Aneirin wrote:
GM Stormcrow wrote:
New gfx, Facebook (external logins), Sov exploit & more
- Sovereignty Claims
It has come to our attention that some players have discovered that levelling up Sov V on a square, then building a Sov Structure V, and then letting the underlying Sovereignty drop down to Sov I still gives the player the Sov V building bonus but for only a Sov I underlying upkeep. This has been deemed an exploit, and will be shortly fixed. To maintain a particular level of Sovereign Structure you need to maintain the same (or greater) level of underlying Sovereign claim. All Sovereign Building Structures of a higher level than the underlying Sov Claim on the square can support will be levelled down to their maximum supported level within the coming few days....
|
I am always amused by the limited ability of players like Llyron of Jaensch (H?)and Smoking GNU (DLord) to avoid personal abuse and invective when faced with a serious issue. Alas it is a sign of their immaturity which will give their leaders increasing cause for concern as the game develops and changes.
Lets to return to the issue of the "Exploit" quoted above. Instead of hurling abuse how about giving some answers? How many members of the Harmless? alliance have been "exploiting" the game in the way described above? How long have they been carrying out this practise? To what extent have they benefited from this? Why not not round up the punishment (The_Dragon's term) to each offender losing a city to pay for their "exploitation"? |
I will once again remind you that it was Createure from H? that reported the exploit to the developers.
Further, since you have so much time on your hands to troll the forums: Why don't you put that time to good use and explore this theory of yours yourself? You may actually give back to the community for a change.
Choose ten players at random from the top ten alliances (100 total), and review their sovereignty claims around their cities. Post the results back here.
I can assure you as I looked around there does seem to be an alliance or two that rarely has a claim greater than II... It isn't H? though.