| Author |
|
Kilotov of DokGthung 
Postmaster
Joined: 07 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 723
|
 Posted: 01 Nov 2011 at 18:07 |
|
not really, no...
maybe there should be a tread just for that... o wait..
|
 |
Kurfist
Postmaster
Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 824
|
Posted: 01 Nov 2011 at 18:01 |
|
it was a point kilotov.
wouldnt you think that flaming can start up easier on these kinds of threads when everyone not involved joins in too?
|
|
Patience is a virtue, resource giving is a sin
|
|
Kilotov of DokGthung
Postmaster
Joined: 07 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 723
|
Posted: 01 Nov 2011 at 17:30 |
 Kurfist wrote:
i know that, but my, your, Rill/ryelle, etc's comments shouldn/t even be here.
|
lol really? everyone could say the same about 45% of your own comments...
|
|
Kurfist
Postmaster
Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 824
|
Posted: 01 Nov 2011 at 17:26 |
|
i know that, but my, your, Rill/ryelle, etc's comments shouldn/t even be here.
|
|
Patience is a virtue, resource giving is a sin
|
|
SunStorm
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Apr 2011
Location: "Look Up"
Status: Offline
Points: 979
|
Posted: 01 Nov 2011 at 15:27 |
Kurfist wrote:
and lastly... how are the third party comments helpful? in my experience they help make the thread a flame thread, it should have stuck between H? and icon members... |
Points out that Kurfist is a third party posting a comment about third parties not posting third party comments....and the paradox bends space and time to the point that we are returned to where we started...
|
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR
|
|
Kurfist
Postmaster
Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 824
|
Posted: 01 Nov 2011 at 13:09 |
SunStorm wrote:
Createure wrote:
Why should HM or anyone else in charge have to bow to your personal whims? |
This pretty much hit the nail on the head.
Kilotov of DokGthung wrote:
HM plays the "i have a life" card.
all previous posts lose 80% of credibility and any petty and childish replays are negated for the next turn. all your cards got reshuffled. |
(^_^) +50
Jude, if you would be rational for a moment, you would see that demanding they meet your demands when you are in absolutely no position to make any such demands is folly...
Oh, and thank you for posting that brown-nosing remark. It really helps your defense. LoL |
and lastly... how are the third party comments helpful? in my experience they help make the thread a flame thread, it should have stuck between H? and icon members...
|
|
Patience is a virtue, resource giving is a sin
|
|
Kurfist
Postmaster
Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 824
|
Posted: 01 Nov 2011 at 13:01 |
Rill wrote:
Only a fool would attempt to negotiate an end to a war in the forums.
StJude is either a fool (which I actually doubt) or is not pursuing this discussion in good faith. |
what? How many people have negotiated war ends to a forum? its helpful, you have no idea what your talking about.
|
|
Patience is a virtue, resource giving is a sin
|
|
Celebcalen
Forum Warrior
Joined: 18 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 288
|
Posted: 01 Nov 2011 at 12:28 |
HonoredMule wrote:
Well it seems this thread has exploded while I've been off living my life (It's Halloween, you know). And apparently I'm under some form of "obligation" to negotiate here in the court of public opinion. I can't imagine what exactly would compel me to do so. |
Well StJude put his public terms into the forum (which I actually thought might have given AB and others some respite from their sieged towns - but it wasn't to be) but HM has declined in his own inimitable style. As ever, even in disappointment HM always leaves us with something though and here it is folks another cracking one liner for you to put on your signatures.
HonoredMule wrote:
I'm a little old to be incensed by clucking chicken noises. |
hey is it possible to market these things 
|
|
Silent/Steadfast
Postmaster
Joined: 03 Jun 2011
Location: Pacific County
Status: Offline
Points: 553
|
Posted: 01 Nov 2011 at 05:46 |
|
I guess I get to be the childish one...
From a strictly neutral viewpoint what I see is ICON attempting to build a base for use against H? who is endeavoring to prevent this. Both approaches are intelligent strategies, and both parties are using perfectly reasonable responses to the other's tactics. All this is fine. Then what I see is some propaganda on ICON's part, some angry responses from players not in H?, and some yawns from H? Leadership.
Now we must ask ourselves this: why must this thread's legnthly commentary exist? Both sides of the conflict can exist in a state of war WITHOUT neutral players going "blah blah blah".
Yes, I know, "spirit of debate" and all that, but what if we debated about something that actually affected us, like the suggestions forum? Let the involved people work it out.
|
|
"Semantics are no protection from a 50 Megaton Thermonuclear Stormcrow."-Yggdrassil (June 21, 2011 6:48 PM)
"SCROLL ya donut!" Urgorr The Old (September 1, 2011 4:08 PM)
|
|
SunStorm
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Apr 2011
Location: "Look Up"
Status: Offline
Points: 979
|
Posted: 01 Nov 2011 at 05:40 |
Createure wrote:
Why should HM or anyone else in charge have to bow to your personal whims? |
This pretty much hit the nail on the head.
Kilotov of DokGthung wrote:
HM plays the "i have a life" card.
all previous posts lose 80% of credibility and any petty and childish replays are negated for the next turn. all your cards got reshuffled. |
(^_^) +50
Jude, if you would be rational for a moment, you would see that demanding they meet your demands when you are in absolutely no position to make any such demands is folly...
Oh, and thank you for posting that brown-nosing remark. It really helps your defense. LoL
|
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR
|
|
Tweet
H? sieging small players nowhere near thier cities
Topic Options