account sitting and war

sigh

please stop all the personal attacks and stay on topic, lets share information on how to play the game

Arakamis wrote: I don't know what kind of a troll you are but if you had done half of what you did here in the site that i'm moderating, you would have several BFLs (ban for life) till now.

In my opinion, permasat accounts, in which a player controls more than two accounts, are of little benefit to an alliance in war.  The alliance would be better off with a competent player actively managing an account than with an account sat by someone who is trying to use six accounts.  Perhaps there are people who can play three, four or six accounts competently; I know I am not one of them.

It is my observation that perma-sat accounts are often used to start conflicts as they are considered "disposable" to the operator.  So, the perma-sat attacks someone and the alliance then kicks the perma-sat account or holds on to it depending on the response.  Perma-sat accounts also tend to be used as supply bases more than troop bases.  They will build armies over time, but they tend to be one-off uses and not regularly, diligently rebuilt (due to the player effort required).  Perma-sat cities are usually not defended by the active members of an alliance and will be allowed to fall to sieges easily.  Again, the result of little emotional investment from the operator.