Peace Terms |
Post Reply | Page <1234 7> |
Author | |
Arctic55
Forum Warrior Joined: 26 Sep 2011 Status: Offline Points: 379 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I like these terms, but I would like to point out that the "38 billion" has probably already been spent in/during this war already. I would be awesome if the GA could refund some of it, but refunding it all is most likely not even possible.
|
|
KillerPoodle
Postmaster General Joined: 23 Feb 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks for the kind words. I added the surrender clause because it seems important to the GA and I wanted to make sure they know that I understand that. I posted it specifically in those terms because I had not yet cleared it with H? members but I felt like the entire post was important to get it out there ASAP - hence my disclaimer at the top. Fortunately my members are being very positive about it too so it looks like I will be able to make it clearly about the whole of H? as well as myself as their leader. |
|
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM
"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill |
|
KillerPoodle
Postmaster General Joined: 23 Feb 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Arctic - I appreciate you're trying to help but I would prefer if we could keep the speculation out of this and let those who actually know make the determination. Edited by KillerPoodle - 01 Jul 2014 at 20:37 |
|
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM
"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill |
|
Rupe
New Poster Joined: 04 Apr 2010 Location: Ch Status: Offline Points: 39 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
Is it just me? but it seems like H ask for gold when they win and want gold when they lose?
Hmmmm someones having a larf. Oh or is H paying back the gold to the losers of their wars part of the deal. 200 billion per alliance was it that H demanded and got Peeps dont be fooled by H propaganda machine |
|
Aurordan
Postmaster Player Council - Ambassador Joined: 21 Sep 2011 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 982 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hah, you had me going for a second there. I don't know if this was intended as satire, but if so you hit it out of the park.
|
|
Rupe
New Poster Joined: 04 Apr 2010 Location: Ch Status: Offline Points: 39 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Ooo and another thing.
When H win wars they demand the loss of leaders towns. They do not offer compensation to help rebuild |
|
KillerPoodle
Postmaster General Joined: 23 Feb 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Sad to say that Ditto refuses to consider the terms above and is now ranting at me for posting here (literally ranting) in a way that makes me think he hasn't even really read them.
If I were allowed to post IGM's in here a lot of folk would really understand why diplomacy failed when it was tried before the war. Rupe - the most we got from an alliance was 2 billion - most negotiated down to much less than that. On the other hand the most GA got from an alliance was ten times that much - 20 billion. They could repay half their haul and still be doing many times better than the Consone settlement and from fewer alliances. |
|
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM
"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill |
|
Aurordan
Postmaster Player Council - Ambassador Joined: 21 Sep 2011 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 982 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
He was probably pissed that you posted a hilarious mockery of a peace proposal that you knew was never going to be accepted in a public forum, and made private peace settlements public to boot. You probably should have seen that coming, honestly.
|
|
KillerPoodle
Postmaster General Joined: 23 Feb 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
That's because by the time everything was settled no one had lost more than 3 towns. In this war many have lost 5+ towns and in lots of cases people have lost everything. So the combination of much smaller losses and much smaller compensation payments meant not much assistance was required to rebuild - as evidenced by the EE war machine in this war. I have to say I expected some people would post this kind of pettiness and demonstrate their inability to consider the bigger picture - kinda sad to have that expectation fulfilled on this occasion though. |
|
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM
"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill |
|
KillerPoodle
Postmaster General Joined: 23 Feb 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
As I explained to him - he went AWOL for over a week with no reply to IGM and no hint of when he might return. In addition if you recall - Hath brought this to the public forum. When I did finally get a response today I offered to move the discussion elsewhere - it was ignored and the ranting continues. |
|
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM
"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill |
|
Post Reply | Page <1234 7> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |