| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
bansisdead 
Postmaster
Joined: 08 Jan 2012
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 609
|
 Posted: 06 Nov 2012 at 20:51 |
|
Aurordan, WE are bigger than their smaller opponents TCol, so I suggest you may need to practice your inference.
|
|
|
 |
Aurordan
Postmaster
Player Council - Ambassador
Joined: 21 Sep 2011
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 982
|
Posted: 06 Nov 2012 at 21:02 |
 bansisdead wrote:
Aurordan, WE are bigger than their smaller opponents TCol, so I suggest you may need to practice your inference.
|
I'm not quite sure what you mean by that. The relative sizes of the two alliances need not be inferred, they're pretty openly available information. So is the fact that WE was already at war with six alliances, and not holding up very well at all.
I will, however, follow your advice as best I can. You surely realized this, and yet deliberately made the deceptive statement that WE are larger than TCol, despite the fact that under the circumstances that is completely irrelevant. What I'm inferring here is that you have no intention of discussing this in good faith, but are simply spinning things as best you can to cover for your confederates in TCol. How's that?
|
|
bansisdead
Postmaster
Joined: 08 Jan 2012
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 609
|
Posted: 06 Nov 2012 at 21:21 |
|
Post deleted- The Gods advised me to refrain from posting on this irrelevant thread.
Edited by bansisdead - 06 Nov 2012 at 21:32
|
|
|
|
Aurordan
Postmaster
Player Council - Ambassador
Joined: 21 Sep 2011
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 982
|
Posted: 06 Nov 2012 at 21:34 |
bansisdead wrote:
Aurordan "How much of it is spent bragging of crushing victories against much smaller or already beleaguered opponents?"
ring any bells, you are inferring WE are smaller or a beleaguered alliance, compared to TCol. I was simply correcting you, as irrelevant as you may feel it is, the fact is WE is twice as big as TCol. |
Yes, small OR beleaguered. WE are the latter. I fail to see the problem with that statement.
bansisdead wrote:
I would say this following statement comes close to spin...
"They like to jump into conflicts somebody else has already won to make themselves feel like military badasses."
|
Simply an assessment of the situation based on available evidence. I'm always open to persuasion, but so far it seems to be holding up rather well.
|
|
Silverlake
Forum Warrior
Joined: 15 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 417
|
Posted: 07 Nov 2012 at 03:21 |
Janosch wrote:
Ossian wrote:
Silverlake wrote:
Sgt..Shanks wrote:
Thought Curse and DLords were doing fine trying to destroy us without any extra help... |
You reap what you sow, would you like me to start a laundry list of all the dirty deeds you've done while playing illy? Because I will, you might cry in GC... "Woe is me..." but you have done too many wrongs to white wash your history of underhanded behavior as a victim. |
Uhmmm...
|
LOL
What is in there? Soupe? |
Not even close you little trade vixen, 
|
|
Sisren
Forum Warrior
Joined: 03 Feb 2012
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 446
|
Posted: 07 Nov 2012 at 04:03 |
[QUOTE=Wexler The Fabled]Further to Sisren's posts I confirm that Wheel of Time is currently neutral in this global conflict. It has not declared war on anyone and has no plans to add its hat into the fray at the current time.[/QUOTE
Also, I can say at least that Dark has not requested ANY aid - neither military nor resource, from Wheel of Time, to show no impropriety in the neutral stance taken by our friends.
|
|
Nokigon
Postmaster General
Player Council - Historian
Joined: 07 Nov 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1452
|
Posted: 07 Nov 2012 at 06:32 |
Aurordan wrote:
Nokigon wrote:
I will say that much only, since if you are truly curious then mail Kale Weathers.
|
I'm not. As I said, I've figured out why.
|
And as I said, you are wrong.
|
|
Aurordan
Postmaster
Player Council - Ambassador
Joined: 21 Sep 2011
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 982
|
Posted: 07 Nov 2012 at 18:01 |
Nokigon wrote:
Aurordan wrote:
Nokigon wrote:
I will say that much only, since if you are truly curious then mail Kale Weathers.
|
I'm not. As I said, I've figured out why.
|
And as I said, you are wrong. |
And yet you can provide no information or insight as to how I might be.
|
|
Muristie
New Poster
Joined: 18 Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 42
|
Posted: 07 Nov 2012 at 18:23 |
Aurordan wrote:
Nokigon wrote:
Aurordan wrote:
Nokigon wrote:
I will say that much only, since if you are truly curious then mail Kale Weathers.
|
I'm not. As I said, I've figured out why.
|
And as I said, you are wrong. |
And yet you can provide no information or insight as to how I might be. |
Nokigon wrote:
I will say that much only, since if you are truly curious then mail Kale Weathers. |
Just pointing this out for you, Aurordan.
|
|
Kidrock
New Poster
Joined: 21 Nov 2011
Location: India
Status: Offline
Points: 7
|
Posted: 15 Nov 2012 at 21:25 |
No Basis for the declaration i just find it funny....if all cofeds declare wars on the basis of having cofeds whole illy will be at war !!
Plain Stupid
|
|
Tweet
![RSS Feed - The Colony [TCol] declares war on W](forum_images/rss.png "RSS Feed: The Colony [TCol] declares war on W")
The Colony [TCol] declares war on W
