| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
Sovereign 
Greenhorn
Joined: 20 May 2011
Location: TEXAS
Status: Offline
Points: 43
|
 Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 08:33 |
 Mr Damage wrote:
From the day I started playing this game, I took note that the top alliance had around 50 members, alliances 2 and 3 had around 150 members, it was clear even then that H were doing things more effectively than others, things have not changed since then clearly. |
Just to clarify one of your points, the member cap for alliances is 100. ~Sov~
|
 |
Mr Damage
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 598
|
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 10:31 |
|
Correct, the 150 was between 2 alliances White and Black.
|
|
ugofirst
New Poster
Joined: 20 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 11
|
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 10:48 |
congratulations to H? on their emphatic victory over Valar,
a magnanimous gesture, if the war IS finished, would be for a line to
be drawn under it so that all can now continue with the game peacefully
revenge attacks can only serve to prolong unwanted hostilities - and
could even extend them to include heretofore peaceful players
the power of H? is evident, perhaps now is the time to show their forebearance too
|
|
Mr Damage
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 598
|
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 11:59 |
|
I think everyone sees the pattern now.
|
|
Brids17
Postmaster General
Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483
|
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 13:56 |
Sgt..Shanks wrote:
If anybody thinks they are taking a legendary city because a long term, peaceful player sent a few lousy troops to help an old friend out (who was also peaceful) ~They can think again!!
|
I can't believe you continue to defend a player who is clearly deserving of punishment. I don't care what you say RMY, you trying to protect Blue is no better than VALAR trying to protect Roller. He's going to lose one city and rightfully so and I don't see a tiny 500 pop city that took him a week to build being it.
|
|
|
|
Ander
Postmaster General
Joined: 24 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1269
|
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 14:41 |
Brids17 wrote:
Sgt..Shanks wrote:
If anybody thinks they are taking a legendary city because a long term, peaceful player sent a few lousy troops to help an old friend out (who was also peaceful) ~They can think again!!
|
I can't believe you continue to defend a player who is clearly deserving of punishment. I don't care what you say RMY, you trying to protect Blue is no better than VALAR trying to protect Roller. He's going to lose one city and rightfully so and I don't see a tiny 500 pop city that took him a week to build being it.
|
I don't see how someone who helped out an old friend is 'deserving of punishment'. They are certainly less 'deserving of punishment' than those players who ganged upon peaceful players for the sin of being 'strategic assets of Valar'.
If the war proved anything, it is that most players in the community are peaceful not because they are kindly by nature, but because they are afraid to take risks. When they got an opportunity to make attacks without fearing retaliation, they all came in packs to snatch something from Valar. For someone like me who always opposed the Valar leadership for being mildly offensive, this came as a shocking revelation. Curse and mCrow deserves some respect - they made their goals clear and stopped the offenses as soon as the enemy surrendered.
Revenge attacks on people who helped Valar will extend the hostilities and weaken the morale of the community. Why is it so difficult to show some kindness when you have already won the war?
|
|
Uther
New Poster
Joined: 14 Mar 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 16
|
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 15:12 |
Weaken the morale of the community? For pity's sake.
This community must be a bunch of weak at the knees people. Geez, folks, was there a nuclear war here? Did entire alliances get wiped from the map? Did I miss some reports or were there only a couple of cities impacted by this? Barely anyone got blooded... and those that did, barely got hurt.
Suck it up people. Grow a pair. Don't like what H? or Valar or whoever is doing... stop crying in your cheerios about it. Do something. Organize... get together and build a cohesive group to take them on. It can be done.
The cowardice and rank timidness shown here is pathetic.
Edited by Uther - 07 Oct 2011 at 15:19
|
|
Celebcalen
Forum Warrior
Joined: 18 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 288
|
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 15:45 |
|
|
|
StJude
Postmaster
Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 568
|
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 16:15 |
HonoredMule wrote:
These players shall each lose a city regardless of who tries to harbor or protect them. Do so at your own risk.
|
So, let me get this straight. You guys siege a player, these guys attack the siege.
Basically, they lose moving military pixels and you lose moving military pixels.
So, since you maybe lost more moving military pixels you feel you are now justified in taking cities?
How did you arrive at this conclusion?
Wouldn't it be more honorable and more importantly fair to ask for compensation in lost resources used to generate moving military pixels?
You guys should be ashamed of yourselves.
|
|
Kilotov of DokGthung
Postmaster
Joined: 07 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 723
|
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 at 16:20 |
|
why shall people be ashamed if told to feel shame by a shameless person?
|
|
Tweet
Game Off
