TLR Plunder & Pillage Policy |
Post Reply | Page <123 |
Author | |||
Capricorne
Wordsmith Joined: 15 May 2011 Status: Offline Points: 117 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
[/QUOTE] Well... Seems like everyone agree.
|
|||
Angrim
Postmaster General Joined: 02 Nov 2011 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 1212 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
yes, i have heard the arguments about the relative value of surrender offers, first from H? and now from its opponents. they all run in the form of "if i hurt you badly enough for long enough, surrender will look like good value at any price". the trouble with this argument is that illyriad is a game, and there is a threshold beyond which players will simply quit because, as Sir Bradly noted in gc long before it applied to any of his allies, "losing is not fun". if you prolong losing for long enough, any player will quit. that can be part of the sandbox, but i should think leaders who do not condone the chasing of players from the game will want to consider the interaction in total. |
|||
jtk310
New Poster Joined: 05 Jun 2012 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 36 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||
Wow, this is a very old thread. EF's was the first post in 2 years in fact! I seriously doubt any discussion happening here has to do with the TLR Plunder & Pillage Policy. Why not make a new thread instead of resurrecting this dinosaur?
Edited by jtk310 - 17 Feb 2014 at 14:14 |
|||
Capricorne
Wordsmith Joined: 15 May 2011 Status: Offline Points: 117 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Hey Angrim (and others).
Are you really blaming the alliances at war for the fact that players quit illy? You can't be serious cause if one don't want to be destroyed, one just have to exit the war. Lot of players have done if so far on both side with, for most, the olny condition to not get involved in the war again and have no trouble with it. So if players play the wargame until destruction and quit, it's their choice to play so. What the alliances at war should do with it? Let players alone to let them the time to rebuild and come back strike the opponent in the back? What's your solution? |
|||
KillerPoodle
Postmaster General Joined: 23 Feb 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
More PR spin. |
|||
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM
"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill |
|||
Capricorne
Wordsmith Joined: 15 May 2011 Status: Offline Points: 117 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Er, yes... As everyone seems to enjoy it I wanted to join the fun and tried it too
|
|||
Angrim
Postmaster General Joined: 02 Nov 2011 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 1212 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
regarding specific solutions, it's never been a good idea to make policy in the forum. i am available via igm. |
|||
Capricorne
Wordsmith Joined: 15 May 2011 Status: Offline Points: 117 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Totally agree.
|
|||
Post Reply | Page <123 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |