Regarding the upcoming changes to neutrality

 

For the record, you have more members than we do. So stop trying to pass yourself off as the "underdog" or small alliance being oppressed by the evil H?...

 

Also, for the record, we did not attack you. You attacked us. We are merely defending ourselves from your aggression. To claim that you are doing so in the interest of saving Illyriad from domination by H? is an incredibly thin argument. In a game that has 8,500 players, how can the 75 members of H? possibly be in any position to "dominate"?

 

We, like everyone else, are trying to be as strong an alliance as we can and do as well as we can in this game. And we have never and will never tell everyone else what to do.

 

But we will defend what is ours and refute spurious justifications for those who attack us.

 

Oh, and we never defend ourselves? Why don't you ask Laura Christine about that... Strikes me that her 600+ troops got burnt to a "cinder" (that's how you spell it) last Th by a coalition of defending H?  members...

 

As to us not helping our members and sucking them dry for resources? I think if you ask any new H? member if help is given when asked for, you will find a universal response: "Yes". We are incredibly dedicated to the growth of ALL of our members, not just the largest ones...

 

K.

 

 

Best thing i've read since the angry mammoth incident. 

In my alliance we defend each other, unlike in H? where we've yet to encounter a single proper defence when attacking any of your members.

Perhaps those six members, those six top ten members who constantly leech resources from the alliance to power their cities while their members burn, should try focusing on their alliance rather than themselves for a second.

The objective of H? is to impose rules on this game, rules as to how you are permitted to play. If you violate these rules they will send a nice, polite siege train and remove you from the game as a "disruptive element to the peace".

I will not yield, you treat your own members like sh*t, you insult them by not letting them in by keeping them in the dark so much, that they actually mail ME to find out why they're being attacked, as their so called leaders tell them nothing, give them no instruction, offer them NO aid.

All while I sit and watch caravan upon caravan feed your already well filled bellies with more and more resources.

In White Company, we cooperate, every member is valuable, every member is informed as to what goes on and every member participates.

And when the largest players of the game in the largest alliance of the game try to subjugate the game to their own will, their own rules and god help us if we break them, then we strike.

We would rather risk our towns in the defence of the freedom of this server, than see it dominated by a "friendly" dictator, who really only wants everyones "best" interest..as long as that best interest conforms with their ideals and opinions.

I've dealt with your kind in every game I played, where they win, the game dies, where they lose, chaos and conflict is king! 

If Harmless is destroyed, the result will be countless small wars between countless small alliances, countless of skirmishes, of conflicts over many many many months until the server some day resets.

If Harmless destroys White, the result will be a charter, five pages long on how to behave against other alliances, if you wage war without going through the proper process handing in ten pages of justification to your H? overlord you will be squashed like a bug in two days of coordinated assaults.

All in the name of peace, we would all sit on our asses upgrading our resource buildings, sending caravans back and forth being bored out of our minds until this game grows as inactive as the game from where H? has come, Inselkampf, where they dominated, where the game has now died, because there is nothing to do but to suck up to H? in long winded treaties and spin caravans.

I spit on this world of yours, and tonight I will burn more of your towns to show you how I feel about your new world order.

Haha, yep, you got my character pretty much spot on there. Lack of respect for others? I call it the more enemies you make, the more potential food for my account.

Why respect neighbouring accounts if they don't respect it themselves? If they are leaving piles of resources and their army sitting at their picnic tables while they are offline, with no defensive measures and whilst knowing there is someone nearby who can obviously destroy them in reasonable travelling time, that's basically asking to be killed.

I find it amusing how you avoided my comment though, and picked out that single one.

But yes, that is my opinion, i am not peaceful at all. I play games for fun, and fun here is destroying armies, stealing resources and killing my way up the ranks. But sure, if you wanna play The Sims go ahead, more towns for me to hit right? 

Unless of course you're me, in which case you burn a douzen H towns a day for kicks and laugh as they try to break your own.