TVM - SHARK Conflict |
Post Reply | Page 123 11> |
Author | |
Halcyon
Forum Warrior Joined: 17 Aug 2012 Location: Israel Status: Offline Points: 360 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 14 Sep 2015 at 17:01 |
I would like to make it clear that the only reason for the current conflict in NewLands is that TVM has attacked SHRKr. Their pretext is that SHRKr towns have been placed inside their land claim.
The reason that I'm making this statement is that another land claiming alliance -Roman Empire - has already scouted a SHARK town and I can only assume that they are planning to join TVM's aggression against us. At this time and before major damage is caused, SHARK has only one demand of TVM and RE: alt your aggression. To any others contemplating support of TVM and RE's aggression: Please don't. Halcyon for Dark and Darker Shade.
Edited by Halcyon - 14 Sep 2015 at 17:19 |
|
Auraya
Postmaster Joined: 17 Nov 2011 Status: Offline Points: 527 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I would be interested to see the towns in question and their placement. Putting a town in the middle of a densely populated TVM area could be seen as an act of aggression. Conversely, attacking a town placed in an area sparsely populated by your alliance on the grounds of a 'land claim' seem ridiculous to me.
|
|
Stukahh
Forum Warrior Joined: 03 Feb 2015 Location: Fellandire, BL Status: Offline Points: 266 |
Post Options
Thanks(3)
|
TVM is a tiny alliance.
I am more concerned with Shark's aggression. Shark is 8 times the size of TVM. I admire them for standing up for what they believe is right. They must have a valid reason to do so. Sometimes you just have to fight even though the odds are stacked against you. So people shouldn't support TVM because you are requesting they don't? How about we lay the facts out on the table and let people think for themselves? I don't think the community should be told what to do. If you want to make this a public conversation we would be happy to hear both sides of the argument. Stukahh
|
|
I don't always drink. But when I do, I prefer the blood of my enemies.
|
|
Tacardi
New Poster Joined: 18 Sep 2012 Location: Mason, Michigan Status: Offline Points: 16 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
It always amazes me how someone (Halcyon) can twist what is really going on.
|
|
Belegar Ironhammer
Greenhorn Joined: 29 Mar 2014 Status: Offline Points: 91 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I suppose exo'ing cities laden with troops and placing them as close as possible to TVM towns doesn't count as aggression then.
|
|
Stukahh
Forum Warrior Joined: 03 Feb 2015 Location: Fellandire, BL Status: Offline Points: 266 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Screenshot above sent to me from Zenorra
|
|
I don't always drink. But when I do, I prefer the blood of my enemies.
|
|
Nokigon
Postmaster General Player Council - Historian Joined: 07 Nov 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1452 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Well, it would be fabulous to have some context here.
TVM have a land claim in Newlands, which Shark has been flouting for some time now. TVM have been remarkable candid in dealing with this, and recently Lorcan, part of TVM's leadership, offered to settle a settlement dispute with a member of Shark by offering a duel. This was accepted by the Shark member. However, Shark chose to intervene against Lorcan, violating the terms of a fair fight. Exactly how does that make TVM the aggressor?
|
|
Solanar
Forum Warrior Joined: 11 Jan 2015 Status: Offline Points: 312 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Given that TVM is part of DSD, I take the initial post to mean Shark is confident vs TVM but not against the entire DSD. Alternatively, it could be a cloaked continuation of the land claim war, and they are concerned about SIN coming out of Fortress Fellendire.
But maybe I'm just cynical.
|
|
Solanar
Forum Warrior Joined: 11 Jan 2015 Status: Offline Points: 312 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
However, to be fair, Halcyon said long ago (Posted: 05 Jul 2015 at 06:55)
Edited by Solanar - 14 Sep 2015 at 19:46 |
|
Auraya
Postmaster Joined: 17 Nov 2011 Status: Offline Points: 527 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
If a valid solution to the problem has already been found, and Shark have indeed chosen to violate the terms of this, I fail to see why this has made the forums at all. If you violate the terms, you forfeit the competition - assuming this agreement is in writing and can be backed up with reports. I am pretty sure this dispute can be sorted without the need for military actions. Just saying.
|
|
Post Reply | Page 123 11> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |