Sup?
I am interested in this idea and would like to nominate myself for the council.
Not only will I nominate myself I shall suggest a novel post for myself. One of the utmost importance that has yet to be considered.
The post is that of naysayer.
Today, due to the culture of style over substance the role of a naysayer is much maligned.
Historically they did not complain for the sake of it! They were recognised as an important check and balance to the powers that be. Let me elaborate...
In the day of lore a king/warlord/etc would have a court. The court would seek the favour of the boss man. As such any edict the top dog devised in his cups would be hailed as a work of genius.
This was less than conductive to the stabilty of the said main man as bad ideas went unchallenged causing issues down the line.
Now you do not get be the grand high pooh-bah by having a lack of smarts. This problem was recognised and addressed.
A naysayer was employed.
Thus if King Big Nob woke up with the stunning revelation that taxing big toes was the solution to his debt his court would say "hell yeah" in the hope of becoming the tax collector.
In steps the naysayer with a reality check, "If you tax big toes people are gunna chop em off - do you want an army that always falls over?"
Anyway, thats my pitch.
Also you may need to address the following...
THE THIN END OF THE WEDGE...DUH DUH DUH...
So the council is on a trial regarding lore, no impact on game play.
I have faith that lore would not be introduced giving X allaince +10 attack because they have a very weak arguement in favour of it.
However the posssibility remains, however small it may be, that council members may favour the agendas of their alliance or indeed those they hold personnal to themselves.
No matter how small this chance is it exists. Furthermore it will be used as a weapon against both the council members, their alliances and indeed the devs.
Are you read for this? Because it will happen, (me a naysayer...?), the truth of the matter will not be an issue.
In summary the council will be accused of vested interests whether they exist or not.
I applaud they gist of involving the player base. But is that not what the suggestions forum is for? I think the risk of bias inherrent in apointing a council if imagined or real is greater than the benefits. Especially as other ways of engaging the player base are available.
Special sloppt kisses,
M6