.
In a game.....no "punishment" should ever be needed. Unless you are playing for all the wrong reasons.
I would hope that while we have EXTREMELY opposing philosophies on how Illy should be played, that we could both agree that it is 1.) a game and 2.) supposed to be fun.
I suppose that is the extent I take the sandbox too.
Edited by StJude - 08 Oct 2011 at 02:05
|
|
Sgt..Shanks
Greenhorn
Joined: 20 Nov 2010
Location: BRITAIN
Status: Offline
Points: 56
|
Posted: 08 Oct 2011 at 01:33 |
|
OMG.. This has turned into the "kiss arse" thread!!!!
|
|
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
|
Posted: 08 Oct 2011 at 01:14 |
StJude, I believe people are attacking Blue because he joined an alliance for a war, attacked siege camps, then sought to avoid consequences for his actions by leaving that alliance. You may not agree with it as a reason, but it is a reason.
Not sure what the "game" remark came from ... can you clarify your reasoning?
|
|
Tweet
Game Off
